Education Portal for Students in India

How are points scored in FIFA World Cup?

Final tournament – The final tournament format since 1998 has had 32 national teams competing over the course of a month in the host nations. There are two stages: the group stage, followed by the knockout stage. In the group stage, teams compete within eight groups of four teams each.

Eight teams are seeded, including the hosts, with the other seeded teams selected using a formula based on the FIFA World Rankings or performances in recent World Cups, and drawn to separate groups. The other teams are assigned to different “pots”, usually based on geographical criteria, and teams in each pot are drawn at random to the eight groups.

Since 1998, constraints have been applied to the draw to ensure that no group contains more than two European teams or more than one team from any other confederation. Each group plays a round-robin tournament in which each team is scheduled for three matches against other teams in the same group.

• This means that a total of six matches are played within a group.
• The last round of matches of each group is scheduled at the same time to preserve fairness among all four teams.
• The top two teams from each group advance to the knockout stage.
• Points are used to rank the teams within a group.
• Since 1994, three points have been awarded for a win, one for a draw and none for a loss (before, winners received two points).

Considering all possible outcomes (win, draw, loss) for all six matches in a group, there are 729 (= 3 6 ) combinations possible. However, 207 of these combinations lead to ties between the second and third places. In such case, the ranking among these teams is determined by:

1. Greatest combined goal difference in all group matches
2. Greatest combined number of goals scored in all group matches
3. If more than one team remain level after applying the above criteria, their ranking will be determined as follows:
   1. Greatest number of points in head-to-head matches among those teams
   2. Greatest goal difference in head-to-head matches among those teams
   3. Greatest number of goals scored in head-to-head matches among those teams
   4. Fair play points, defined by the number of yellow and red cards received in the group stage:
      1. Yellow card: minus 1 point
      2. Indirect red card (as a result of a second yellow card): minus 3 points
      3. Direct red card: minus 4 points
      4. Yellow card and direct red card: minus 5 points
4. If any of the teams above remain level after applying the above criteria, their ranking will be determined by the drawing of lots

The knockout stage is a single-elimination tournament in which teams play each other in one-off matches, with extra time and penalty shootouts used to decide the winner if necessary. It begins with the round of 16 (or the second round) in which the winner of each group plays against the runner-up of another group.

This is followed by the quarter-finals, the semi-finals, the third-place match (contested by the losing semi-finalists), and the final. On 10 January 2017, FIFA approved a new format, the 48-team World Cup (to accommodate more teams), which was to consist of 16 groups of three teams each, with two teams qualifying from each group, to form a round of 32 knockout stage, to be implemented by 2026.

On 14 March 2023, FIFA approved a revised format of the 2026 tournament, which features 12 groups of four teams each, with the top 8 third-placed teams joining the group winners and runners-up in a new round of 32.

How many watchers are in the World Cup?

Soccer’s global governing body says ‘ around five billion people ‘ engaged with the World Cup. Without defining that metric, Fifa said that figure was based on fans ‘following tournament content across an array of platforms and devices across the media universe’

What is pts in FIFA World Cup?

Pts – Points (i.e., total number of points earned by a team after playing a certain number of games ).

How does the round of 16 work in World Cup?

In the World Cup, the top two teams from each group advance to what’s called the knockout stage. That pits the 16 remaining teams in a single-elimination tournament. The first game of the knockout round begins on Saturday, Aug.5, with a thrilling match between Switzerland and Spain at 1 a.m. ET.

How does goal difference work in World Cup?

The final round of World Cup group games is nearly upon us, which means it is time to reach for two things. The remote control, for things are about to get seriously compelling. And the calculator, because they’re going to get decidedly complicated. In theory, getting out of your World Cup group sounds simple.

Finish first, advance to the round of 16. Finish second, same story, although your path through the bracket might be a bit trickier. Win — or win enough — and you’re in. Except there’s actually a lot more to it than that. It is possible to be eliminated with as many as six points and to advance with as few as two.

And when you have four teams battling for two spots, plus the possibility of games being tied, it enhances the likelihood of teams getting locked together on an identical points tally, leading to all kinds of tiebreaker calculations and permutations.

• So, get ready to start hearing all about goal differential, the primary method by which deadlocked teams are separated in a group table.
• GD” hasn’t always been part of soccer’s history, but most certainly is now, and it has the potential to mean everything to the fate of hopeful nations seeking a spot in the knockout phase.

Goal differential — which soccer fans in other countries will emphatically tell you should actually be called “goal difference” — does what it says on the label. It is the outcome reached when subtracting the number of goals a team allows from how many it scores, either over a long league season, or, in this instance, the three games of a World Cup group.

How are World Cup groups decided if level on points?

READ MORE ON THE WOMEN’S WORLD CUP IN AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND – In the entirely likely event that two or more teams from the same group finish level on points after all three first-round games, the primary tiebreaker is goal difference. This is the simple calculation of the number of goals scored minus the number of goals conceded by one side across the entire group phase.

• The team with the higher figure comes out on top.
• If all sides involved have an equal goal difference, the team with the higher number of total goals scored nudges ahead.
• When total group stage figures can’t separate two or more nations, the focus turns towards the specific encounters between the countries.

The sides in question are first ranked by the number of points won from matches between the nations concerned. If there is still nothing to separate them, the team with the superior goal difference from the head-to-head games advances before goals scored in this sequence of matches is examined.

Should the nations in question remain entangled even after their head-to-head records are scrutinised, officials will have to dust off FIFA’s ‘Fair Play’ criteria. During their final group game of the 2018 men’s World Cup, Japan’s coaching staff realised that their position in Group H would be decided by Fair Play points.

Trailing 1-0 to already-eliminated Poland, manager Akira Nishino instructed his players not to search for an equaliser but avoid another yellow card at all costs. Senegal lost to Colombia by the same scoreline and bowed out by virtue of an inferior disciplinary record.

What’s the most watched World Cup?

Super Bowl LVII — a down-to-the-wire thriller with plenty of storylines, much-anticipated commercials, and Rihanna’s hit parade of a halftime extravaganza — was watched by 113 million people on Sunday evening. A fantastic number, one of the best in the history of American television.

1. But soccer fans may be inclined to triumphantly flip their scarves and point out that the Super Bowl’s viewership is a fraction of the FIFA men’s World Cup final’s audience.
2. Thanks to the games’ proximity on the calendar with the World Cup’s one-time move to November-December last year, there may be a natural inclination among some fútbol partisans to boast that the World Cup’s finale draws a vastly bigger global audience at nearly 1.5 billion, which is true.

But is it a fair comparison? The answer is probably not, for myriad reasons. The NFL has dominated American television for decades, and the Super Bowl culminates pro football’s season as a secular national holiday. The game’s audience remains large, in the era of cord-cutting and people using television less, because of a blend of football’s domestic popularity along with tradition, and casual fans tuning in for the commercial showcase and the half-hour halftime show.

There’s something for everyone, even if you don’t know Patrick Mahomes from Patrick Star. Soccer has been steadily gaining popularity among Americans for decades, both to play and to watch, but remains far behind other sports in terms of U.S. television numbers. And in the case of the World Cup finale, it’s a national-team match with a built-in global audience on hundreds of channels while the Super Bowl is played on one domestic network, and some overseas, by the best of 32 teams based entirely in the continental United States — perhaps the fundamental factors in why they have a vast overall audience differential.

The 113 million figure for the Kansas City Chiefs’ win over the Philadelphia Eagles in Super Bowl LVII is an aggregate number that includes primary broadcaster Fox’s linear television audience along with Spanish-language Fox Deportes, out-of-home viewership, and both Fox and NFL digital platforms, per number-crunching by Nielsen Media Research and Adobe Analytics via Fox Sports.

The peak was 118.9 million from 8 to 8:15 p.m. That audience average ranks as the third-most viewed U.S. television program since tracking began in the early 1950s, which is no surprise since the Super Bowl has been the most-watched single-network broadcast on American TV every year since 1983, when the “MASH” finale was the last non-Super Bowl program to sit atop a year’s viewership.

The NFL, which is making an overseas push, has said the Super Bowl’s “reach” — defined as people who watched a minute or more of the game — outside the United States in recent years is about 40 million while the average audience total is the 113 million figure for domestic viewership.

In the U.S., Argentina’s World Cup final victory over France via penalty kick shootout on Dec.18 averaged 16.78 million U.S. viewers on Fox and its platforms, and another 9 million on Telemundo and Peacock. In the context of the current state of the television industry, that combined 26 million viewers for the recent men’s World Cup final is an excellent number, and about on par with an NFL wild card or lesser divisional playoff game.

The largest U.S. TV audience for any single-network soccer match broadcast is 25.4 million on Fox for the 2015 Women’s World Cup final that saw the U.S. beat Japan. It also averaged 1.27 million U.S. viewers on Telemundo, meaning the match’s total U.S. audience average was 26.6 million.

Event	U.S. viewership	Global “reach”
Super Bowl LVII	113.1 million	40 million (outside U.S.)
2022 World Cup final	25.8 million	1.5 billion (including U.S.)

In the final’s participating home nations, the match had 24 million viewers on French television’s TF1 and 12.07 million across three channels airing the match live in Argentina on TV Publica, TyC Sports, and DirecTV, per FIFA data. The nearly 1.5 billion in reach is functionally a brag.

Having that many people consume some part of the match broadcast is absolutely a good thing, but the actual global audience that watched the game under traditional measurements for a bigger chunk of time is a much lower figure, but FIFA hasn’t formally given a specific average. FIFA’s media unit deferred questions about the audiences specifics to the general fact sheet already published and said more numbers will be coming out in a few weeks.

Still, a more precise World Cup audience average would still be more than the Super Bowl, but that’s a function of the final airing on hundreds of channels across the entire planet. While the NFL title game does have overseas broadcast rights, with it being aired in “about 200 countries” with more than a dozen non-U.S.

1. Broadcast crews on-site, it just doesn’t have the global popularity of soccer’s quadrennial championship.
2. Germany’s 1-0 win over Argentina in the Brazilian-hosted 2014 World Cup final has been the gold standard for the game’s TV viewership with an average of 570.1 million watching, based on Kantar Media and FIFA data reported by the Associated Press.

The measurements at the time didn’t include mobile-phone or online users. Using the reach metric, the 2014 match had 1.01 billion people watch at least a minute of the broadcast. About 700 million reportedly watched at least 20 minutes. It doesn’t help American World Cup viewership that the U.S.

Men’s national team isn’t a soccer powerhouse like the wildly successful women’s side. But its modest success in the 2022 event helped with U.S. audience numbers overall and is a positive for future audience growth. And it’s certainly a flight of fancy for American fans and U.S. TV execs to dream about the USMNT reaching the final at home in 2026 (the championship game stadium will be selected by FIFA sometime this year).

What makes soccer audience tracking tricky outside the United States are a few factors. One is trusting FIFA and its data — its reputation isn’t the best in sports, to be polite. Another is that some countries that air the World Cup don’t have audience measurement services such as Nielsen and Kantar Media, or use varying tabulation methods, so that data may be absent or suspect.

Soccer-mad Brazil, with a population of 217 million and its own domestic TV metrics company called IBOPE, averaged almost 37 million viewers for the World Cup final, per FIFA data. Of course, Nielsen data at its core also is highly educated guesswork — viewership extrapolations based on electronic sampling from 42,000 demographic panels from among the nation’s 121 million television households, plus more precise data on tracked digital and streaming consumption.

World Cup final vs. NFL wild-card games

Game	U.S. viewership
Giants-Vikings	33.21 million
Dolphins-Bills	30.87 million
Seahawks-49ers	27.46 million
World Cup final	25.78 million
Chargers-Jaguars	21.8 million

Even with imperfect viewership measurements, there’s no dispute that the NFL remains emperor of U.S. television, but soccer continues to make incremental gains as a whole. For 2022-23, the NFL’s 272 regular-season games averaged 16.7 million viewers across its major network and tech partners.

While that’s a decline from the 2021 season’s 17.1 million average, the NFL traded a smaller reach for its Thursday night games streamed on Amazon Prime Video in return for a much higher rights fee for those games. The NFL’s regular-season viewership record is 18.1 million set in 2015. For soccer aired in the U.S., Comcast/NBC-owned Spanish-language Univision’s most recent Liga MX season averaged 939,000 U.S.

viewers for Mexico’s top league, per Sports Video Group reporting, Britain’s Premier League enjoys the second-best overall U.S. soccer viewership on average, and NBC’s broadcast of Arsenal’s 3-2 win over Manchester United on Jan.22 averaged 1.92 million viewers (aggregate across NBC, Peacock, digital) to make it the most-watched Premier League match in U.S.

1. Television history.
2. It also got 382,000 U.S.
3. Viewers on Telemundo.
4. Premier League matches last season averaged 507,000 U.S.
5. Viewers across NBC, USA, CNBC, NBCSN and Peacock, which made for the second-best American viewership season for the league since 514,000 viewers.
6. Major League Soccer’s 34 matches that aired nationally on ABC and ESPN networks last season averaged 343,000 viewers, which was up 16 percent from 2021 and the best average on the Disney-owned channels since 357,000 in 2007.

( MLS goes behind the Apple TV paywall this season.) Observers have noted that the NFL is home to the best football players in the world, while the best soccer players are in foreign leagues, particularly Europe’s top professional sides — a fact that may suppress additional interest in soccer here until more of the very best are regularly playing and winning on American pitches.

Another factor that often works against the World Cup’s U.S. viewership is the location of the tournament every four years. In 2022, the final in Qatar was eight hours ahead of the U.S. Eastern Time Zone. The France-Argentina match began at 10 a.m. on a Sunday in the U.S., well ahead of NFL live game coverage but with extra time and the shootout ending moments before NFL games kicked off, the soccer match’s trophy ceremony and postgame analysis was booted to FS1.

Last year’s World Cup was shifted from its normal summertime schedule to the later fall because of Qatar’s brutal heat, a move that put the matches up against college and pro football in the United States — the two biggest viewership draws on American television, but apparently not especially major siphons as many worried. Lionel Messi and Argentina’s win in the World Cup final was the most-watched men’s soccer game on a single network in U.S. television history. (Julian Finney / Getty Images) In fact, this year’s World Cup broadcasts by Fox saw some audience records set.

• The 0-0 draw between the United States and England during group-stage play on Nov.25 averaged 15.38 million viewers on Fox, which set the mark for the biggest U.S.
• Audience for a men’s soccer match on a single network.
• That mark lasted until the final on Dec.18.
• With Fox’s digital numbers included, the USA-England total leaps to 17.2 million viewers for the Black Friday match.

Another 4.6 million watched on Telemundo’s linear and digital platforms. Those are great numbers for soccer on U.S. television, to be sure, but they came a day after the NFL enjoyed a new regular-season viewership record when the mid-afternoon Giants – Cowboys game broke 42 million viewers on Fox — a reminder that the NFL’s grip on domestic TV remains iron-clad today.

The NFL, which now has a bundle of media rights deals that will pay it north of $113 billion over the next 11 years, is keen to ensure that it has as much Super Bowl viewership as can be measured — particularly amid the changes across the TV industry. A year ago, the league hired Nielsen to conduct a custom post-Super Bowl audience survey of 6,600 households using the research organization known as NORC at the University of Chicago to determine the size of viewing groups across locations beyond what Nielsen may normally track.

Results show an estimated 208 million people watched Super Bowl LVI. Because the game is the top U.S. television draw and has long lent itself to family and group watch parties, and heavy viewership outside the home at places such as bars and restaurants, the NFL wanted better audience estimates for this unique TV property.

• Audience translates into dollars, after all, and the league has staked out a goal to be a $25 billion entity by 2027.
• The formal addition of out-of-home viewership tracking in 2020 meant Nielsen clients would get more detailed metrics on who is watching where and when.
• And while OOH remains imperfect — Nielsen audio signals at crowded sports bars showing different games and events isn’t simple to slice and dice — it remains the currency of the U.S.

television industry. Using OOH also means older Super Bowls had larger audiences than the known totals. “While it’s no secret that the Super Bowl is the biggest event across the media landscape on a yearly basis, the exact number of people watching the game has been challenging to pinpoint given the fact that people tend to gather in groups to watch the game,” said Paul Ballew, chief data and analytics officer of the NFL, in a statement about last season’s Super Bowl survey.

What this ultimately means is that the Super Bowl and World Cup are enormously lucrative events even as the television business continues to evolve, and while their respective viewership totals may be fun watercooler boasting topics, they’re ultimately two different entities — an apples-to-oranges comparison, or perhaps footballs to soccer balls.

The Super Bowl isn’t going to become the most-watched sporting event on Earth, and the FIFA World Cup — nor anything else — is likely going to oust the NFL title game from its domestic throne. (Top photo of the Kansas City Chiefs celebrating their win in Super Bowl LVII: Christian Petersen / Getty Images)

Where is soccer most popular now?

Where is soccer most popular? In a 2018 study, 43% of the world’s population identified themselves as soccer fans, while more than 250 million people play the game on a regular, organized basis. The so-called ” beautiful game ” is the world’s most popular sport and shows no signs of slowing down, as it begins to make its mark in markets which have traditionally been resistant to its attractions.

There are several reasons why it is so popular. At its essence, it is a straightforward game to play. While the organized game may have rules concerning offside, foul play, and handball, when played in the streets or the parks, people care little for these restrictions and often will play to their codes.

And unlike many sports which are choreographed and decided by coaches, soccer teams, no matter how well-coached or organized, often have to improvise on the field, and cope with the unexpected. It is also cheap to play. While teams that play in a league may require their players to invest in shirts, shorts, and football boots, there is very little equipment needed beyond this.

And for the amateur, they do not even need that – just a few people, some space and a ball is all they need to start a game. And yet the ball can be a cheaply available substitute – some old rags, a tin can, a coconut. Whatever is to hand will do. Jumpers can be thrown down for goals, touchlines are imaginary or decided upon by consensus, and games can last as long as the light holds – and sometimes beyond.

Soccer is also very inclusive, It is played by people of all classes, and social backgrounds, men as well as women, ranging from the highly paid stars of the Premier League through to the Sunday morning park footballers, or the neighborhood kids playing a pick-up game.

And it is not just the most dominant sport as far as spectators and players are concerned. In 2018, some 3.6 billion people – that was more than half the population of the world aged four and above – tuned in to watch the World Cup finals at some stage. That makes it a huge event as far as advertisers and marketers are concerned.

The Hotbeds of Soccer While a game that resembled soccer was first played by the ancient Chinese, the origins of the modern game developed in Medieval England, with games between rival villages that could last for days, involve hundreds of people, and often turn violent.

• It was banned for many years but, when restrictions were lifted in Victorian England, soccer clubs began to form, often as a social outlet for workers forced into the cities by the Industrial Revolution.
• The Football League was founded in 1888 – the oldest league in the world – and the game began to spread across England, and then north of the border to Scotland as well.

And, having invented the game in its current form, the British were responsible for spreading it throughout the world through expatriates who began to play it, and workers who were employed abroad. And international students who had studied in Britain also exported the game when they went back home again.

• The first countries outside Britain to form football associations were the Netherlands and Denmark in 1889.
• They were followed two years later by New Zealand, and then Argentina and Chile followed suit.
• Switzerland, Belgium, and Italy soon joined them, followed by the likes of Germany, Uruguay, and Hungary.

FIFA (The Fédération Internationale de Football Association) was founded in Paris with seven founder members – France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. Germany signaled its intention to join the same day. By 1908 soccer was an Olympic sport and the number of countries taking up the game increased, until the outbreak of the First World War put a temporary halt on proceedings.

1. However, on the resumption of peace, the spread of the game continued apace, and the first World Cup was held in Uruguay in 1930.
2. Today, soccer remains most popular in the countries where it first took root – Northern and Southern Europe, and Central and South America.
3. It also has an avid following in Africa.

There are three major markets where it has been slower to take off than anywhere else, though. North America Soccer fails to establish itself as a mainstream sport in North America for many years, although it was always popular within immigrant communities which imported the game from their native land.

However, America, in particular, had their sports – American football, basketball, baseball, and ice hockey – and there seemed little room in the sporting calendar for soccer. A brief flirtation with the sport in the 1970s saw the glitzy North American Soccer League launched with global stars like Pelé and George Best featuring, but it soon foundered amidst financial problems.

However, soccer took off at grassroots level becoming very popular amongst children, and their parents, because it was much more accessible and cheaper to play than traditional American sports. And the success of the American Women’s team helped push the popularity of the game, especially after they won the 1999 World Cup on home soil.

Now the MLS has established itself, crowds have grown, and soccer is set to overtake baseball in terms of popularity in the US. A further boost to the sport came when the women retained the World Cup in France again, returning home as national heroines. And even Canada has begun to catch up, launching its own Premier League this year.

India India and the sub-continent have been one of the markets most resistant to soccer, mainly because cricket is the dominant sport there. Despite this, football viewership in these countries has increased dramatically in recent years, primarily because younger people prefer the faster pace of the game compared to the somewhat longer and drawn-out format of cricket.

There is a domestic Indian Premier League, but, instead, what draws the viewers are the Premier League and other European League matches which are broadcast every weekend, and the Champions League which features the very best teams in the world. China The growth of soccer in China was restricted for many years by rigorous state control which banned everything Western from the country.

With limited economic and political liberalism, and the embrace of the market economy, this has begun to change, and now the pace of adoption is set to accelerate even further with the country’s leadership set the goal of winning the World Cup title in 2018.

1. Conclusion Soccer is the world’s most popular sport, both in terms of participation and spectators, whether measured by those who got to stadiums to watch their team in action or follow from afar on their televisions.
2. While it remains most prevalent in those countries in Europe and South and Central America where it first originated, even those parts of the world previously immune to the charms of the beautiful game are beginning to catch up with the global demand.

: Where is soccer most popular?

Do teams lose points in World Cup?

T he final round of the group stage of the World Cup brings with it a multitude of possibilities for each team to advance in the tournament. This year’s contest in particular—which has already seen thrilling last-minute goals, stunning comebacks, and shock defeats of favorites—is anything but predictable.

1. And with so many ways it can play out, every kick over the next four days will matter.
2. The group stage in its current form actually makes up most of the World Cup, comprising 48 of the 64 games.
3. Within each group of four teams, it’s a round-robin-style competition to finish in the top two spots based on points: three points are earned for a win, one for a draw, and zero for a loss.

The bottom two teams from each of the eight groups are eliminated from the tournament. And while finishing first or second ensures a team moves on to the Round of 16, the specific order in which they advance is important, too. The winner of Group A plays the runner-up of Group B, the runner-up of A plays the winner of B, and so on for Groups C and D, E and F, and G and H.

• There’s something special about this stage’s final round.
• As of Monday evening, each team in all eight groups has faced off against two other teams in their group and has one remaining game to accumulate any more points.
• The stakes are raised for these third matchups, as every team knows it’s their last chance to do what they need to do to stay in the tournament.

And unlike in the first two rounds, the final two matches for each group are played simultaneously, making it a nerve-wracking 90 minutes for all teams involved—and for the fans who are trying to monitor every potential outcome.

What does G mean in soccer?

‘ATHLETE’ STAT SHEET: ‘SHOTS’: -G = Goals By Athlete. -A = Assists By Athlete. -Pts = Points By Athlete.

Who is the best player in FIFA 23?

FIFA 23 ratings: The best players in FIFA 23

Rank	Player Name	Nationality
01	Karim Benzema	France
02	Robert Lewandowski	Poland
03	Kylian Mbappe	France
04	Kevin De Bruyne	Belgium

Is US eliminated from World Cup?

Updated on: August 6, 2023 / 9:00 PM / CBS/AP U.S. bounced from Women’s World Cup U.S. bounced from Women’s World Cup 01:56 The United States has been eliminated from the Women’s World Cup after a heartbreaking loss to Sweden in the Round of 16. The defending champions lost on penalty kicks 5-4, with the final dagger barely breaking the plane of the goal to send Sweden to the next round. The Americans’ bid to win an unprecedented third consecutive title ended when Lina Hurtig converted to send the U.S. home after a scoreless draw. It is the earliest exit in tournament history for the United States, the two-time reigning champions and four-time winners. “We didn’t put anything in the back of the net,” sobbed Julie Ertz after the loss. “The penalties were tough. It’s just emotional because it’s probably my last game ever. It’s just tough. It’s an emotional time. It obviously sucks. Penalties are the worst.” United States players react after losing to Sweden during the Round of 16 at the Women’s World Cup on Aug.6, 2023, in Melbourne, Australia. Carmen Mandato/USSF/Getty Images for USSF U.S. goalkeeper Alyssa Naeher fruitlessly argued she had saved Hurtig’s attempt, but it was ruled over the line.

1. The stadium played Abba’s “Dancing Queen” in the stadium as the Swedes celebrated.
2. The United States was eliminated in the Round of 16 for the first time in team history.
3. The American’s worst finish had been third place, three times.
4. Following the loss, first lady Dr.
5. Jill Biden wrote on social media that the women’s team “made this sport matter.” “Today, you inspired us with your grit and determination.

We are proud of you. Always remember that you encourage women and girls everywhere to show up and fight for their dreams,” she wrote. The loss was somewhat expected based on the Americans’ listless play through three group stage matches. But they played their best game of this World Cup against Sweden, only to have it decided by penalties.

• I am proud of the women on the field,” said U.S.
• Coach Vlatko Andonovski.
• I know we were criticized for the way we played, and for different moments in the group stage.
• I think we came out today and showed the grit, the resilience, the fight.
• The bravery showed we did everything we could to win the game.

And, unfortunately, soccer can be cruel sometimes.” “It’s a tough moment for everyone, but at the same time, I know they will use this moment as a motivation in the future, and not to go through the same thing ever again,” Andonovski said. It was the first match at this World Cup to go to extra time.

1. It was the fourth time the Americans went to extra time at the World Cup.
2. All three previous matches went to penalties, including the 2011 final won by Japan. The U.S.
3. Won on penalties in a 2011 quarterfinal match against Brazil, and in the 1999 final at the final at the Rose Bowl against China.
4. Sweden knocked the United States out of the 2016 Olympics in the quarterfinals on penalties.

Sweden goes on to the quarterfinals to play Japan, the 2011 World Cup winner, which defeated Norway 3-1 on Saturday night. Sweden has never won a major international tournament, either the World Cup or the Olympics. The closest the team has come is World Cup runner-up in 2003.

They finished in third in the 1999, 2011 and 2019 editions, and won silver medals in the last two Olympics. The result ended the international career of United States star Megan Rapinoe, who said this would be her last World Cup. She had taken on a smaller role for the Americans in her final tournament and was a substitute in the United States’ first and third games of group play, and didn’t get off the bench in the middle match.

“I feel so proud of everything this team has done,” Rapinoe said after the match. “Everything we’ve done on the field. Everything we’ve done off the field.” She came on in extra time against Sweden and in her final game and few minutes of action, she failed to control a ball played in deep, whiffed on a rebound, hit the side of the net with a corner and then missed the penalty that would have won the game for the United States. Megan Rapinoe reacts after missing her team’s fourth penalty in the penalty shootout with Sweden on Aug.6, 2023, in Melbourne. Alex Pantling – FIFA/FIFA via Getty Images The Americans struggled through group play with just four goals in three matches.

1. They were nearly eliminated last Tuesday by first-timers Portugal, but eked out a 0-0 draw to fall to second in their group for just the second time at a World Cup.
2. The Americans looked far better against Sweden, dominating possession and outshooting the Swedes 5-1 in the first half alone.
3. Lindsey Horan’s first-half header hit the crossbar and a second-half blast was saved by goalkeeper Zecira Musovic, who had six saves in regulation.

Sweden won all three of their group games, including a 5-0 rout of Italy in its final group match. Coach Peter Gerhardsson made nine lineup changes for the match, resting his starters in anticipation of the United States. It was tense from the opening whistle.

• Naeher punched the ball away from a crowded goal on an early Sweden corner kick.
• Three of the Swedes’ goals against Italy came on set pieces.
• Trinity Rodman’s shot from distance in the 18th minute was easily caught by Musovic, who stopped another chance by Rodman in the 27th.
• Horan’s header off Andi Sullivan’s corner in the 34th hit the crossbar and skipped over the goal.

Horan was on target in the 53rd minute but Musovic dove to push it wide. Horan crouched to the field in frustration while Musovic was swarmed by her teammates. The United States was without Rose Lavelle, who picked up her second yellow card of the tournament in the group stage finale against Portugal and has to sit out against Sweden.

In Lavelle’s absence, Andonovski started Emily Sonnett, who was making her first start for the team since 2022. The addition of Sonnett allowed Horan to move up higher in the midfield. Sweden pressed in the final 10 minutes of regulation. Sofia Jakobsson, who came in as a substitute in the 81st minute, nearly scored in the 85th but Naeher managed to catch it for her first save of the tournament.

Thanks for reading CBS NEWS. Create your free account or log in for more features. Please enter email address to continue Please enter valid email address to continue

What happens if two teams tie in the World Cup?

Here’s How Extra Time Works at the World Cup Every game in the knockout stages requires a winner.

Published Dec.5, 2022 Updated Aug.6, 2023

Tie games are inevitable at the World Cup, especially in the later stages when the stakes rise and the sinews stretch. But in the knockout stages, every game must produce a winner. That means if a game is tied after 90 minutes, it will go to extra time.

• Here’s how it works.
• After a short break, the teams will play two 15-minute extra periods, including any minutes of added time the officials deem necessary.
• There is no sudden death: Both periods are played to their conclusion, regardless of how many goals are scored (or not).
• If the teams are still tied after extra time, they go to a penalty kick shootout.

In that, a coin flip decides which side goes first. The teams then pick five penalty takers, and they alternate attempts until a winner is determined. That can take as few as three rounds of attempts — if, for example one team converts its first three and its opponent misses all three — or as many as well as many as it takes.

Is USA out of the World Cup?

FIFA World Cup 2023: US knocked out of competition after penalty shootout loss to Sweden – ABC7 Chicago.

Do goals scored count in World Cup?

Will goal difference or head-to-head be used to separate teams on the same amount of points? – Given there are only three games for each team in the group stage, there is a great likelihood that some of the teams in more than one of the groups will finish on equal points.

In Russia four years ago, there were three groups where that was the case while two groups had the same issue in Brazil in 2014. In the first instance, teams who have the same amount of points after the three matches will be separated, firstly, by goal difference. The team with the greater goal difference will finish above the teamer with the lesser goal difference.

Nice and easy. If the goal difference is the same for both teams, goals scored is the deciding factor. The team that has scored more goals in the three games will finish higher than the team who has scored fewer. Again, nice and easy.

What happens if two players have same goals in World Cup?

(Image credit: Catherine Ivill/Getty Images) As Argentina and France prepare to play each other in the World Cup 2022 final in a bid to lift the Jules Rimet Trophy, there will be another battle happening on the pitch: the race for the Golden Boot, Olivier Giroud and Julian Alvarez are still in contention to take home the Golden Boot, with both scoring four goals so far.

• However, Lionel Messi and Kylian Mbappe have both scored the same amount of goals in Qatar, the two stars grabbing five each.
• Despite being level on goals, though, it is Messi who sits atop the standings in the scoring charts.
• But why? Well, if two or more players finish the tournament with the same amount of goals, the player with more assists wins the award.

The FIFA Technical Study Group decides whether or not something is counted as an assist. Currently, Messi has three assists compared to Mbappe’s two, meaning he is just ahead in the charts. If, after the assists are counted, players are still tied, then the Golden boot is decided by minutes played in the tournament – the player with fewer minutes is ranked first, with their minutes-to-goal and -assist ratio better.

1. Since the Golden Boot (or shoe, as it used to be called) was first handed out at the 1982 World Cup, only twice has it been decided by assists, and on no occasion has the amount of minutes played been used, perhaps because this metric was only introduced in 2006.
2. Indeed, Oleg Salenko and Hristo Stoichkov shared the Golden Boot at the 1994 World Cup, with both grabbing six goals each and an assist, too.

With minutes played at the tournament not used to determine a winner, the pair shared the award. Meanwhile, at the 2010 World Cup, Thomas Muller, David Villa, Wesley Sneijder and Diego Forlan all tied with five goals. However, Muller won by virtue of having more assists – three – than the other players, who all had one each. Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1 *Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription Join now for unlimited access Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1 The best features, fun and footballing quizzes, straight to your inbox every week. Ryan is a staff writer for FourFourTwo, joining the team full-time in October 2022. He first joined Future in December 2020, working across FourFourTwo, Golf Monthly, Rugby World and Advnture’s websites, before eventually earning himself a position with FourFourTwo permanently.

What happens if 2 teams finish on the same points?

Goal difference, goal differential or points difference is a form of tiebreaker used to rank sport teams which finish on equal points in a league competition, Either “goal difference” or “points difference” is used, depending on whether matches are scored by goals (as in ice hockey and association football ) or by points (as in rugby union and basketball ). Early example of goal average being used to compare the performances of football clubs (March 1885) Goal difference is calculated as the number of goals scored in all league matches minus the number of goals conceded, and is sometimes known simply as plus–minus,

Goal difference was first introduced as a tiebreaker in association football, at the 1970 FIFA World Cup, and was adopted by the Football League in England five years later. It has since spread to many other competitions, where it is typically used as either the first or, after tying teams’ head-to-head records, second tiebreaker.

Goal difference is zero sum, in that a gain for one team (+1) is exactly balanced by the loss for their opponent (–1). Therefore, the sum of the goal differences in a league table is always zero (provided the teams have only played each other). Goal difference has often replaced the older goal average, or goal ratio,

• Goal average is the number of goals scored divided by the number of goals conceded, and is therefore a dimensionless quantity,
• It was replaced by goal difference, which was thought to encourage more attacking play, encouraging teams to score more goals (or points) as opposed to defending against conceding.

However goal average is still used as a tiebreaker in Australia, where it is referred to as ” percentage “. This is calculated as points scored divided by points conceded, and then multiplied by 100. If two or more teams’ total points scored and goal differences are both equal, then often goals scored is used as a further tiebreaker, with the team scoring the most goals winning.

What happens if no one scores in World Cup?

What Happens if No One Scores in Soccer What Happens if No One Scores in Soccer Soccer, also known as football in many parts of the world, is a sport loved and followed by millions of fans globally. One of the most exciting aspects of the game is the anticipation and thrill of scoring goals.

• However, there are times when no goals are scored during a match.
• This leaves fans and players wondering what happens next.
• In this article, we will explore what occurs if no one scores in soccer and address some frequently asked questions about this scenario.
• When a soccer match ends without any goals being scored, it is commonly referred to as a goalless draw or a 0-0 draw.

While goalless draws may lack the excitement of a high-scoring match, they still provide valuable points to the teams involved. In most soccer leagues, teams earn points based on the outcome of a match. A win typically awards three points, while a draw gives each team one point.

Therefore, a goalless draw allows both teams to earn a point, maintaining their positions in the league standings. During a goalless draw, the game continues until the referee blows the final whistle. The teams play for the entire duration of the match, which usually consists of two halves of 45 minutes each.

The players continue to compete for possession, create scoring opportunities, defend against their opponents, and strategize to break the deadlock. The absence of goals does not alter the fundamental rules of the game; it only means that the teams were unable to convert their chances into goals.

Frequently Asked Questions: Q: What happens if a match ends in a goalless draw in a knockout tournament?A: In knockout tournaments, such as the World Cup or UEFA Champions League, matches cannot end in a draw. Extra time, consisting of two additional halves of 15 minutes each, is played after the regular 90 minutes.

If no goals are scored during extra time, a penalty shootout takes place to determine the winner. Q: Do goalless draws have any impact on a team’s goal difference?A: Yes, goalless draws do affect a team’s goal difference. Goal difference is calculated by subtracting the number of goals conceded from the number of goals scored in a season.

• If a team consistently plays out goalless draws, their goal difference remains the same, which can impact their ranking in the league.
• Q: Are there any strategies teams employ to break a goalless draw?A: Yes, teams often make tactical changes to try and score during a goalless draw.
• Coaches may bring on attacking players, modify formations, or alter their style of play to create more scoring chances.

Additionally, teams may focus on set-pieces, such as corners or free kicks, to exploit defensive weaknesses and secure a goal. Q: Are goalless draws common in soccer?A: Goalless draws occur relatively frequently in soccer, especially in highly competitive matches or between evenly matched teams.

Factors such as strong defensive performances, poor finishing, or exceptional goalkeeping can contribute to goalless draws. Q: Can a goalless draw be entertaining?A: While some may argue that goalless draws lack excitement, they can still be highly engaging matches. The absence of goals often leads to tense and closely contested encounters, with teams battling for every inch of the pitch.

Defensive displays, individual skills, and tactical battles can make goalless draws captivating for true soccer enthusiasts. In conclusion, a goalless draw is a common outcome in soccer matches. Although it may lack the thrill of scoring goals, it still provides teams with valuable points in most leagues.

In knockout tournaments, extra time and penalty shootouts are used to determine a winner. Goalless draws can impact a team’s goal difference and may require tactical adjustments to break the deadlock. While they may not be as exciting to some fans, goalless draws can still offer a display of defensive prowess and strategic battles on the field.

: What Happens if No One Scores in Soccer

How many points do you need to qualify from World Cup group?

The traditional thinking is that four points are enough for a team to qualify for the knock-out stages of the FIFA World Cup, but stats show that since 1994 it hasn’t always been the case. – A look at World Cup groups since 1994 shows that a tally of 4 points in the table is no guarantee of qualification for the knockout phase.33 teams have managed to get four points since 1994, but only 17 teams, a little over half, have managed to qualify for the next round. Nigeria managed to qualify for the 2014 FIFA World Cup knock-out stages with four points.(AFP) When it comes to qualifying from a World Cup group, unless you’re one of the strongest teams aiming for first place, the traditional thinking has always been ‘Get four points’.

Win against one team, draw against another, don’t get beaten too badly by the giants of the group and hope that the other teams take points off each other. Look at this points table below for Group F from the last World Cup in Brazil in 2014. Argentina are the obvious favourites to win the group. But Nigeria managed to get into 2nd place with four points.

They drew with Iran 0-0, beat Bosnia and Herzegovina 1-0 and lost by just one goal to Argentina in a match that ended 2-3. An example of a World Cup group where a team qualified with 4 points This is the final table for Group F of 2014 World Cup. Nigeria qualified with 4 points from this group that also featured eventual runner-up Argentina

Team	Played	W	D	L	Goals For	Goals Again	Goal Difference	Pts
Argentina	3	3			6	3	3	9
Nigeria	3	1	1	1	3	3		4
Bosnia and Herzegovina	3	1		2	4	4		3
Iran	3		1	2	1	4	-1	1

Source: FIFA.COM But how often have teams with 4 points managed to get into 2nd place? To do this we looked at World Cup groups since 1994 when 3 points for a win was first introduced. (Before 1994, it was 2 points for a win.) The points of teams that finished 2nd and 3rd in a group were then tallied.

• From the chart below, we see that teams that have gotten 4 points have managed to finish 2nd in a World Cup group 17 times since 1994.
• While there have also been 16 occasions where a team that finished with 4 points didn’t qualify.
• Note that we aren’t talking about teams in different groups here.
• There have also been times where the team in 2nd and 3rd both ended with 4 points in the same group and have had to be separated by goal difference.) How many points have 2nd and 3rd placed teams got? This table looks at points that teams placed 2nd and 3rd in World Cup groups have gotten since 1994.

Teams getting 4 points have sneaked into 2nd place 17 times over the past seven tournaments. In addition, teams that have gotten 4 points have failed to qualify from the group on 16 occasions.

Points in group table	Teams finishing 2nd	Teams finishing 3rd
7	3 times	–
6	12 times	2 times
5	13 times	–
4	17 times	16 times
3	1 times	20 times
2	–	7 times
1	–	1 times

Source: FIFA.COM And if we look at how teams that have 4 points have historically performed since the World Cup in 1994, we see that in the last World Cup in 2014, four teams managed to come 2nd (chart below) while two teams ended up 3rd. How have teams that got 4 points fared over the years? This table looks at the fate of teams that have gotten 4 points in their World Cup groups.

Year	No. of teams that finished 2nd	No. of teams that finished 3rd
1994	2	2
1998	1	2
2002	4	4
2006	2	1
2010	4	5
2014	4	2

Source: FIFA.COM So why have four points not been enough? Simply put, it’s because of how much you have to rely on other results to go your way for this points total to be of any use. World Cup teams adopt the “win one, draw one” strategy as a way of being realistic about what they can achieve.

• Almost as a way of asserting some control over their situation, and giving themselves a clear plan of attack.
• But the fact is that there are any number of combinations of results that could put you out of the tournament, even if you do get four points.
• So if you’re a minnow in a World Cup group, it doesn’t mean that you should go all out for a win against teams like Brazil or Germany.

But if you think you can afford a narrow loss against a strong team and still go through with four points, you’re taking a huge chance by leaving your qualification up to other results. And by that point, it’s all out of your control.

How many go through from each group?

OFC – Qualifying was expected to begin in September 2020, but the FIFA international window in that month for the OFC was postponed by the pandemic. Earlier in July that year, the OFC submitted a proposal to FIFA for the qualifiers in response to the pandemic, intending to organise a group stage in March and June 2021 followed by semi-finals and a final in September and October of that year.

• After continued delays, by September 2021 the OFC felt it was “not possible at this time to organise a qualifying competition within the Oceania region” and it was instead staged in Qatar in March 2022.
• The qualifying stage was to be a single match on 13 March 2022 between the two lowest-ranked participating OFC nations in the FIFA World Rankings, with the winner advancing to the group stage.

Then eight remaining teams were drawn into two groups of four, playing single leg round-robin, The top two teams from each group advanced to a single leg knockout stage. The final winner advanced to the inter-confederation play-offs,

What happens if two teams have the same points and goal difference?

Goal difference, goal differential or points difference is a form of tiebreaker used to rank sport teams which finish on equal points in a league competition, Either “goal difference” or “points difference” is used, depending on whether matches are scored by goals (as in ice hockey and association football ) or by points (as in rugby union and basketball ). Early example of goal average being used to compare the performances of football clubs (March 1885) Goal difference is calculated as the number of goals scored in all league matches minus the number of goals conceded, and is sometimes known simply as plus–minus,

• Goal difference was first introduced as a tiebreaker in association football, at the 1970 FIFA World Cup, and was adopted by the Football League in England five years later.
• It has since spread to many other competitions, where it is typically used as either the first or, after tying teams’ head-to-head records, second tiebreaker.

Goal difference is zero sum, in that a gain for one team (+1) is exactly balanced by the loss for their opponent (–1). Therefore, the sum of the goal differences in a league table is always zero (provided the teams have only played each other). Goal difference has often replaced the older goal average, or goal ratio,

Goal average is the number of goals scored divided by the number of goals conceded, and is therefore a dimensionless quantity, It was replaced by goal difference, which was thought to encourage more attacking play, encouraging teams to score more goals (or points) as opposed to defending against conceding.

However goal average is still used as a tiebreaker in Australia, where it is referred to as ” percentage “. This is calculated as points scored divided by points conceded, and then multiplied by 100. If two or more teams’ total points scored and goal differences are both equal, then often goals scored is used as a further tiebreaker, with the team scoring the most goals winning.

What happens if there is a draw in the World Cup?

If a match ends in a draw after 90 minutes – two halves of 45 minutes plus stoppage time (added time to compensate for time lost to injuries and other interruptions) – the game goes into extra time. The match is extended by 30 minutes, divided into two 15-minute periods with a short break in between.

How does the World Cup work 2023?

What was the FIFA Women’s World Cup format? – The 32 teams were drawn into eight groups of four nations. The top two in each group advanced to the knockout rounds. The competition then moved onto a round of 16, quarterfinals, semifinals and final. The tournament was hosted by Australia and New Zealand from July 20 to Aug.20.