Education Portal for Students in India

Explanation: Education empowers minds that will be able to conceive good thoughts and ideas. Education enables students to do the analysis while making life decisions. Life gives various survival challenges for humans.
View complete answer

Is education considered a way of life?

Answer: Education is considered ‘a way of life’ because in ancient India, there was the existence of both formal and informal modes of education system. Indigenous education was imparted at home, gurukuls, tols, temples, Pathshalas and chatuspadis.
View complete answer

Why is education important to life?

1. Provides Stability – Education provides stability in life, and it’s something that no one can ever take away from you. By being well-educated and holding a college degree, you increase your chances for better career opportunities and open up new doors for yourself.
View complete answer

Why is education considered a way of life class 8?

Exercise – Discuss the following questions in small groups and write your answers.1.) Which salient features of the ancient education system of India made it globally renowned. Answer: The following are the salient features of the ancient education system of India that made it globally renowned-

In ancient India, both formal and informal education was imparted. The system laid emphasis on the overall development of an individual. It focused on the moral, physical, spiritual and intellectual aspects of life. Principles from Vedas and Upanishads were taught and followed which in turn helped in fulfilling duties towards self,family and the society. It focused on learning and physical development, which means it gave importance on the well being of mind and body. The gurus and their shishyas lived together in gurukuls and helped each other in day-to-day life.

2.) Why do you think students from other countries came to India to study at that time? Answer: India is famous for its rich cultural heritage. For travelers India was land of wonder. India’s culture, wealth, religions, philosophies, art, architecture, as well as its educational practices had spread in many other countries and this attracted the students across the world to come to India.

Around the viharas, educational centers of higher learning developed that attracted students from China, Korea,Tibet, Burma, Ceylon, Jav, Nepal and other countries. In ancient times, Takshashila was a noted centre of learning, including religious teachings of Buddhism, for several centuries. It continued to attract students from around the world until its destruction in the 5th century CE.3.) Why is education considered ‘a way of life’? Answer: During ancient times, India had both formal and informal ways of education.

Indigenous education was imparted at home, in temples, pathshalas, tols, chatuspadis and gurukuls. People in homes, villages and temples imparted religious knowledge to the young children. Temples were also key centres of learning and took interest in the promotion of knowledge of our ancient system.

• Teaching was mainly focused on oral and pupils remembered and meditated on what was taught by their gurus.4.) What do you understand by holistic education? Answer: Ancient Indian education didn’t just focused on teaching from the books but it gave importance to overall development of an individual.
• Holistic refers to the development of inner and outer self.

In other words it means to make an individual completely ready in every aspect. Education was free and not centralized. Its foundations were laid in the rich cultural traditions of India thereby helping in the development of the physical, intellectual, spiritual and artistic aspects of life holistically.5.) Why do you think Takshashila and Nalanda have been declared heritage sites? Answer: Takshashila was an ancient Indian city.

• It holds an important place in archeological site and UNESCO declared it to be a World Heritage Site in 1980.It became famous for learning because of its teachers’ expertise.
• Nalanda was one of the oldest universities of the world and UNESCO declared the ruins of Nalanda Mahavihara, a world heritage site.

The courses of study offered by Nalanda University covered a wide range, almost the entire circle of knowledge then available. : NCERT Solutions Class 8 English It So Happened Chapter 11 Ancient Education System of India
View complete answer

Who proposed that education is a way of life?

John Dewey once said ‘Education is not preparation for life; Education is life itself.’ Meaning that learning is an active process that should occur to enhance one ‘s living and understanding thereof.
View complete answer

Is education most important in life?

October 3, 2019 Education is most important part of our life, According to me education means knowledge, knowledge of manner and way of doing and understanding every walk of life. Education is a process through which every uncompleted things have completed.

1. Education makes them reality those things which is seen by people in the dream or imagination.
2. We have lot of problems but we solve them only helping by education.
3. We can get knowledge from everything like earth, sky, bird, tree, human, jungle, animal situation by education system in a proper way for proper development of every aspect because everything could be continued under a system.

But today, education system is not functioning well. Everyone has education right but quality of education has become more difficult to get now a days, because government schools are not providing better education. Education system is responsible for that.

Many schools don’t have good teacher, resources and other management. They don’t understand their duties. In private schools, better educational prospects are provided to students. But for this, they have adequate monetary benefits, resources and teachers. But the people who are poor cannot afford the desired educational prospects due to the lack of monetary resources.

Who is good in finance their children can go private school but who didn’t have money, their children go to government school. Today, there is one more problem in education system that everyone should only marks, doesn’t matter that they got knowledge or not.
View complete answer

Why is education so important in our life essay?

Education certainly determines the quality of an individual’s life. Education improves one’s knowledge, skills and develops the personality and attitude. Most noteworthy, Education affects the chances of employment for people. A highly educated individual is probably very likely to get a good job.
View complete answer

Is education for life or is it a means to an end?

Education is not an end, but a means to an end.2. In other words, we do not educate children only for the purpose of educating them; our purpose is to fit them for life.
View complete answer

Why is education important very short answer?

Educated person has a better understanding of society – Proper education improves people’s understanding of the world around them, making them less susceptible to the influence of others. Proper interpretation of information requires education, as it improves knowledge.

An educated person better understands their own and others’ purpose in society, and their rights. This leads to a better understanding of people, fewer conflicts and more tolerance for differences. Educated persons are harder to manipulate, which is conducive to the development of a more responsible society with fewer conflicts.

All this creates an environment where social justice can thrive, which entails:

Equal rights Equal opportunity Equal treatment

Education in society helps people to be more active in their struggle for a better quality of life. As the citizens’ understanding of the world around them grows, the entire society strives towards more efficient solutions to problems and the advancement of everyday life.
View complete answer

Who claimed that education is a way of life not a preparation for life?

I believe that education, therefore, is a process of living and not a preparation for future living. John Dewey, 1897 In this post we will make the case that public education, which should NOT be privatized (as developed in the last post ), should be rooted in progressive ideals that form the foundation of American democracy. Wordle for this post on progressive education Indeed, John Dewey said more than a 100 years ago that education is a process of living, and not a preparation for the future living. Yet, now, in the year 2012, education goals are almost purely based on “preparing” students for a global economy, and with the skills that will enable them to be “workers” in this economy.

• If you don’t believe me, here is the explanation for why America needs a new set of science standards.
• It comes from the Achieve website Next Generation Science Standards,
• The authors of the site write : In 2007, a Carnegie Foundation commission of distinguished researchers and public and private leaders concluded that “the nation’s capacity to innovate for economic growth and the ability of American workers to thrive in the modern workforce depend on a broad foundation of math and science learning, as do our hopes for preserving a vibrant democracy and the promise of social mobility that lie at the heart of the American dream” ( Carnegie Corporation ).

However, the U.S. system of science and mathematics education is performing far below par and, if left unattended, will leave millions of young Americans unprepared to succeed in a global economy.

Reduction of the United States’ competitive economic edge Lagging achievement of U.S. students Essential preparation for all careers in the modern workforce Scientific and technological literacy for an educated society

Education for all is predicated on the unknown skills and abilities that will be needed in the future. In fact, we have a long history of basing K-12 education on what we think students will need to be worker bees once they are adults. Because of this kind of thinking, we developed an education system based not on the lived experiences and present life of students, but on something adults think they should become.

• We need to think about education using another framework than the conservative (Republicans and Democrats, by the way) framework upon which contemporary education is based.
• The above quote is at the heart of the conservative framework.
• In order to make America more competitive, and have the right preparation for future “unknown” professions we accept experts’ opinions on what content should be learned by all students.

Then we design tests that will measure whether students have learned this content. Using primarily bubble-in type questions, we claim that we can measure student achievement. Presumably, if achievement scores soar, so will our competitive edge, the stock market, the Gross Domestic Product, and overall literacy of society.

It sounds “really” good, doesn’t it. Who could argue with such logic. Increase those test scores, at any cost, and by George, we are home free–robust economy, smart workers, more tax revenue, and on and on. The problem is that this argument is not supported in research on economic growth, job preparation, or whether a nation is ready, able, and competitive.

Come on, your saying. How can this be? Economic competitiveness is not dependent on a singular and very simple variable as student achievement scores. When the economy tanked in 2007, academic scores of American students were continuing to rise (as they have for years).

• The economy went into free fall because of the moral and ethical behavior of adults, nearly all with college degrees, some, indeed with MBAs, and PHDs.
• Iris Rotberg concludes that continuing to use student test scores is not a valid argument to understand a nation’s competitiveness.
• A nation’s competitiveness is too complicated, and affected more so by other variables as identified above.

Rotberg explains as follows: Other variables, such as outsourcing to gain access to lower-wage employees, the climate and incentives for innovation, tax rates, health-care and retirement costs, the extent of government subsidies or partnerships, protectionism, intellectual-property enforcement, natural resources, and exchange rates overwhelm mathematics and science scores in predicting economic competitiveness.

1. This is a very important conclusion.
2. Students are being held accountable for how well they do on a test that supposedly measures the content knowledge that experts think they will need to make them and nation competitive, YET, the research does not support this as shown here, here and here,
3. Alternative to the Conservative and Dominant View of Education Education needs to be public and local, and not privatized and national.

Education should be a process of living, as Dewey said, and not a preparation for future living. The alternative to the conservative view is in George Lakoff’s theory of the “nation-as-family” conceptual metaphor. In Lakoff’s research he has shown that this conceptual metaphor produces two very different models of families: a “strict father” family and a “nurturing parent” family.

In his view this creates two fundamentally different ideologies about how the nation should be governed. I am suggesting that these two views can teach us about how education in America should be organized and “governed.” The “strict father family” is the conservative view, and the “nurturant parent family” is the progressive view.

In his book, Thinking Points, Lakoff identifies the following as characteristics of the Nurturant Parent Family:

A family of preferably two parents, but perhaps only one The parents share household responsibilities (Egalitarian) Open, two-way, mutually respectful communication is crucial Protection is a form of caring, and protection from external dangers takes a significant part of the parents attention The principle goal of nurturance is for children to be fulfilled and happy in their lives When children are respected, nurtured, and communicated with from birth, they gradually enter into a lifetime relationship of mutual respect, communication, and caring for their parents.

In the progressive family, boundaries are set but in the context of building a caring environment with emphasis on building strong, open relationships. According to Lakoff, children develop best through positive relationships with others. Lakoff says that in this context, however, the parent (or teacher) can be authoritative but not authoritarian,

There are added values that emerge from the nurturing parent family and these include, protection, fulfillment in life, freedom, opportunity, fairness, equality, prosperity, and community. There is a direct connection between the nation-as-family conceptual metaphor and the nurturing family which leads to key principles that emerge from progressive values.

These will be fundamental not only in politics, but in education as well. From Lakoff’s theory of nation-as-family conceptual metaphor, these four principles establish the context for progressive morality. Here are summarized from Lakoff, George (2006-10-03).

The Common Good Principle –Citizens bring together their common wealth to build infrastructures that benefit all, and contributes to individual goals. The Expansion of Freedom Principle –Progressives demand the expansion of fundamental forms of freedom, including voting rights, worker’s rights, public education, public health, civil rights. The Human Dignity Principle –Empathy requires the recognition of basic human dignity and responsibility requires us to act to uphold it. The Diversity Principle –Empathy involves identifying with and connecting socially and emotionally with all people regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation. Ethic of diversity in our communities, schools, workplaces.

The progressive view of education based on Lakoff’s theory lead to a school environment that is rooted locally, and for all practical purposes is child-centered, and not content centered. Although I am using Lagoff’s ideas to support the progressive view of eduction, progressive education has a long and storied history in American education.

Progressive education provided an alternative approach to traditional school. It emerged at the end of the 19th Century and reached its peak in the 1930s. Influenced by the writings of John Dewey, and other theorists, progressivism promoted the idea that students should be encouraged to be creative and independent thinkers allowed to act upon their interests.

Progressive educational programs were learner-centered, and encouraged intellectual participation in all spheres of life. Dewey suggested that the Progressive Education Movement appealed to many educators because it was more closely aligned with America’s democratic ideals.

Dewey put it this way: One may safely assume, I suppose, that one thing which has recommended the progressive movement is that it seems more in accord with the democratic ideal to which our people is committed than do the procedures of the traditional school, since the latter have so much of the autocratic about them.

Another thing which has contributed to its favorable reception is that its methods are humane in comparison with the harshness so often attending the policies of the traditional school. (John Dewey. Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books, 1938).

Pp.33-34.) Dewey’s analysis highlights the difference between the progressive and the conservative views of education, and compare with the analysis by George Lakoff. In 1896, the laboratory school of the University of Chicago opened it doors under the directorship of Professor John Dewey. It is still open.

Dewey’s idea was to create an environment for social and pedagogical experimentation. The school was learner-centered, and the curriculum was organized as an interdisciplinary approach to education. Teachers designed activities based on a theory of growth stages, and the activities engaged students in self-development and mutual respect.

Dewey advocated the idea that thinking was an active process involving experimentation and problem solving. He also espoused the idea that the school had a political role as an instrument for social change. Two aspects of the Progressive Education Movement that impacted all of education were the movement’s notion of the child-centered curriculum, and the project method,

Both of these ideas exist today, and have been given different degrees of emphasis. For example, in the late 1960s and 1970s, the child-centered curriculum was represented in the Humanistic Education movement (sometimes known as affective education). The humanistic ideas of the present day were similar to the progressive ideals of the 1930s.

• The child or student-centered approach is a major paradigm implying beliefs about the nature of learning, the goals of education, and the organization of the curriculum.
• Emphasis on student-centeredness has waxed and waned historically as educators evaluated its merits on the ” Back to Basics ” and ” Structure of the (subject matter) Disciplines ” paradigms.

A Couple of Ideas to Think About The progressive education movement represents the earliest efforts to advocate a student-interest-centered instruction. John Dewey in particular wrote extensively of his work in the Chicago school to reconcile the dualism between traditional and progressive education.

1. Teachers still find writings of Dewey to be relevant to current reform efforts and practical dilemmas of teaching.
2. Among hundreds of publications by Dewey, some classical works to consider include How We Think (1910), Democracy and Education (1916), Experience and Education (1938).
3. In these you can find Dewey’s perspective on reflective thinking, learning as growth, and the theory of educative experience.) Student-centered education does NOT mean the end of standards, but it begins with the notion that standards will be locally selected by professional educators who know best the foundations upon which their profession rests, but also understand child development and cognitive science to make the decisions that any other professional would make such as medical doctors and lawyers.

Professional teaching standards are much more important in the progressive education movement because great responsibility for curriculum, instruction and assessment rests with the teacher, and local school (district). The progressive education movement sparked the development of a number of experimental schools, which embodied the philosophy of the progressive educators.

Teaching in the progressive schools was an opportunity to involve students directly with nature, hands-on experiences with real phenomena, and to relate learning to not only the emotional and physical well-being of the child, but to the curriculum as a whole. There is rich literature on this movement describing innovative child-centered programs such as Dewey’s Schools of To-Morrow, the Gary (Indiana) plan, and The Parker School (Cremin, The Transformation of the School ).

The progressive view of education rests on the shoulders of teachers, not experts who live in ivory tower settings, or on the boards of corporate and ideologically based think tanks. The progressive teacher is an educator that Lakoff would describe as having an educational philosophy similar to progressive political world-view.

• The progressive teacher is seen as the authority in the classroom, but does not act on authoritarian principles.
• In a classroom led by a progressive teacher, the teacher is a nurturing parent.
• Students in the progressive classroom are analogous to children in a nurturing family, and they would be respected, nurtured, and encouraged to communicate with peers and the teacher from day one.

The classroom would be viewed as a community of learners, as the family is seen as a community. The progressive teacher’s beliefs about teaching are formulated by many factors, but two that stand out are empathy and responsibility. The progressive teacher would be a highly qualified and certified professional who not only has a strong background in content and pedagogy, but has a range of experiences with youth enabling them to understand students and treat people through the eyes of progressive morality.

Why is our state and district willing to accept a top-down authoritarian set of standards that weren’t developed with our students’ interests or aspirations in mind? Do you know what the research tells us about the ineffectiveness of using high-stakes tests on students achievement? Why does the state department of education have so much authoritative power over the inner workings of every school district in the state? Why aren’t educators involved in the development of curriculum based on the lived experiences of students, and the interests that students might have for getting involved in real work?

The progressive view of education is not a method, but more of a philosophy and way of seeing the world of education in the service of children and youth. What is your view on this statement?: Education is a Process of Living and Not a Preparation for Future Living This blog post has been shared by permission from the author.
View complete answer

Does the education system prepare students to the real life?

School do not prepare us for “the real world.” Schools focus on academic knowledge and teach students to memorize information, and gives them extremely low chances to learn critical life skills. Schools focus on preparing them for universities, but not for jobs and real life.

• It doesn’t teach them how to manage money, how to negotiate, how to communicate.
• It doesn’t teach personal growth, emotional intelligence and positive thinking.
• Also, not all parents are qualified to teach “life” skills to their kids and schools would have been great to provide the same standards and skills in a universal way.

Of course, students need math, algebra and geometry. But every course stays within theory. That doesn’t teach them skills for financial success, money management. Students don’t learn how the stock markets works, how investment or insurance really work in real world.

Students learn geography and history, but they don’t really understand the current world and it’s complex geopolitics. Another example is that no curriculum in any schools offer programming for students, although these skills became part of the world’s most demanded jobs. Hence, we start seeing some Programming boot camps here and there, or independent private coding schools focusing on this.

But of course these are formats that aren’t accessible for all students in a fair and standardized way. Teaching real-life skills should be mandatory in schools, We believe that schools must prepare all students for success by giving them the skills they need to become productive adults, and make sure they are equipping the tomorrow’s workforce in an efficient way.
View complete answer

What philosophers says about education?

Educational Philosophy Quotes Quotes tagged as “educational-philosophy” Showing 1-30 of 806 “Formal education teaches how to stand, but to see the rainbow you must come out and walk many steps on your own.” ― Amit Ray, “No one can build you the bridge on which you, and only you, must cross the river of life.

There may be countless trails and bridges and demigods who would gladly carry you across; but only at the price of pawning and forgoing yourself. There is one path in the world that none can walk but you. Where does it lead? Don’t ask, walk!” ― Friedrich Nietzsche, “Education is beautification of the inner world and the outer world.” ― Amit Ray, “The possibility of the dream gives strength.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “Education is not to be viewed as something like filling a vessel with water but, rather, assisting a flower to grow in its own way” ― Bertrand Russell “It is great to do what you love but greater with the great team.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “The path of light is the quest for knowledge.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “Have faith that your child’s brain is an evolving planet that rotates at its own speed.

It will naturally be attracted to or repel certain subjects.” ― Suzy Kassem, “Self learner; reading.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “The strength of every individual is the grace for great work.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “The more you learn, the more you want to learn.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “You have to conquer every obstacle, before you can reach the top of the mountain.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “With positive attitude, you can graciously overcome every adversity.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “Seekers of wisdom, seekers of life.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “First knowledge is the knowledge of God.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “Keep exploring, you will discover new path.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “With a decision and a defined purpose, you can begin work.” ― Lailah Gifty Akita, “Education is needed, but not mere education of the head, What’s really needed is education of the whole being.

It is easy to fill the head with facts and figures, Use a fact to lift the world, then you’re an educated being.” ― Abhijit Naskar, “Education of the heart, which is compassion and empathy, is very important in our life, we extend this compassion to all other living beings more thoroughly, it makes us more human.” ― Angie karan “Education Through Excellence (The Sonnet)During my aimless years I once had an urge,To learn about jet propulsion engine.So I wrote content for tech support websites,To buy a couple of books on aeronautics.Education means catering to curiosity,Study to gain excellence not a certificate.If it doesn’t open your eyes to social ascension,Education only causes the world to dehydrate.You can stuff entire encyclopedias into your head,That still will not make you an educated being.If education was the same thing as information,Google would be the omniscient superbeing.Certificate without humanity is a ticket to stoneage.If it takes away your warmth, it is all decadence.” ― Abhijit Naskar, “We may take as our guide here John Dewey’s observation that the content of a lesson is the least important thing about learning.

As he wrote in Experience and Education: “Perhaps the greatest of all pedagogical fallacies is the notion that a person learns only what he “is studying at the time. Collateral learning in the way of formation of enduring attitudes, may be and often is more important than the spelling lesson or lesson in geography or history.
View complete answer

How does education impact your life?

Benefits of Education are Societal and Personal – Those who get an education have higher incomes, have more opportunities in their lives, and tend to be healthier. Societies benefit as well. Societies with high rates of education completion have lower crime, better overall health, and civic involvement.
View complete answer

How much education is important in our life?

Education is important because: 1- Good education paves the path to a successful career for an individual.2- Education helps to enhance the self-confidence of a person.3- Good education is essential for a skilled workforce which contributes to the national economy.
View complete answer

Is education for life or is it a means to an end?

Education is not an end, but a means to an end.2. In other words, we do not educate children only for the purpose of educating them; our purpose is to fit them for life.
View complete answer

Is education key to a good life?

2. It helps to make the world a better place – As you gain your education, you’ll be gaining a deeper understanding of what’s right, wrong, fair and unfair. As you develop your reasoning and critical thinking skills, you’ll be able to apply these skills to situations in your life.
View complete answer

Is education a key to a successful life?

Education is the key factor for success. Education gives us knowledge of skills and ethics that has been there in the world which we learn as it helps us to progress further. Nowadays, education is thought of as a way of life where one can not only learn but also share their knowledge with others.
View complete answer