Education Portal for Students in India

Why is a human being called a social animal?A. Human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.B. Human beings live in isolation.C. Human beings are indifferent towards the community.D. None of the above Answer Verified Hint: > Social animals are the animals which interact highly with the other animals, usually of their own species.> Sociality refers to the extent of the organization of their social behaviour.> Social attraction is the reason why a human being called a social animal.

Complete answer: Thus, the correct answer is A Note

Option A) Human beings cannot and do not live in isolation – is a correct answer because it is true that human beings cannot and do not live in isolation. Human lives depend on other humans. Human beings live in groups whether they are smaller like a family or larger like a city or a country.Option B) Human beings live in isolation – is an incorrect answer because human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.

Thus, it is incorrect here.Option C) Human beings are indifferent towards the community – is an incorrect answer because it is untrue that human beings are indifferent towards the community. Human beings are called a social animal because human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.Option D) None of the above – is an incorrect answer because the correct answer is human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.The famous Greek Philosopher once said, “Man is by nature a social animal, an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human.” He said this because human beings live in groups whether they are smaller like a family or larger like a city or country.

: Why is a human being called a social animal?A. Human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.B. Human beings live in isolation.C. Human beings are indifferent towards the community.D. None of the above
View complete answer

What does it means that Man is a social animal?

‘Man is a social animal’ Hala Bader al-Humaidhi As Aristotle said, ‘Man is a social animal’. He can’t survive in isolation. Therefore, human beings interact with each other on a daily basis, having a deep impact on each other’s life. Though all men have the freedom of speech and the freedom of having an opinion, yet they still have some limitations, legal as well as social.

For example, Parents think they have the right to intervene in their children’s lives. They can inspect rooms, phones and other personal belongings of their children without even asking. But this is not right. Similarly, in a marriage, both partners expect from each other the right to know all secrets, to share every good and bad, and co-operate all the time.

This may sound good but it is extremely inhuman. Both have their own space which must be respected. Privacy is a basic right and a necessity of every person, in where respecting someone’s privacy is highly important. You cannot enter someone’s room without knocking.

You cannot use someone’s belonging without asking. You cannot force someone to tell their secrets if they don’t want to. You cannot judge someone or comment on them. You cannot push the relationship boundaries if someone doesn’t allow you to, not only it’s unethical, its also immoral. We, as a society often forget the boundary line of someone’s private life due to several reasons.

We may have been born in a different society having some deviating norms. We may sometimes, without even realising cross boundaries to protect or control someone. We may set our own expected boundary lines. Or sometimes, we assume that others are thinking the same way, we think, but many times, it happens unintentionally, specifically if we don’t listen to others carefully.

We as a society don’t notice such things because they have been embedded in the very root of society. Cutting the story short, respecting someone’s privacy can be easily defined by one’s own boundary line of respect. If you consider yourself capable enough to handle your issues by yourself, let others handle their issues.

Every person has his own self boundary of respect, make sure to understand it and take account of it. Many people like to spend some alone time, like reading a book by their own or enjoying a cup of coffee by themselves. Just respect their choices and privacy.

1. If someone is saying No to your invitation, accept that and don’t insist or argue.
2. If someone wants to move on, let them go and respect their decision.
3. There are some basic principles to respect others privacy: 1.
4. Listen to the other person with your full attention.
5. Give them the space to talk and try to understand what they say.2.

Try to focus on the verbal cues anyone gives you during a talk. Such as ‘Knock the door before entering’.3. Consider and remember that everyone has his own goals, plans, feelings, in sum – his whole life. So respect their space and accept it.4. One of the most important principles, pay attention to the body language of the other person.

Gestures speak louder than words. For example, if someone’s stepping back a little, it means you are standing too close.5. Never ever touch someone’s mobile phone, laptop, documents or other such belongings without permission. ‘Respect is how to treat everyone’, as Richard Branson said. Think about your life now and think about the people around you, show them the respect they deserve, especially in their private lives.

The author is a consultant in Public Relations and Personality Types. Instagram: @Tipsbyhalahill Related Story : ‘Man is a social animal’
View complete answer

Is human being a social animal?

Human beings are a social species that relies on cooperation to survive and thrive. Understanding how and why cooperation succeeds or fails is integral to solving the many global challenges we face. Cooperation lies at the heart of human lives and society — from day-to-day interactions to some of our greatest endeavours.

1. Understanding cooperation — what motivates it, how it develops, how it happens and when it fails to happen — is therefore an important part of understanding all kinds of human behaviour.
2. In this focus issue of Nature Human Behaviour, we bring together review, opinion and research content on human cooperation from across the journal’s scope — including evolution, anthropology, ecology, economics, neuroscience and environmental science — to spark interdisciplinary conversation and perhaps even inspire some scientific cooperation.

In our dedicated collection on cooperation ( https://www.nature.com/collections/gvmywthghh ), we combine new commissioned content with work from our archive that exemplifies the breadth of enquiry in this important interdisciplinary field. Klaus Vedfelt/DigitalVision/Getty Why do we cooperate at all, when choosing the selfish option may seem like the most logical and rewarding in a competitive world? A Review by Hilbe et al. discusses the recent formal theoretical work on partnership versus rivalry in social dilemmas and argues that rivalry tends to develop in smaller populations with limited numbers of interactions, while more frequent interactions encourage cooperation to emerge as an evolutionarily stable strategy.

Modelling work by Jagau and van Veelen 1 we published last year also found evidence for multiple stable states of cooperation, showing, in contrast to previous work, how flexible, deliberative strategies can evolve. Of course, many other species have made a success out of cooperation, and a Comment by Brosnan makes the case for a comparative economics approach to uncover cooperation’s evolutionary path.

We can also interrogate the mechanisms and motives behind cooperation by observing how it happens in practice. In a Review, Fehr and Schurtenberger evaluate the experimental literature for evidence of a fixed social norm of conditional cooperation supported by peer punishment, which, they argue, can account for multiple recurring patterns of human behaviour seen in cooperative contexts.

In future, we may gain an even more precise understanding of individual motives in these types of cooperative experiments, by directly observing neural responses during game play, as argued in a Comment by Declerck and colleagues, Successful cooperation requires not only cooperative choices, but also a way to signal your intent and good qualities to potential partners.

A Perspective by Bliege-Bird and colleagues examines the subtle signalling that people deploy to solidify their long-term cooperative relationships, using the practice of sharing catches after lizard hunts among Martu hunter-gatherer women as a case study.

• The most successful hunters share out, subtly, the meat with all, strengthening their reciprocal bonds and distributing the burden of resource scarcity risks.
• This chimes with a Comment by Aktipis et al.
• Who suggest that the evolutionary concept of ‘fitness interdependence’ between individuals for survival and reproduction could be adopted as a framework across disciplines to understand why cooperation is so integral to our lifeways.

Even in difficult situations, the desire for cooperation would appear to often be nascent and the evidence suggests that we are naturals at it, given the opportunity. The Martu example is a system of trust and shared risk that speaks to some of the most pressing issues that humans face today globally, that is, the sharing of risk and the ‘trust’ needed to take collective action.

In a previous issue, Koomen and Herrmann 2 showed that children as young as six years old can spontaneously find ways to collaborate to maintain a shared, limited resource. And indeed, a 2017 review of the literature by McAuliffe et al.3 provided ample evidence that children acquire notions of fairness from a surprisingly early age.

However, we know all too well from observing the real world that coordination among adults often fails. Gächter et al.4 provided partial insight into why this might be, showing that adult participants contribute more when establishing a new collective good, but contribute much less to maintain an existing resource.

1. Muthukrishna et al.5 showed that typical anti-corruption strategies may have negative impacts on cooperation, depending on the cultural context.
2. These findings are a caution that the levers we apply to encourage cooperation should be tailored to context.
3. How can we nurture cooperation for the common good? In experiments run by Grossmann et al.6, the authors found that they could induce participants to engage in ‘wise reasoning’ to avert making automatic, selfish decisions.

In a Comment, Dannenberg and Barrett note that cooperation often fails when individuals are uncertain about the relative importance of their own effect on a critical, environmental threshold, and argue, through successful examples, such as the Montreal Protocol, that institutions must make cooperation the more attractive option.

In a similar vein, Castilla-Rho et al.7 presented a model that identifies the ‘tipping points’ at which groundwater conservation becomes a widely accepted social norm across diverse cultural settings, which can be used by conservation managers to predict the most effective interventions. Finally, some of the seemingly most intractable cooperation problems in the world today are the conflicts between rival nations and different political, religious or ethnic groups.

However, Fotouhi et al. show that a strong barrier to cooperation is simple lack of communication and suggest that promoting even sparse interconnections between previously segregated societies can support the evolution of cooperation globally. Even in difficult situations, the desire for cooperation would appear to often be nascent and the evidence suggests that we are naturals at it, given the opportunity.
View complete answer

How does Man becomes a social animal based on the essay?

Brief Essay on Man as a Social Animal (1097 Words) Here is your essay on Man as a Social Animal! Long ago, Aristotle expressed that ‘Man is essentially a social animal by nature’. He cannot live without society, if he does so; he is either beast or God.

1. Man realises his goals, his existence in the society: he finds various ingredients in society through which he can attain the perfectness of the life.
2. The day, he is born to the day he leaves this planet he is in the society.
3. Image Courtesy : totallycoolpix.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/20130902_burning_man_2013/burning_man_2013_013.jpg Man like ‘Robinson Crusoe’ can never develop his personality, language, culture and ‘inner deep’ by living outside the society.

The statement that a man is a social animal implies that man cannot live without society. Society is indispensable for him. He needs society as matter of nature, necessity and for his well being. All these three implications are explained as follows: 1.

1. Man is a social animal by nature.
2. Man’s nature is such that he cannot afford to live alone.
3. No human being is known to have normally developed in isolation.
4. Maclver has cited three cases in which infants were isolated from all social relationships to make experiments about man’s social nature.
5. The first case is of Kaspar Hauser who from his childhood until his seventeenth year was brought up in the woods of Nuremberg.

In his case it was found that at the age of seventeen he could hardly walk, had the mind of an infant and could mutter only a few meaningless phrases. In spite of his subsequent education he could never make himself a normal man. The second case was of two Hindu children who in 1929 were discovered in a wolf den.

One of the children died soon after discovery. The other child could walk only on all four, possessed no language except wolf like growls. She was shy of human being and afraid of them. It was only after careful and sympathetic training that she could learn some social habits. The third case was of Anna, an illegitimate American child who had been placed in a room at the age of six months and discovered five years later.

On discovery it was found that she could not walk or speak and was indifferent to people around her. These cases prove that human being is social by nature. Human nature develops in man only when he lives in society, only when he shares with his fellow beings a common life.

The accounts of the noble savage free from all social restraints living in woods and appeasing his appetite with the fruits are idyllic tales devoid of all historical value. Even the sadhus who have retired from worldly life live in the company of their fellows in the forest. All this tends to show that society is something which fulfills a vital need in man’s constitution, it is not something accidentally added to or super imposed on human nature.

His very existence is wielded into the fabrics of society. He knows himself and his fellow beings within the framework of society. Indeed, man is social by nature.2. Man lives in society because necessity compels him so. Many of his needs will remain unsatisfied if he does not have the cooperation of his fellow beings.

1. Every individual is the off- spring of a social relationship established between man and woman.
2. The child is brought up under the care of his parents and learns the lessons of citizenship in their company.
3. If the newborn’ baby does not receive protection and attention by the society, he would not survive even a day.

We get our needs of food, shelter arid clothing fulfilled only by living and cooperating with others. The stories of cases cited above prove that people reared among animals away from human beings remained animals in habits. The importance of society for physical and mental development is thus obvious.

• No one can become a human being unless he lives with human beings.
• Fear of wild animal makes some seek cooperation of other; the satisfaction of food hunger, rest-hunger etc.
• Through exchange or barter may bring some into relation; joint action and division of labour may be found necessary for the achievement of some common end which the individual alone may not be able to secure.

The need for self-preservation, which is felt by every being makes a man social. Therefore, it is not due to his nature alone but also due to his necessities that man lives in society.3. Man lives in society for his mental and intellectual development.

Society preserves our culture and transmits it to succeeding generations. It both liberates and limits our- potentialities as individuals and moulds our attitudes, our beliefs, our morals and ideals. The mind of a man without society, as feral cases show, remains the mind of an infant even at the age of adulthood.

The cultural heritage directs our personality. Thus society fulfills not only our physical needs but also determines our mental equipment. It therefore stands established beyond any doubt that man is a social animal. Man requires society as a sine qua non condition for his life as a human being.

It is not one or a few particular needs or tendencies of man that compel him to live in society but without it his personality cannot come into being. On the basis of the above discussion it may be concluded that individuals and society are interdependent. The relationship between them is not one-sided; both are essential for the comprehension of other.

Neither the individuals belong to society as cells belong to the organism, not the society a mere contrivance to satisfy certain human needs. Neither the society itself has a value beyond the service which it renders to its members, not the individuals can thrive without society.

1. Neither the society is inimical to the development of individuality, nor it exists in its own right.
2. In fact, both are complementary and supplementary to each other.
3. Cooley writes: “A separate individual is an obstruction unknown to experience and individuals.
4. Society and individuals do not denote separate phenomena but are simply collective and distributive aspects of the same thing.” Explaining the relationship between individual and society Marcher observes: “Society with all the traditions, the institutions, the equipment it provides a great changeful order of social life, arising from the psychological as well as the physical needs of the individual, an order wherein human beings are born and fulfill themselves with whatever limitations and wherein they transmit to coming generations the requirement of living.

We must reject any view of this pattern that sees the relationship between individual and society from merely one or the other side”. : Brief Essay on Man as a Social Animal (1097 Words)
View complete answer

Why Man is the only animal which can be educated?

None of the animal will ever attempt to experiment with nature to learn more except man. Animals observe the nature and have their complete learning but man experiment and intervene in the very functioning and organization of nature.
View complete answer

Why man is a unique animal?

1. Home
2. Countdowns

A crowd of people cheering. But what makes humans so special and unique compared with the animal kingdom? (Image credit: Image Source via Getty Images) Humans are unusual animals by any stretch of the imagination. Our special anatomy and abilities, such as big brains and opposable thumbs, have enabled us to change our world dramatically and even launch off the planet.
View complete answer

Why humans are called intelligent animals?

Man is the most intelligent animal. What could be the fact the helped us to reach such a conclusion ? Text Solution Solution : 1) Man is the most intelligent animal in animal kingdom.2) This is possible by well development of brain and its marvellous function.3) Human brain has abilities to learn from concepts.4) It understands, applies logic and reason.5) The brain also recognizes patterns, comprehends ideas.6) The human brain has ability for making plans, solving problems, making decisions and retaining information.7) Man is the only animal who uses language to communicate.8) Intelligence enables humans to experience and think.9) It has also consciousness and self-awareness.
View complete answer

Why is man called an economic animal?

The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining ‘factor’ or ‘sphere’ of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis.
View complete answer

Why is man naturally a social animal?

The famous Greek Philosopher once said ‘Man is by nature a social animal, an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human.’ He said this because human being live in groups whether they are smaller like a family or larger like a city or country.
View complete answer

What makes a man different from all other animals?

How are humans different from other animals? There are many similarities between humans and other animals that you may have noticed. Humans and animals both eat, sleep, think, and communicate. We are also similar in a lot of the, But we also have a lot of differences.

Are there any differences that set humans apart, uniquely, from all other animals? Some people think that the main differences between humans other animal species is our ability of complex reasoning, our use of complex language, our ability to solve difficult problems, and introspection (this means describing your own thoughts and feelings).

Others also feel that the ability for creativity or the feeling of joy or sorrow is uniquely human. Humans have a highly developed brain that allows us to do many of these things. But are these things uniquely human? First, let’s get into the fuzzy part of that question. A baboon is being given a mirror test. Image by Moshe Blank via Wikimedia Commons. There are a lot of things that humans think are true about animals and animal behavior, but some of these ideas are problematic. Sometimes, when we do tests on animal behavior, we use tests that apply to animals like humans, and we expect animals to perform in a similar way if they have similar abilities.

• For example, the mirror test is used to see if animals have awareness of themselves as the image that they see in a mirror.
• If a mark is placed on the animal, they should show signs of knowing that the mark is on their body.
• Maybe they try to rub it off with their hands or, if they can’t use their limbs that way, they may move their body a bit to see the mark better.

But what if an animal doesn’t have the best vision? Do we just say that, because they can’t perform the test in that way, they wouldn’t pass? Expecting all other animals to perform similarly to humans on tests can be problematic. This makes learning about some parts of animal behavior difficult.

1. But, what we have learned is pretty exciting.
2. As we keep learning more and more about animal behavior, we are continually surprised.
3. Gunnison’s prairie dogs seem to have a fairly complex language.
4. Rather than just sounding a basic alarm call, researchers have found that their alarm calls can describe specific predator speed, color, shape, and size.

So when is this communication complex enough for us to call it a language? Elephants have been found to communicate across miles of land through subsonic sound. And when researchers slow a hummingbird’s chirp down, it seems the song may be as complex as a song from some other birds, though more studies need to be done to understand this. This Caledonian crow is solving a water level problem. It adds small blocks into columns of water to raise the water level, allowing it access to food. The crow also had to realize that one column was too wide, so the limited blocks wouldn’t raise the water enough.

Image from video by Logan C, Jelbert S, Breen A, Gray R, Taylor A via Wikimedia Commons. Caledonian crows can solve problems and build tools, and can solve multiple-step puzzles that require a plan. Are these examples of difficult problems? Where do we draw the line to say something is “difficult” enough, or that we’ve given an animal proper motivation to want to even solve one of these problems? Gorillas and chimpanzees have painted pictures of birds, describing (through sign language ) that that is what they were trying to create.

If they had a goal in mind and then made it, is that a sign that they had introspection? That they are describing their own thoughts? And that they are doing it by using their own creativity? Seems like it might be. And animals do appear to feel joy and sorrow.

There are videos out there showing a raven using a piece of plastic to sled down part of a snowy roof. The raven picks it up and slides down over and over again they aren’t playing with another bird, they are enjoying sledding and having fun, perhaps feeling joy. And we continue to learn of more and more species that show sorrow, especially at the loss of members of their family or other loved ones.

Animals that grieve include elephants, wolves, sea lions, magpies, and many more. A recent video of javelinas (peccaries that live in the American southwest) show that they mourn their dead. But we didn’t realize this, until it was captured by a field camera.

So maybe there isn’t that much that makes us uniquely human. Maybe we need to pay more attention to what animals are doing, and try to view the world through their eyes. And, perhaps our ability to consider animal’s feelings and hope for the well-being of these other amazing creatures is our best, and most uniquely human ability.

: How are humans different from other animals?
View complete answer

What makes humans unique from each other?

Introduction – Many differences between individuals are undoubtedly because of differences in their genes. However, human monozygotic twins who are genetically identical may differ markedly from each other ( Spector, 2012 ). Individuals differ, of course, because biological processes are inherently variable.

• Even so, environmentally induced variation is such that understanding the mechanisms underlying plasticity has moved to centre stage of current research.
• The term ‘plasticity’ refers to the changeable character of matter.
• It is used in physics for inanimate materials and in that field it is contrasted with ‘elasticity’.

If a coiled spring is pulled beyond the limits of elasticity, it will be permanently elongated. Provided that the spring does not break, the change is plastic. In the nineteenth century, the term was introduced into medicine to refer to the renewal of injured tissue and into popular literature to refer to impressionable minds.

Behavioural plasticity was a dominant theme of Baldwin’s (1902) book. It has returned in many other works about behaviour and the nervous system (for example, Horn et al., 1973 ; Gollin, 1981 ; Lerner, 1984 ; Rauschecker and Marler, 1987 ). The growth of knowledge about plasticity at all levels of analysis has been astonishing.

The number of papers dealing with plasticity of all types and in all sciences was listed in the Web of Science as 52 in 1970, 299 in 1980, 1354 in 1990, 13 157 in 2000 and 27 826 in 2010 alone. And the numbers published in each year rise at an ever-increasing rate.

1. Nowadays, plasticity, defined broadly in terms of malleability (see Pigliucci, 2001 ) is applied widely in biology with the literature on plasticity in animals diversifying rapidly.
2. In 2011, Neurosciences and Behaviour Reviews carried 12 contributions on resilience, namely the different ways in which animals respond to stress and why they should do so.

In 2012, Integrative and Comparative Biology included 10 essays on various aspects of the impact of plasticity on evolution (see Wund, 2012 ). Kappeler et al. (2013) introduced and summarised a themed issue in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society on flexibility and constraint in the evolution of mammalian social behaviour with 13 contributions.

They emphasised how variation in the components of social systems can depend on the mating system and on social organisation. In a special section of Animal Behaviour, Foster and Sih (2013) introduced 12 contributions on behavioural plasticity and evolution with an excellent overview by Snell-Rood (2013) and with several contributors examining animals’ responses to marked changes in habitats induced by humans.

In my book with Peter Gluckman, we also reviewed the plasticity literature and discussed the many different forms of plasticity, how they might have evolved and how they might affect subsequent evolution (Bateson and Gluckman, 2011). Strikingly, all these extensive and varied contributions to the subject of biological plasticity overlap relatively little in terms of the scientific literature that they cover.

• Anybody who wants to be completely up-to-date has a lot of reading to do in the behavioural field alone.
• In this article, I shall not go over ground that I have covered in detail in previous publications (for example, Bateson, 2012, 2014 ).
• I shall however consider briefly the plastic mechanisms that enable an organism to cope with a novel challenge not previously encountered by the organism’s ancestors.

I shall refer to them collectively as ‘adaptability plasticity’. I shall then consider mechanisms that appear to have evolved from repeated challenges from the environment. They do so by responding in a conditional manner so that if the environment is A, the organism gives response X, and if it is B, the organism gives response Z.
View complete answer

Why human beings are intelligent and different from other animals?

Major Difference Between Human and Animal Brain Humans are considered to be the most intelligent living organisms on earth. Humans have the ability to think and react to situations, whereas, animals do not. Human brain is considered large compared to the animal brain. Let us see the important difference between the human brain and animal brain.
View complete answer

Are humans the smartest animal in the word?

© Kadmy/stock.adobe.com Strictly speaking, humans are the smartest animals on Earth—at least according to human standards. We are adept at all the tasks we’ve established as intelligence indicators, and we have used our smarts to do everything from improving our quality of life as a species and building great societies to achieving scientific advancements such as sending people to the Moon.

But what about the millions of other animal species? How do we rate them? Measuring the intelligence of animals can be difficult because there are so many indicators, including the ability to learn new things, the ability to solve puzzles, the use of tools, and self-awareness. Determining the most intelligent animals can lead to debate—and some surprises.

Consider the octopus, At first glance, it might not appear to be very smart, yet studies have found that certain types of cephalopods possess great curiosity and problem-solving abilities. In one experiment, an octopus figured out how to unscrew a container lid to retrieve the tasty morsel inside.

In another, an octopus learned to recognize human individuals, responding positively to a friendly person while ignoring a person who acted impersonally. The recognition of individuals is a sign of intelligence also shared by pigeons, One might assume that chimpanzees —one of our closest genetic relatives—would rate highly on our intelligence scale, and they do.

In a 2007 study, researchers gave adult chimps, adolescent chimps, and college students the same cognitive test, which involved remembering where nine numbers were located on a touchscreen monitor after seeing the numbers for less than a second. The adult chimpanzees and the college students scored about the same, but the adolescent chimps scored higher, remembering the number positions with far greater accuracy.

1. Goats, like octopuses, have proved to be adept at problem-solving, especially when food is their reward.
2. In one test, goats had to use their teeth to pull a rope down, activating a lever they then had to lift with their mouths.
3. A total of 9 out of 12 goats were able to figure out the contraption after four tries, and the majority still remembered how to work the device 10 months later.

Many animals are effective at using tools, including chimpanzees, which commonly use sticks to extract ants and termite larvae. Crows have demonstrated similar abilities, in one test proving smarter than human children. The test involved a cylinder containing water with a reward floating on top.

• The cylinder was too slender for a crow to reach into with its beak or for a child to insert a hand (children were not allowed to use their thumbs).
• Children under eight years old had a lot of difficulty figuring out the puzzle, but crows seemed to know instinctively that adding pebbles to the cylinder would gradually raise the water level until they could reach the reward.

Elephants, like many other animals, can learn a variety of complicated tasks, but it’s their self-awareness—the ability to recognize themselves in a mirror—that sets them apart on the intelligence scale. (Many other animals, such as dogs and cats, seem to believe their reflection is another animal and react accordingly.) Elephants are also highly social and compassionate, often working together to solve problems within their herd.

Other animals known for their intelligence include pigs, which can solve mazes and learn a symbolic language; rats, which can make decisions based on what they do and don’t know; and bottlenose dolphins, which possess the same degree of self-awareness as elephants. So, determining which animal is the “smartest” really depends on your criteria.

Perhaps a more pressing question is: Are other animals judging our intelligence? And if so, how do we stack up?
View complete answer

Why are human beings the most intelligent living things on earth?

Human intelligence is of a particular kind, strongly connected to language and specific ways to communicate. As this has been supplemented by dexterity we have an advantageous position based on numbers and team, work. Of course human being may be considered as most intelligent creature on this earth.
View complete answer

Why is Man called a social animal class 8?

Why is a human being called a social animal?A. Human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.B. Human beings live in isolation.C. Human beings are indifferent towards the community.D. None of the above Answer Verified Hint: > Social animals are the animals which interact highly with the other animals, usually of their own species.> Sociality refers to the extent of the organization of their social behaviour.> Social attraction is the reason why a human being called a social animal.

Complete answer: Thus, the correct answer is A Note

Option A) Human beings cannot and do not live in isolation – is a correct answer because it is true that human beings cannot and do not live in isolation. Human lives depend on other humans. Human beings live in groups whether they are smaller like a family or larger like a city or a country.Option B) Human beings live in isolation – is an incorrect answer because human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.

Thus, it is incorrect here.Option C) Human beings are indifferent towards the community – is an incorrect answer because it is untrue that human beings are indifferent towards the community. Human beings are called a social animal because human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.Option D) None of the above – is an incorrect answer because the correct answer is human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.The famous Greek Philosopher once said, “Man is by nature a social animal, an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human.” He said this because human beings live in groups whether they are smaller like a family or larger like a city or country.

: Why is a human being called a social animal?A. Human beings cannot and do not live in isolation.B. Human beings live in isolation.C. Human beings are indifferent towards the community.D. None of the above
View complete answer

How did humans become a social species?

Over time, early humans began to gather at hearths and shelters to eat and socialize. As brains became larger and more complex, growing up took longer—requiring more parental care and the protective environment of a home. Expanding social networks led, eventually, to the complex social lives of modern humans.
View complete answer

When did humans become social animals?

(PhysOrg.com) – Humans have evolved to become the most flexible of the primates and being able to live in lots of different social settings sets us apart from non-human primates, suggests research by University of Oxford and the University of Auckland.

• A research paper, published in the journal Nature, has provided important new clues to how humans network and socialise today by exploring the evolutionary history of social groupings among primates.
• The study analysed patterns of social groups among living primates, as well as examining the ‘the root’ of the family tree, in 217 primate species.

The researchers then used Bayesian data modelling to reconstruct the most likely explanation for how the grouping behaviour of primates evolved over 74 million years. Their key finding is that the main step change in social behaviour occurred when primates switched from being mainly active at night to being more active during the day.

Primates started out as solitary foragers as by night they could survive by moving quietly on their own in the dark. However, once they switched to daytime activity, they could be seen and were more vulnerable to attack by predators unless they could show strength in numbers. This research paper provides evidence to show that this switch in activity coincided with a significant change in social behaviour as primates started to ‘gang up’ for the first time.

The researchers conclude that social bonding began as a way of adapting to a new threat. The paper also suggests that primates went directly from being solitary foragers into large, mixed-sex groups where group members were loosely bound together. Members could come and go as needed, suggests the research, which is a behaviour still observed in some primates, like lemurs, today.

The emergence of more stable groups of primates, in which individuals formed clusters that were smaller in size and maintained close social links, is likely to have developed much later says the paper. These findings are significant as they throw into doubt previous theories about the evolution of primate social grouping patterns.

Previous studies have suggested that complex primate social groups were composed of smaller units that stacked up rather like building blocks. Others have suggested that the bond between a mother and daughter later extended to include other related females, and it was this network of relationships that underpinned the social grouping patterns of mammals.

• The data, studied by the research team, included a huge range of social grouping patterns: solitary individuals, family- bonds, pair-bonds, harems, multi-male and multi-female groups.
• The researchers discovered that the bonding behaviour of primates was strongly determined by their ancestors, with closely related species having very similar social behaviour.

Once the transition from individual to group living took place – 52 million years ago in the ancestral line that gave rise to humans, and later in another branch of the primate family tree – no shift back to solitary behaviour ever occurred. Primate ancestors that subsequently began living in pairs did not switch back to group living, whereas those that began living in harems could transition back and forth with large groups.

• There was never a transition directly from pair to harem living or vice versa.
• The researchers conclude that only humans have had the flexibility to live in a range of different, complicated social settings.
• Throughout history, humans have lived in monogamous and polygamous societies; in nuclear family and extended family groups.

Beyond the home, they have socialised in different work settings, as well as being part of the complicated social structure of wider human society. Lead author Dr Susanne Shultz, from the Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology at the University of Oxford, said: ‘There is an amazing flexibility in the way humans have managed to socialise, network and live together, both in groups and wider society.

1. We have a huge variety of social settings to cope with, according to the different cultural practices and customs.
2. This flexibility in the human lineage has not evolved to anything like this level in other primates.
3. Our findings support previous studies that suggest that more brain power is needed for groups that have a more complicated social life.’ Co-author Kit Opie, also from the Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, said: ‘These analyses allow us to look back in time to understand major step changes in social evolution amongst our closest relatives.

We now understand why primate sociality is inherently special, as bonded social groups are unusual in mammals, yet the norm in primates,’ More information: Stepwise evolution of stable sociality in primates, www.nature.com/nature/journal/ ull/nature10601.html Citation : Study reveals clues to how humans became sociable (2011, November 10) retrieved 12 December 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2011-11-reveals-clues-humans-sociable.html This document is subject to copyright.
View complete answer

Who is to say that Man is a social animal and also a political animal?

‘man is by nature a political animal’ ( Aristotle, 1998, 1253a1).
View complete answer