Education Portal for Students in India

HOW TO BE A SUPREME COURT ADVOCATE – Manav Rachna Vidyanatariksha Photo Courtesy: Google Images The Supreme Court of India, as the name suggests, is the highest judicial authority in the country. The Supreme Court of India was established on January 26, 1950.

1. It is also known as the Apex Court.
2. It’s the highest authority of appeal which safeguards the fundamental rights of its citizens.
3. All the decisions given by the apex court are binding on all the Courts, State Governments, and Union Territories of the country.
4. To be an advocate in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the basic qualification needed is LLB, i.e., Bachelor of Law ( Legum Baccalaureus ) from any university recognized by the Bar Council of India (BCI).

It can be 5 years of integrated law course or a 3-year-old bachelor of law. Once LLB is complete, there is another qualifying open book examination conducted by the All India Bar Association (AIBA), which grants the advocate the license to practice in any court all over the country after enrollment in the respective state bar council.

• Any student from any stream (Science, Humanities, or Commerce) can opt for this profession after appearing for the national level and the state level law entrance test.
• The legal profession is considered one of the noblest professions of all times, and hence after attaining the degree and getting enrolled in the bar council, the lawyers earn the white band to wear along with the black suit.

This white band signifies only truth. In Supreme Court and High Court, the advocate has to wear the black robe and the uniform; however, in Supreme Court, the advocate has to wear the robe throughout the year whenever they are stepping into the court premises.

Designated Senior Advocates:

The Designated Senior Advocates who earn the designation for their extraordinary excellence in the legal profession after the continuous practice of a minimum of 10 years. Late Shri P.P Rao, Late Shri Soli J. Sorabjee, Shri K.K Venugopal, Shri Fali S. Nariman, and Shri Mukul Rohatgi were a few doyens of the legal profession who were honored by the Supreme Court as Designated Senior Advocate.

• Their contribution to the legal profession is unrivaled.
• The Advocate-On-Record (AOR) are those advocates who, after fulfilling the eligibility qualification, appear for the exam conducted by the Supreme Court.
• They are the only authorized advocates who can file a vakalatnama in the Supreme Court.
• Hence he/she is held answerable to the court.

The Supreme Court conducts the paper for the AOR examination. There are 4 papers, namely Supreme Court Practice and Procedure along with the Constitution of India, Drafting as per the Supreme Court format, Leading cases of Supreme Court (which developed law), and Professional Ethics.

• Then comes the simple advocate, who might be a chamber junior or an independent advocate; they can argue in the court.
• Skills to become successful advocate:
• Apart from these, the most important qualities or skills for anyone to be successful as an advocate of the Supreme Court of India are

• good communication skills,
• confidence,
• good legal acumen,
• research skill,
• perseverance,
• listening skills and good writing skills,
• patience,
• Sense of duties towards the client, court, opponent, and society.

Time management is also an essential factor that sets apart a good advocate from the crowd. Polishing these skills and being diligent can be an outstanding advocate in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. As a budding advocate, one must listen carefully to the senior’s arguments and note down valid points.

Listening to the way the seniors argue, conducting themselves with the bar and the bench and also the clients, and being thorough with the legal points of the case laws are a few critical points that are ever learning for an advocate. Another important aspect that must be kept in mind while practicing in Supreme Court is the focus on the question of law rose in each case, as there are no arguments on the facts of the case but the question of law.

With consistent hard work, patience, and determination, anyone can become a very successful advocate. : HOW TO BE A SUPREME COURT ADVOCATE – Manav Rachna Vidyanatariksha

Who is the youngest advocate in India?

Who is Rachna Reddy Bollu? –

Rachna Reddy Bollu enrolled as an advocate in 2005 after obtaining her undergraduate degree in law from ILS College, Pune. She went on to obtain her master’s in law from the University of California, Los Angeles. She then practised law in the United States for more than four years. While working in the United States, she was actively involved in the Human Rights Project for the areas of immigration and naturalisation law, particularly asylum litigation. Concurrently, she also worked as a lecturer at the California International University, where she taught graduate and undergraduate courses in international business. After coming back to India, she worked as an assistant professor at the National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) for three years. In 2011, she began practising law again and worked in litigation. She deals mainly with land acquisition matters. Her practice focuses on the original side of the High Court, where she deals with issues of constitutional law. She’s also involved in civil and criminal litigation. Bollu is also the official spokesperson of the Bharatiya Janata Party in Telangana. “I look forward to working harder, and it’s more responsibility as a senior advocate, as a woman, and as someone who is younger than the rest, ” said Bollu while speaking to the Bar&Bench, Recently, the Telangana High Court appointed 36 lawyers as senior advocates, including three women. In an interview, Bollu said, ” I had a lot of scope and a lot of independence and freedom to choose what I wanted to do,” Bollu hails from Nagireddypet in the Kamareddy district. Her father is a sociology graduate who is a full-time agriculturalist. Her parents are from the Nizamabad district of Telangana State.

Suggested Reading: 17 Indian Women Lawyers Who Are Trailblazers Of Justice

How many advocates are there in Supreme Court of India?

Mobile No. M/s.

Can advocate practice anywhere in India?

(Querist) 27 May 2009 This query is : Resolved Sir I m law graduate from gujarat university. I m a member of bar council of gujarat and practice at mehsana district court. Now i want to settle in mumbai, Can I work there as an advocate?, please give me the idea,can practice as individual? Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Expert) 27 May 2009 yes,you can prectice in all over of indian courts. first surrender your local bar association member ship and take member ship to that bar asso. where now you want to prctice.and the secretory of that bar asso.wiill inform such state council about your registraton. A.A. JOSE (Expert) 27 May 2009 I think, perhaps,transfer of registration from one State Bar to another State Bar would also be possible by approaching the Bar Council of India. However, let us await further comments from experts on this aspect also. Uma parameswaran (Expert) 27 May 2009 To practice as independent lawyer you needs to change your Bar council membership.I think many lawyers are conducting cases in neighbouring state with out changing the membership. As to work as a full time lawyer you need to change your membership. SANJAY DIXIT (Expert) 27 May 2009 You may apply at Bar Council of India for transfer of your registration from Gujarat to Maharashtra Bar Council. After transfer process you may get the registration number of Maharashtra Bar Council and you may very well do practice as an individual advocate in Mumbai. Guest (Expert) 28 May 2009 The individual after surrendering his membership at Gujarat can apply directly at Maharashtra Bar Council who will do the necessary verification and enrol him on their rolls. Application to Bar Council of India is not necessary. B.B.R.Goud. (Expert) 01 June 2009 Yes. Certainly you can practice in any high court in India, with the intimation and transfer of membership in bar council of the state. A V Vishal (Expert) 02 June 2009 Dear Soni I have reproduced the BCI rules for easy reference along with the relevant formats of application. Chapter-III Transfer of name from one State Roll to another State Roll 1. Any person whose name is entered on any State Roll may make an application to the Council for transfer under Section 18 of the Act in Form ‘C’ in this Chapter.

The application shall be accompanied by (i) a certified copy of the entry in the State Roll relating to the applicant and (ii) a certificate from the State Council stating that his certificate of enrolment has not been recalled, that the applicant is entitled to practise on the date of his application, that there are no disciplinary proceedings pending against the applicant and that it has no objection to the transfer being ordered.

On receipt of an application for transfer, the Secretary shall enquire from the State Council concerned whether they have any objections to the transfer being granted, and he shall thereafter place the papers for disposal before the Council or a Committee constituted for the purpose.

If the Committee consider that the application shall be refused, the matter should be referred to the Council for orders.1A. On receipt of an application for transfer, the “transferor” Bar Council shall transmit the entire records relating to the enrolment of the advocate who is seeking a transfer, to the Bar Council of India together with original of the application for enrolment, retaining an authenticated copy of the documents with the “transferor” Bar Council 1.2.

(1) The order of the Council on the application for transfer shall ordinarily be in Form-D in the annexure to this Chapter. (2) The applicant for transfer shall be informed about the order on his application. (3) On receipt of a communication from the Bar Council of India of an order for transfer:- (a) it shall be the duty of the advocate who has applied for transfer to produce the certificate of enrolment issued to him under Section 22 of the Act for endorsement in Form D-1 in this Chapter to the State Council on the roll of which his name appears.

The said State Council shall as expeditiously as possible after the endorsement and the necessary entries in its roll transmit the certificate to the State Council to which the name of the Advocate is directed to be transferred; (b) on receipt of the certificate endorsed as aforesaid the Secretary of the latter State Council shall make a further endorsement thereon in Form D-2 in this Chapter; (c) on such endorsement being made and the other formalities, if any, required by law being complied with the transfer shall be deemed to take effect from the date of the direction of the Bar Council of India under Section 18 of the Act.

(d) After the application has been allowed by the Bar Council of India, the Bar Council of India shall transmit the original records received from the “transferor” Bar Council to the “transferee” Bar Council and in the event of the application for transfer is rejected for any reason, shall be transmitted to the “transferor” Bar Council 2.

(4) A Copy of the Order on the applications for transfer made by the Council shall be put up on the Notice Board of the State Councils concerned. From,

To The Secretary Bar Council of India New Delhi. Sir 1. I request the transfer of name from the roll of the Bar Council of, to the roll of the Bar Council of, under Section 18 of the Act for the reasons set out by me in this application.2.

What age is the youngest lawyer?

Finishing law school and earning that prestigious law degree is not exactly a walk in the park. It takes a lot of preparation – financially, emotionally, and of course, mentally. Students who aim to enroll in a law school need a lot of things to consider.

One does not simply settle; college degree holders give their best to qualify for the best colleges and universities, and some even decide to study abroad. Choosing a law school is important and should be considered even while still in college. If you have plans to pursue a career in Law, then you better plan for it ahead of time.

Remember that after graduating from college, you need to apply to a good law school. That is why doing the best college search is one of the many things to do when preparing for law school. Doing the best college search is one of the many things to be decided upon when preparing for law school. It is worth reiterating that the process of becoming a lawyer is not easy. After finishing your law degree and passing the Bar, you will soon find out that there will need to face new challenges. You will come to the realization that your experiences in law school did not fully prepare you for what you need to accomplish as a Lawyer.

1. You must start working hard to build your career from the bottom up.
2. Everyone starts somewhere.
3. Like any other profession, as a young lawyer, you may encounter ups and downs.
4. You are forced to face the problems of being a novice lawyer.
5. But do not worry; the advantages of being a lawyer outweigh its disadvantages.

Among these challenges is that clients tend to favor experienced lawyers. More often than not, clients would think twice before hiring a new lawyer to represent them. It is true, compared to a novice lawyer, an experienced attorney knows what to expect in a case.

1. They have years of experience under their sleeve, but this is not enough reason for you to doubt your competencies.
2. Prove your knowledge about the law by studying the case and identifying the best legal basis to device a strong legal argument.
3. This way, you can convince your client that you are as capable as your senior counterparts.

Young Lawyers Young lawyers, unlike experienced lawyers, have more time on their hands. With this, you can fully commit to your client, ensuring that you give their case the care and dedication it needs. Because you are young, you will have no problem communicating with your clients.

Just make sure to maintain a calm and accommodating character. You have to be open to the fact that your salary will not as handsome as what you would expect. But since you are eager to make a name for yourself, you will get the raise in no time! Most importantly, your lack of experience can be easily remedied by taking internships.

There are several law firms in the United States that openly welcome law students. The most coveted is the Summer Law Intern Program (SLIP) in the United States Department of Justice. Of course, you need to submit an application and go through the intensive and highly-competitive selection process.

To help you choose an appropriate school for you, take a look at these lawyers hailed as prodigies for their incredible feat of completing the law degree at a young age and from reputable institutions. Even if they all started young, their inexperience did not stop them from achieving remarkable accomplishments.

To help you, take a look at these lawyers hailed as prodigies for their incredible feat of completing the law degree at a young age and from reputable institutions. University of Miami Image Source Stephen Baccus aka the “boy genius” started studying law when he was only 14 years old. He finished his law degree within two and a half years which made him a graduate of Bachelor of Laws at the age of 16. The University of Miami graduate filed a case in the Florida Supreme Court to allow him to take the bar exam despite having an age lower than 18 years old ( minimum age requirement to take the bar examination ).

The court granted the his petition, Baccus has then become the youngest lawyer in modern American history after he took the bar exam, Having deliberated on the petition, the court ruled in Baccus v. Karger, 692 F. Supp.290 (S.D.N.Y.1988) : As to the requirement that one must be at least 18 years of age before beginning law school, we think the State has overreached the bounds of its discretion.

Testing eligible applicants satisfies the State’s interest in ensuring that prospective admittees are academically qualified; establishing minimum-age requirements for the pursuit of legal scholarship does not. Accordingly, we strike down that requirement as violative of the fourteenth amendment’s command of equal protection.

Can a foreigner be a lawyer in India?

What are the Rules for Foreign lawyers in India? – Background On March 13, 2018, Indian Court declared that foreign law firms or lawyers could not provide legal services in the country, whether it be litigious or advisory. Nevertheless, the ruling stated that foreign law firms or lawyers could come to India for a specified duration of time to give legal counsel to their clients.

• The court also requested the BCI to craft fitting regulations in this regard.
• In simple words, any foreign firm was not allowed to operate in India.
• It has been categorically stated that the rules shall allow foreign lawyers entry into India to function in a very restricted sphere.
• Impact on Indian Lawyers As per the BCI Rules for Registration and Regulation of Foreign Lawyers and Foreign Law Firms in India, 2022, foreign lawyers practicing in India would function in a very restricted sphere and the decision will not impact the Advocates practicing in India.

The BCI stated the following points –

Foreign Lawyers and Law Firms (FLF) are only allowed to advise their clients about Foreign and International laws. FLF can render advisory work for their foreign clients only. FLF are allowed to function in non-litigation areas only. FLF will not be allowed to appear in any Court, Tribunal, Board, before any Statutory or Regulatory Authority or any forum legally entitled to take evidence on oath and/or having trappings of a court.

Note: Entry of foreign lawyers is on a reciprocal basis only. In simple words only the lawyers of those countries will be permitted in India, where Indian lawyers are also permitted to practice. Area of Practice FLF will have the opportunity to engage in transactional and corporate work, including but not limited to joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, intellectual property matters, and contract drafting. The FLF can indulge in the following arena of services –

Providing transaction or business related advice and opinion concerning the laws of the country of the primary qualification; Providing legal expertise/advice and appearing as a lawyer for a person, firm, company, corporation, trust, society etc. who/which is having an address or principal office or head office in a foreign country in any international arbitration case which is conducted in India and in such arbitration case “foreign law may or may not be involved; Providing legal expertise/advice and appearing as a lawyer for a person, firm, company, corporation, trust, society etc. who/which is having an address or principal office or head office in the foreign country of the primary qualification in proceedings before bodies other than Courts, Tribunals, Boards, statutory authorities who are not legally entitled to take evidence on oath, in which knowledge of foreign law of the country of the primary qualification is essential; Providing legal expertise/advice concerning the laws of the Country of primary qualification and on diverse international legal issues, provided that such legal expertise/advice, unless otherwise provided for in these Rules, shall not include representation or the preparation of documents regarding procedures before an Indian Court of Law, Tribunal or any other Authority competent to record evidence on oath or preparation of any documents, petitions etc. to be submitted to any such forum regarding such procedures. Provided that an Advocate enrolled with any State Bar Council in India and is a partner or Associate in any Foreign Law Firm registered in India under these rules and regulations, can take up only the non-litigious matters and can advise on issues relating to countries other than the Indian Laws only. Such Lawyer shall have no advantage / right of his being an Advocate enrolled in India.

Registration Requirements FLF shall register themselves with the Bar Council of India to be entitled to practice law in India This prohibition will not apply to law practice by a foreign lawyer or foreign law firm in case such practice is done on a ‘fly in and fly out basis’, which does not in aggregate exceed 60 days in any period of 12 months.

Are lawyers highly paid in India?

Lawyer salary in India ranges between ₹ 1.0 Lakhs to ₹ 10.0 Lakhs with an average annual salary of ₹ 3.5 Lakhs. Salary estimates are based on 2.3k latest salaries received from Lawyers.

Do lawyers earn a lot of money in India?

How much does a Lawyer make? The average lawyer salary in India is ₹ 450,000 per year or ₹ 231 per hour. Entry-level positions start at ₹ 363,750 per year, while most experienced workers make up to ₹ 1,900,000 per year. The average salary package of a Lawyer is dependent on many factors such as, the court where they are practicing, experience, specialization and likewise.

1. Usually, the dependent factor of a lawyer’s income is the number of appearances that he makes in court as most of the advocates charge their fees on every appearance.
2. Fresh graduates charge around INR 300- 400 per appearance, however Lawyers with substantial years of experience charges up to INR 5-10 Lakh per appearance.

However, on the other hand, a corporate lawyer gets a fixed package of INR 6- 12 LPA. Top Lawyers such as Harish Salve charge around INR 25,00,000 per appearance. Related Article: How to become a lawyer in India after 12th? Law Entrance Exam: Syllabus, Eligibility, Last Date LLM Course: Full Form, Admission, Top Colleges, Jobs, Salary

Who is India most powerful advocate?

Ram Jethmalani – Ram Jethmalani was a well-known Indian lawyer. Ram Boolchand Jethmalani was his full name. At the age of 17, he graduated from Mumbai’s Government Law College with an LLB degree. Ram Jethmalani is the criminal defence best lawyer in India.

1. Ram Jethmalani was an expert in both criminal and civil law.
2. Ram Jethmalani worked as a law professor, jurist, businessman, attorney, politician, and philanthropist.
3. He was the highest-paid lawyers in India charging Rs.25 lakh every hearing.
4. Birth Date: 23 September 1923.
5. Payment : INR 25 Lakhs Awards: Human Rights Award by World Peace Through Law awarded in 1977, International Jurist Award Famous Cases: Ram Jethmalani, who was renowned for his sharp mind and ability to remain composed in any circumstance, has taken on a number of high-profile and contentious cases, including KM Nanavati vs.

State of Maharashtra, the murder of Jessica Lall, the defence of the assassins of Rajiv and Indira Gandhi, the case of underworld don Haji Mastan, the Afzal Guru case, the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, the Spectrum 2G case, etc. Books: Some of his contributions in the form of books include:

• Big Egos, Small Men,
• Conflict of Laws,
• Conscience of a Maverick
• Justice: Soviet Style
• Maverick: Unchanged, Unrepentant

Who is the biggest lawyers of India?

Fali Sam Nariman – ₹ 8 – ₹ 15 lakh –

Unquestionably, Fali Sam Nariman is one of India’s top attorneys and most well-known. In addition, he is a renowned Senior Advocate and judge of the Indian Supreme Court. Fali Sam Nariman is a master in issues of Indian constitutional law. He has established himself as an expert in that area.

Can a foreign citizen enroll as an advocate in India?

What was the SC’s decision? – Both the Madras and Bombay High Court judgments were challenged by the BCI and Lawyer’s Collective respectively before the Apex Court. In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld both the High Court judgments disallowing foreign law firms and lawyers, with some modifications such as holding the expression “fly in and fly out” to cover only “casual visit not amounting to practice.” This meant that the “fly in and fly out” route could not mean regular visits.

• On the issue of LPOs, the SC did not decide on their fate.
• They argued that they were essentially BPOs that managed secretarial support, transcription services, proofreading services, travel desk support services, etc.
• Which technically do not come within the purview of the Advocates Act or the BCI Rules.

: Foreign lawyers can practise in India but not appear in court: What exactly changes now

How much money is need to become a advocate in India?

Courses to Become a Lawyer

Course Name	Total Fee (Approx.)
Integrated LLB (5 Years)	₹ 30,000 to ₹ 3,00,000 per annum
LLB (3 Years)	₹ 22,000 to ₹ 2,50,000 per annum
LLM	₹ 50,000 to ₹ 5,00,000 per annum

How old is the oldest lawyer?

100-year-old Florida lawyer may be oldest practicing attorney in the state Jay Simons is 100 years old and still practicing law. JAY SIMONS At the dawn of the Roaring Twenties, Babe Ruth was a player with the New York Yankees, radio became a fixture in American homes, travel by airplanes became more than a curiosity, prohibition was in full swing and scandal-scarred Warren Harding was president. Jay Simons is 100 years old and still practicing law.COURTESY “I like what I do,” he said. “I love what I do.” At 100 years old and still working, Simons could be the oldest practicing attorney in Florida — if not the U.S. After serving in World War II, Simons enrolled at the University of Miami before graduating with a law degree.

1. He was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1950 and started a private practice in Fort Lauderdale specializing in personal injury and medical malpractice.
2. Working at a practice with attorney Sheldon Schlessinger, the firm of J.
3. Jay Simons & Sheldon J.
4. Schlesinger was among Broward County’s top personal injury and medical malpractice firms.

Simons also served as a municipal judge for Broward County, where he was known as Judge JJ. After years in the courtroom and on the bench, Simons has built a reputation as one of Broward’s best-known mediators. “I am good at it,” he said. “I can do almost the impossible with two people, and they agree.

Simons is working as a mediator through Zoom, an online tool that allows him to make full use of his legal prowess through 21st-century technology.His prolific law career continues on the web with him handling mostly insurance cases.The 100-year-old attorney obtains plenty of work from longtime connections in the Broward legal community by using Zoom to everyone’s advantage.”It does work, and it saves a lot of money and a lot of time,” Simons said.Married to his wife Nancy for 69 years, both are serious collectors of Western art.When asked what the secret to his longevity is, he has a simple answer.”My wife says I procrastinate, and I have used it to my advantage because I am 100,” he said.

: 100-year-old Florida lawyer may be oldest practicing attorney in the state

How old are most law students?

6. Are There Benefits To Applying To Law School Later? – Yes! Older applicants are typically more confident in their decision to join law school, have more experience and skills to excel, and are more dedicated to their education because they make it their top priority.

• Reviewed by:
• Former Head of Pre-Law Office, Northeastern University, & Admissions Officer, Brown University
• Reviewed: 01/16/23
1. ‍
2. If you’re interested in becoming a lawyer but are an older applicant, read on to find out how old is too old for law school.
3. ‍
4. While there is no perfect age to attend law school, older applicants often wonder if they’re too late to pursue their legal aspirations and if they can keep up with the younger competition.
5. If you’ve found yourself in a similar predicament and are debating whether or not you should apply to law school as an older applicant, this guide will tell you everything you need to know about attending law school at a later age.

The is 25 or younger. Only 20% of law students are 30 or older. While only a small percentage of law students are above the age of 40, there have been several successful older graduates. In fact, graduated from the University of Pacific McGeorge School of Law at 79 years old, proving age is truly just a number when it comes to law school! Thank you! Your submission has been received! Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

How old is the oldest law student?

Phone: 1.800.296.9656 Email: [email protected] John VanBuskirk was the oldest law school graduate in 2018, completing his degree at the University of North Texas Dallas College of Law at the age of 71. VanBuskirk, who served for 25 years in the Army, logged 800 hours of pro bono work while in law school, volunteering at clinics with the Dallas Volunteer Attorney Program and pro bono clinics.

• The Texan said retirement was never part of his plan.
• I guess it falls under the category of different strokes for different folks,” VanBuskirk told a local TV news station.
• He said some of his fellow officers in the military couldn’t wait to go fishing once they hit retirement.
• First of all, if I’m going to get up at four in the morning, it will not be for fishing.

It will be for something else. Second of all, it would drive me just nuts. It would just drive me absolutely batty to sit around and do nothing.” He graduated with a 3.21 GPA, making the Dean’s List four times, earned two statewide awards for his pro bono work.

Who is the youngest female Supreme Court judge?

We’re the only newsroom dedicated to writing about gender, politics and policy. Subscribe to our newsletter today, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, 48, was confirmed as President Trump’s third nominee to the high court and the youngest woman to ever sit on its bench.

1. Barrett was confirmed in a 52-48 Senate vote, with Sen.
2. Susan Collins casting the only “no” from the Republicans.
3. The confirmation came after a Senate session that lasted all night as the Democrats — joined by two Republicans — attempted to filibuster the nomination.
4. Barrett can begin working as early as Tuesday morning, but she is likely to hear her first arguments next Monday when the court returns to the virtual bench.

The mother of seven children, aged 8 to 19, is also the first woman on the court to have school-aged children. Trump appointed Barrett in May 2017 to be a judge on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago. She was confirmed by the Senate in October 2017 after Republicans accused their Democratic colleagues of being anti-Catholic when they extensively questioned the judge’s religious beliefs.

Before becoming a judge, she was a professor at Notre Dame Law School. After Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death in September, Trump promised to replace her position on the Supreme Court with a woman. When RBG was confirmed in 1993, she sailed through the process with a 96-3 vote. She later lamented how partisan the court’s confirmation process had become — a reality made even more apparent in Barrett’s hearings.

Republicans hold a slim 53-to-47 Senate majority. A devout Catholic, Barrett signed an advertisement in 2006 calling to overturn Roe v. Wade, which enshrined constitutional protections for abortion access. Though as a law professor, she said it was ” very unlikely ” the case would ever be fully overturned despite offering a flawed legal precedent,

• However, Barrett has maintained that her personal views won’t influence her rulings.
• In her opening statement ahead of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, she referenced her late mentor Justice Antonin Scalia, who she said shaped her judicial philosophy.
• His judicial philosophy was straightforward,” Barrett said.

“A judge must apply the law as written, not as the judge wishes it were. Sometimes that approach meant reaching results that he did not like. But as he put it in one of his best known opinions, that is what it means to say we have a government of laws, not of men.” In the coming months, the Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on the Affordable Care Act, a law that has outsized implications for women and the LGBTQ+ community.

• In past ACA cases, Barrett has written in favor of arguments to strike down the law,
• On November 4, the Supreme Court is set to hear Fulton v.
• City of Philadelphia, a case that could allow private agencies that receive taxpayer-funding to deny services to people based on their sexual orientation or religious beliefs.

Many view Barrett’s confirmation as potentially harmful to LGBTQ+ people. Some LGBTQ+ legal advocates believe that Barrett’s confirmation might set the stage to end marriage equality, She previously said Title IX didn’t justify letting transgender people use restrooms that match their genders, and Barrett has also given lectures to anti-LGBTQ+ group Alliance Defending Freedom, which the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated as a hate group.

The Supreme Court will also likely have numerous opportunities in the coming years to weigh in on how institutions handle sexual misconduct, as a wave of lawsuits that stemmed from efforts by the Obama administration to prevent sexual assault on colleges wind their way up to the high court. Advocates for sexual assault survivors worry that Barrett’s record — specifically two major sexual assault rulings from the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals — could foreshadow rulings that reduce protections for victims of assault by casting misconduct as a personal offense rather than an institutional issue.

Barrett’s confirmation follows several weeks of partisan tug-of-war as Republicans rushed to fill RBG’s seat and Democrats argued that the court vacancy should be filled by the winner of the November 3 election. The majority of Americans, including half of Republicans, agreed with the Democrats,

Who was the youngest female Supreme Court justice?

Amy Coney Barrett
Official portrait, 2021
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
Incumbent
Assumed office October 27, 2020
Nominated by	Donald Trump
Preceded by	Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In office November 2, 2017 – October 26, 2020
Nominated by	Donald Trump
Preceded by	John Daniel Tinder
Succeeded by	Thomas Kirsch
Personal details
Born	Amy Vivian Coney January 28, 1972 (age 51) New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.
Spouse	Jesse M. Barrett ​ ( m.1999) ​
Children	7
Education	Rhodes College ( BA ) University of Notre Dame ( JD )
12:02 Amy Coney Barrett’s opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee on her nomination to the Supreme Court Recorded October 12, 2020

Amy Vivian Coney Barrett (born January 28, 1972) is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, The fifth woman to serve on the court, she was nominated by President Donald Trump and has served since October 27, 2020.

Barrett was a U.S. circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit from 2017 to 2020. Barrett graduated from Rhodes College before attending Notre Dame Law School, earning a J.D. with distinction in 1997. She then clerked for Judge Laurence Silberman and Justice Antonin Scalia, In 2002, Barrett joined the faculty at Notre Dame Law School, becoming a professor in 2010.

While serving on the federal bench, she has continued to teach civil procedure, constitutional law, and statutory interpretation. On September 26, 2020, Trump nominated Barrett to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court of the United States,

1. Her nomination was controversial because the 2020 presidential election was only 38 days away and Senate Republicans had refused to hold hearings for Merrick Garland during an election year in 2016.
2. The next month, the U.S.
3. Senate voted 52–48 to confirm her nomination, with all Democrats and one Republican in opposition.

Described as a protégée of Justice Antonin Scalia, Barrett supports textualism in statutory interpretation and originalism in constitutional interpretation. She is generally considered to be among the Court’s conservative bloc,

What is the highest age of Supreme Court judge?

Constitution | SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LAW, COURTS AND THE CONSTITUTION India has one of the oldest legal systems in the world. Its law and jurisprudence stretches back into the centuries, forming a living tradition which has grown and evolved with the lives of its diverse people.

India’s commitment to law is created in the Constitution which constituted India into a Sovereign Democratic Republic, containing a federal system with a Parliamentary form of Government in the Union and the States, an independent judiciary, guaranteed Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy containing objectives which though not enforceable in law are fundamental to the governance of the nation.

SOURCES OF LAW The fountain source of law in India is the Constitution which, in turn, gives due recognition to statutes, case law and customary law consistent with its dispensations. Statutes are enacted by Parliament, State Legislatures and Union Territory Legislatures.

1. There is also a vast body of laws known as subordinate legislation in the form of rules, regulations as well as by-laws made by Central and State Governments and local authorities like Municipal Corporations, Municipalities, Gram Panchayats and other local bodies.
2. This subordinate legislation is made under the authority conferred or delegated either by Parliament or State or Union Territory Legislature concerned.

The decisions of the Supreme Court are binding on all Courts within the territory of India. As India is a land of diversities, local customs and conventions which are not against statute, morality, etc. are to a limited extent also recognised and taken into account by Courts while administering justice in certain spheres.

ENACTMENT OF LAWS The Indian Parliament is competent to make laws on matters enumerated in the Union List. State Legislatures are competent to make laws on matters enumerated in the State List. While both the Union and the States have power to legislate on matters enumerated in the Concurrent List, only Parliament has power to make laws on matters not included in the State List or the Concurrent List.

In the event of repugnancy, laws made by Parliament shall prevail over laws made by State Legislatures, to the extent of the repugnancy. The State law shall be void unless it has received the assent of the President, and in such case, shall prevail in that State.

APPLICABILITY OF LAWS Laws made by Parliament may extend throughout or in any part of the territory of India and those made by State Legislatures may generally apply only within the territory of the State concerned. Hence, variations are likely to exist from State to State in provisions of law relating to matters falling in the State and Concurrent Lists.

JUDICIARY One of the unique features of the Indian Constitution is that, notwithstanding the adoption of a federal system and existence of Central Acts and State Acts in their respective spheres, it has generally provided for a single integrated system of Courts to administer both Union and State laws.

At the apex of the entire judicial system, exists the Supreme Court of India below which are the High Courts in each State or group of States. Below the High Courts lies a hierarchy of Subordinate Courts. Panchayat Courts also function in some States under various names like Nyaya Panchayat, Panchayat Adalat, Gram Kachheri, etc.

to decide civil and criminal disputes of petty and local nature. Different State laws provide for different kinds of jurisdiction of courts. Each State is divided into judicial districts presided over by a District and Sessions Judge, which is the principal civil court of original jurisdiction and can try all offences including those punishable with death.

1. The Sessions Judge is the highest judicial authority in a district.
2. Below him, there are Courts of civil jurisdiction, known in different States as Munsifs, Sub-Judges, Civil Judges and the like.
3. Similarly, the criminal judiciary comprises the Chief Judicial Magistrates and Judicial Magistrates of First and Second Class.

CONSTITUTION OF SUPREME COURT On the 28th of January, 1950, two days after India became a Sovereign Democratic Republic, the Supreme Court came into being. The inauguration took place in the Chamber of Princes in the Parliament building which also housed India’s Parliament, consisting of the Council of States and the House of the People.

1. It was here, in this Chamber of Princes, that the Federal Court of India had sat for 12 years between 1937 and 1950.
2. This was to be the home of the Supreme Court for years that were to follow until the Supreme Court acquired its own present premises.
3. The inaugural proceedings were simple but impressive.

They began at 9.45 a.m. when the Judges of the Federal Court – Chief Justice Harilal J.Kania and Justices Saiyid Fazl Ali, M. Patanjali Sastri, Mehr Chand Mahajan, Bijan Kumar Mukherjea and S.R.Das – took their seats. In attendance were the Chief Justices of the High Courts of Allahabad, Bombay, Madras, Orissa, Assam, Nagpur, Punjab, Saurashtra, Patiala and the East Punjab States Union, Mysore, Hyderabad, Madhya Bharat and Travancore-Cochin.

1. Along with the Attorney General for India, M.C.
2. Setalvad were present the Advocate Generals of Bombay, Madras, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, East Punjab, Orissa, Mysore, Hyderabad and Madhya Bharat.
3. Present too, were the Prime Minister, other Ministers, Ambassadors and diplomatic representatives of foreign States, a large number of Senior and other Advocates of the Court and other distinguished visitors.

Taking care to ensure that the Rules of the Supreme Court were published and the names of all the Advocates and agents of the Federal Court were brought on the rolls of the Supreme Court, the inaugural proceedings were over and put under part of the record of the Supreme Court.

1. After its inauguration on January 28, 1950, the Supreme Court commenced its sittings in a part of the Parliament House.
2. The Court moved into the present building in 1958.
3. The building is shaped to project the image of scales of justice.
4. The Central Wing of the building is the Centre Beam of the Scales.

In 1979, two New Wings – the East Wing and the West Wing – were added to the complex. In all there are 19 Court Rooms in the various wings of the building. The Chief Justice’s Court is the largest of the Courts located in the Centre of the Central Wing.

The original Constitution of 1950 envisaged a Supreme Court with a Chief Justice and 7 puisne Judges – leaving it to Parliament to increase this number. In the early years, all the Judges of the Supreme Court sat together to hear the cases presented before them. As the work of the Court increased and arrears of cases began to cumulate, Parliament increased the number of Judges from 8 in 1950 to 11 in 1956, 14 in 1960, 18 in 1978, 26 in 1986, 31 in 2009 and 34 in 2019 (current strength).

As the number of the Judges has increased, they sit in smaller Benches of two and three – coming together in larger Benches of 5 and more only when required to do so or to settle a difference of opinion or controversy. The Supreme Court of India comprises the Chief Justice and not more than 33 other Judges appointed by the President of India.

Supreme Court Judges retire upon attaining the age of 65 years. In order to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court, a person must be a citizen of India and must have been, for atleast five years, a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession, or an Advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession for at least 10 years or he must be, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.

Provisions exist for the appointment of a Judge of a High Court as an Ad-hoc Judge of the Supreme Court and for retired Judges of the Supreme Court or High Courts to sit and act as Judges of that Court. The Constitution seeks to ensure the independence of Supreme Court Judges in various ways.

A Judge of the Supreme Court cannot be removed from office except by an order of the President passed after an address in each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of members present and voting, and presented to the President in the same Session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.

A person who has been a Judge of the Supreme Court is debarred from practising in any court of law or before any other authority in India. The proceedings of the Supreme Court are conducted in English only. Supreme Court Rules, 1966 and Supreme Court Rules 2013 are framed under Article 145 of the Constitution to regulate the practice and procedure of the Supreme Court.

• SUPREME COURT REGISTRY The Registry of the Supreme Court is headed by the Secretary General who is assisted in his work by eleven Registrars, and twenty five Additional Registrars etc.
• Article 146 of the Constitution deals with the appointments of officers and servants of the Supreme Court Registry.
• ATTORNEY GENERAL The Attorney General for India is appointed by the President of India under Article 76 of the Constitution and holds office during the pleasure of the President.

He must be a person qualified to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court. It is the duty of the Attorney General for India to give advice to the Government of India upon such legal matters and to perform such other duties of legal character as may be referred or assigned to him by the President.

SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES There are three categories of Advocates who are entitled to practise law before the Supreme Court of India:- (i) SENIOR ADVOCATES

These are Advocates who are designated as Senior Advocates by the Supreme Court of India or by any High Court. The Court can designate any Advocate, with his consent, as Senior Advocate if in its opinion by virtue of his ability, standing at the Bar or special knowledge or experience in law the said Advocate is deserving of such distinction.

1. A Senior Advocate is not entitled to appear without an Advocate-on-Record in the Supreme Court or without a junior in any other court or tribunal in India.
2. He is also not entitled to accept instructions to draw pleadings or affidavits, advise on evidence or do any drafting work of an analogous kind in any court or tribunal in India or undertake conveyancing work of any kind whatsoever but this prohibition shall not extend to settling any such matter as aforesaid in consultation with a junior.

(ii) ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD Only these Advocates are entitled to file any matter or document before the Supreme Court. They can also file an appearance or act for a party in the Supreme Court. (iii) OTHER ADVOCATES These are Advocates whose names are entered on the roll of any State Bar Council maintained under the Advocates Act, 1961 and they can appear and argue any matter on behalf of a party in the Supreme Court but they are not entitled to file any document or matter before the Court.

What is the minimum age for advocate in India?

Important FAQs related to Three-Year LLB Vs Five-Year LLB Course – Q: What is the difference between BA/BBA LLB and LLB? A: BA/BBA LLB is of five years duration and can be pursued right after passing Class 12. On the other hand, LLB course is of three years duration, which can pursued after passing graduation.

Q: Which one is better – BA LLB or LLB? A: Both BA LLB and LLB are equally good, wherein both the courses offer almost equal career opportunities. The only major difference is in their eligibility – Class 12 for BA LLB and graduation for LLB. Q: In how many years can I complete my LLB? A: If you pursue an integrated LLB course, you will take five years to obtain the LLB degree.

If you pursue an LLB course, you will take total six years (three years in graduation and another three years in LLB) to obtain the LLB degree. Q: Is three-year LLB a postgraduate Law degree? A: No, the three-year LLB is an undergraduate Law degree, the eligibility for which is graduation in any stream.

• The postgraduate degree in Law is called LLM.
• Q: Do NLUs offer three-year LLB? A: Most of the NLUs do not offer three-year LLB degree.
• The Law courses that are mostly offered by them include integrated LLB and LLM.
• Q: Can I complete LLB in two years? A: No, the duration of an LLB course in India is three years.

Q: Can I pursue LLB at the age of 40 or 50? A: Yes, candidates belonging to any age group can pursue LLB, provided they posses the required eligibility criteria of Class 12 or graduation. Q: What is the duration of BA LLB course? A: The BA LLB course is of five years duration.

• Q: Is CLAT compulsory for LLB? A: CLAT is compulsory for admission to integrated LLB courses.
• However, one does not need to appear for CLAT if they wish to pursue LLB after graduation.
• Q: How can I become a judge after completing LLB in India? A: You need to appear for the Judiciary exam after obtaining an LLB degree in order to become a judge.

Q: Is studying LLB difficult? A: LLB, whether three year or five year, is not a very difficult course to pursue as compared to other professional courses such as BTech and MBBS.

Who is the youngest law graduate in India?

Youngest to complete graduation and post-graduation in Law 0.325 mins read The record for being the youngest to complete graduation and post-graduation in Law was set by Pooja Sharma (born on May 5, 2000) of Alwar, Rajasthan. She completed B.A. LL.B (in the year 2020) from Banasthali Vidyapeeth and LL.M (in the year 2022) from Kurukshetra University, at the age of 22 years, 7 months and 9 days, as confirmed on December 14, 2022.

What is the last age to become lawyer in India?

Is there any age limit for becoming lawyer? Hi, THERE IS NO AGE LIMIT FOR BECOMING A LAWYER The bar council in India withdraw the age restrictions in India and all students are allowed for admissions. And in so many institutes there are so many kinds of aged people working.

And they are starting the career at 20 years and ends up to 60 to 65 years and they discussion among 20 years girl’s with 65 years old lady upon same topic so there is no age limit for to becoming a lawyer And for more information please check in this link https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-age-limit-to-pursue-law-studies-in-India Thank you!!:) Hello sir.

I guess there’s is good news for you as there is no age restriction on becoming a lawyer.Earlier there was an age limit but now the Bar Council Of India has withdrawn the age restriction to take admission in law courses. The students are allowed to take admissions in colleges in LLB or LLM courses without any age limit.Before this rule, the age limit for the general category for the LLB Course was 30 years and for SC/ST and OBC, the age limit was 35 years.Hope this was helpful.

Link CopiedThanks! Your report is submitted, the author will be informed about it

: Is there any age limit for becoming lawyer?


Grady A. Lowry