Importance Of Value In Education?

0 Comments

Importance Of Value In Education
THE AIMS OF VALUES EDUCATION – This concept is about the educational process that instils moral standards to create more civil and democratic societies. Values education therefore promotes tolerance and understanding above and beyond our political, cultural and religious differences, putting special emphasis on the defence of human rights, the protection of ethnic minorities and the most vulnerable groups, and the conservation of the environment. Characteristics of values education.
View complete answer

Why moral values are important for students?

What is the Importance of Moral Values in Students’ Life? – Moral values play an essential role in any student’s life. They help build a positive character with traits such as compassion, respect, kindness, and humility. They can make students distinguish between right and wrong or good and bad. And it can eventually promote rational thinking and unbiased judgement among students.

  • Inculcating moral values to students in the longer run works as a moral compass that helps them stay off the negative influence of peers, social media, or society in general, as they grow into teens and then into adults.
  • Moral values also help in shaping students’ attitudes and beliefs towards various aspects of life and provide them with a unique perspective.
  • They may also help in boosting their self confidence and help them stay positive in difficult situations.

View complete answer

What is the conclusion of values in education?

Conclusion – In conclusion, value education is an important aspect of personal and social development. It focuses on teaching and promoting universal values, such as honesty, compassion, and respect, to help individuals become responsible and ethical members of society.
View complete answer

What is the importance of values integration in teaching?

Skip to content Importance Of Value In Education Value Integration Fatima Syed 2022-03-09T12:06:13+08:00 Values integration is more than just teaching the students what is right. Rather, it is about promoting positive perceptions of life among the students. These include the following areas:

Understanding learning and working hard as acts of worship. To love and forgive each other for the sake of Allah (SWT). To love for others what you love for yourself. Modesty in dress and actions always.

Through education, we achieve enlightenment. The idea is to facilitate our students in reaching a point where they can make informed decisions. These decisions then become the guiding influences of their lives. The Australian Islamic College aims to equip students to make such enlightened decisions based on a broader awareness of the needs of society.

With a broader understanding of our culture and faith, our students can appreciate the positive contribution they can make to society. Through values integration, our next generation of children will know how to deal with the ever-changing world while maintaining proper conduct and morals. Values Integration is about teaching students how to use their knowledge to better themselves and the society.

We are not concerned with what the world can offer us but with what we can offer the world to make it a safe, better place. We want to teach our students God-consciousness and morality as they are the foundations of a healthy society. AIC hopes to train a future generation of students who will not only graduate with strong academic achievements but also with a strong commitment towards the well-being of the larger world.

  1. Some of our values we stick by include love of knowledge, respect, responsibility, forgiveness, and truthfulness.
  2. We teach our students good conduct and how it is an act of worship.
  3. To strive to achieve one’s full potential should be understood as a duty of each student.
  4. The benefits are far-reaching, providing practical solutions to save society billions of dollars.

Just consider the societal benefits if we raise a generation not involved in consumption of alcohol, illicit drug use, and who have strong work ethics and high morals in dealings with their fellow human beings. To improve and reflect upon moral values and attitudes, students focus on a particular value each week as a theme of the week.

Monday – Friday 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM

Page load link
View complete answer

What are the 5 main values in education?

Values are defined in literature as everything from eternal ideas to behavioral actions. As used here values refer to criteria for determining levels of goodness, worth or beauty. Values are affectively-laden thoughts about objects, ideas, behavior, etc.

  1. That guide behavior, but do not necessarily require it (Rokeach, 1973).
  2. The act of valuing is considered an act of making value judgments, an expression of feeling, or the acquisition of and adherence to a set of principles.
  3. We are covering values as part of the affective system.
  4. However, once they are developed they provide an important filter for selecting input and connecting thoughts and feelings to action and thus could also be included in a discussion of the regulatory system.

Some of the values designated by the SCANS report (Whetzel, 1992) as important for workers in the information age are responsibility, self-esteem, sociability, integrity, and honesty. Huitt (1997) suggests an additional set of important values that are either implied in the SCANS report or are suggested by the writings of futurists or behavioral scientists as important for life success: autonomy, benevolence, compassion, courage, courtesy, honesty, integrity, responsibility, trustworthiness, and truthfulness.

  1. Other lists of core values have been developed.
  2. For example, a group of educators, character education experts, and leaders of youth organizations meeting under the sponsorship of The Josephson Institute of Ethics developed the following list: respect, responsibility, trustworthiness, caring, justice and fairness, and civic virtue and citizenship ( The Character Education Partnership, Inc,, 1996).

The Council for Global Education (1997) asserts the following set of values are either stated or implied in the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights: compassion, courtesy, critical inquiry, due process, equality of opportunity, freedom of thought and action, human worth and dignity, integrity, justice, knowledge, loyalty, objectivity, order, patriotism, rational consent, reasoned argument, respect for other’s rights, responsibility, responsible citizenship, rule of law, tolerance, and truth.

Despite the debate over exactly what are the core values that ought to be taught in schools, the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (1996) suggests it is possible for communities to reach consensus on a set of values that would be appropriate for inclusion in the school curriculum.

Once a community has done so, the next issue is how should one go about the process of teaching values. As a beginning effort in this direction, I have developed a ” Survey of Desired Values, Virtues, and Attributes “. A preliminary study shows considerable overlap in beliefs among preservice and practicing educators ( Huitt, 2003 ).

  • Values Education Values education is an explicit attempt to teach about values and/or valuing.
  • Superka, Ahrens, & Hedstrom (1976) state there are five basic approaches to values education: inculcation, moral development, analysis, values clarification, and action learning,
  • This text was used as the major source for the organization of the following presentation.

Inculcation Most educators viewing values education from the perspective of inculcation see values as socially or culturally accepted standards or rules of behavior. Valuing is therefore considered a process of the student identifying with and accepting the standards or norms of the important individuals and institutions within his society.

The student “incorporates” these values into his or her own value system. These educators take a view of human nature in which the individual is treated, during the inculcation process, as a reactor rather than as an initiator. Extreme advocates such as Talcott Parsons (1951) believe that the needs and goals of society should transcend and even define the needs and goals of the individuals.

However, advocates who consider an individual to be a free, self-fulfilling participant in society tend to inculcate values as well, especially values such as freedom to learn, human dignity, justice, and self-exploration. Both the social- and individualistic-oriented advocates would argue the notion that certain values are universal and absolute.

The source of these values is open to debate. On the one hand some advocates argue they derive from the natural order of the universe; others believe that values originate in an omnipotent Creator. In addition to Parsons (1951), the theoretical work of Sears and his colleagues (1957, 1976) and Whiting (1961) provide support for this position.

More contemporary researchers include Wynne and Ryan (1989, 1992). The materials developed by the Georgia Department of Education (1997), the work of William Bennett (e.g., 1993) and The Character Education Institute (CEI) also promote the inculcation viewpoint.

  1. Moral Development Educators adopting a moral development perspective believe that moral thinking develops in stages through a specific sequence.
  2. This approach is based primarily on the work of Lawrence Kohlberg (1969, 1984) as presented in his 6 stages and 25 “basic moral concepts.” This approach focuses primarily on moral values, such as fairness, justice, equity, and human dignity; other types of values (social, personal, and aesthetic) are usually not considered.
You might be interested:  What Is Work Education And Its Importance?

It is assumed that students invariantly progress developmentally in their thinking about moral issues. They can comprehend one stage above their current primary stage and exposure to the next higher level is essential for enhancing moral development. Educators attempt to stimulate students to develop more complex moral reasoning patterns through the sequential stages. Kohlberg’s view of human nature is similar to that presented in the ideas of other developmental psychologists such as Piaget (1932, 1962), Erikson (1950), and Loevinger et al. (1970). This perspective views the person as an active initiator and a reactor within the context of his or her environment; the individual cannot fully change the environment, but neither can the environment fully mold the individual.

  • A person’s actions are the result of his or her feelings, thoughts, behaviors, and experiences.
  • Although the environment can determine the content of one’s experiences, it cannot determine its form.
  • Genetic structures already inside the person are primarily responsible for the way in which a person internalizes the content, and organizes and transforms it into personally meaningful data.

The moral development technique most often used is to present a hypothetical or factual value dilemma story which is then discussed in small groups. Students are presented with alternative viewpoints within these discussions which is in hypothesized to lead to higher, more developed moral thinking.

  1. The story must present “a real conflict for the central character”, include “a number of moral issues for consideration”, and “generate differences of opinion among students about the appropriate response to the situation.”
  2. A leader who can help to focus the discussion on moral reasoning.
  3. A classroom climate that encourages students to express their moral reasoning freely (Gailbraith & Jones, 1975, p.18).

There is an assumption that values are based on cognitive moral beliefs or concepts. This view would agree with the inculcation assumption that there are universal moral principles, but would contend that values are considered relative to a particular environment or situation and are applied according to the cognitive development of the individual.

  • Gilligan (1977, 1982) critiqued Kohlberg’s work based on his exclusive use of males in his original theoretical work.
  • Based on her study of girls and women, she proposed that females make moral decisions based on the development of the principle of care rather than on justice as Kohlberg had proposed.

Whereas Kohlberg identified autonomous decision making related to abstract principles as the highest form of moral thinking, Gilligan proposed that girls and women are more likely to view relationships as central with a win-win approach to resolving moral conflicts as the highest stage. In addition to the researchers cited above, Sullivan and his colleagues (1953, 1957) also provide support for this view include. Larry Nucci (1989), Director of the Office for Studies in Moral Development and Character Formation at the University of Illinois at Chicago has developed The Moral Development and Education Homepage to promote this approach.

Analysis The analysis approach to values education was developed mainly by social science educators. The approach emphasizes rational thinking and reasoning. The purpose of the analysis approach is to help students use logical thinking and the procedures of scientific investigation in dealing with values issues.

Students are urged to provide verifiable facts about the correctness or value of the topics or issues under investigation. A major assumption is that valuing is the cognitive process of determining and justifying facts and beliefs derived from those facts.

This approach concentrates primarily on social values rather than on the personal moral dilemmas presented in the moral development approach. The rationalist (based on reasoning) and empiricist (based on experience) views of human nature seem to provide the philosophical basis for this approach. Its advocates state that the process of valuing can and should be conducted under the ‘total authority of facts and reason’ (Scriven, 1966, p.232) and ‘guided not by the dictates of the heart and conscience, but by the rules and procedures of logic’ (Bond, 1970, p.81).

The teaching methods used by this approach generally center around individual and group study of social value problems and issues, library and field research, and rational class discussions. These are techniques widely used in social studies instruction.

  1. stating the issues;
  2. questioning and substantiating in the relevance of statements;
  3. applying analogous cases to qualify and refine value positions;
  4. pointing out logical and empirical inconsistencies in arguments;
  5. weighing counter arguments; and
  6. seeking and testing evidence.

A representative instructional model is presented by Metcalf (1971, pp.29-55):

  1. identify and clarify the value question;
  2. assemble purported facts;
  3. assess the truth of purported facts;
  4. clarify the relevance of facts;
  5. arrive at a tentative value decision; and
  6. test the value principle implied in the decision.

Additional support for this approach is provided by Ellis (1962), Kelly (1955), and Pepper (1947). The thinking techniques demonstrated by MindTools is an excellent example of strategies used in this approach. Values Clarification The values clarification approach arose primarily from humanistic psychology and the humanistic education movement as it attempted to implement the ideas and theories of Gordon Allport (1955), Abraham Maslow (1970), Carl Rogers (1969), and others.

The central focus is on helping students use both rational thinking and emotional awareness to examine personal behavior patterns and to clarify and actualize their values. It is believed that valuing is a process of self-actualization, involving the subprocesses of choosing freely from among alternatives, reflecting carefully on the consequences of those alternatives, and prizing, affirming, and acting upon one’s choices.

Values clarification is based predominately on the work of Raths, Harmin & Simon (1978), Simon & Kirschenbaum (1973), and Simon, Howe & Kirschenbaum (1972). Whereas the inculcation approach relies generally on outside standards and the moral development and analysis approaches rely on logical and empirical processes, the values clarification approach relies on an internal cognitive and affective decision making process to decide which values are positive and which are negative.

  1. It is therefore an individualistic rather than a social process of values education.
  2. From this perspective, the individual, if he or she is allowed the opportunity of being free to be his or her true self, makes choices and decisions affected by the internal processes of willing, feeling, thinking, and intending.

It is assumed that through self-awareness, the person enters situations already pointed or set in certain directions. As the individual develops, the making of choices will more often be based on conscious, self-determined thought and feeling. It is advocated that the making of choices, as a free being, which can be confirmed or denied in experience, is a preliminary step in the creation of values (Moustakas, 1966).

Within the clarification framework a person is seen as an initiator of interaction with society and environment. The educator should assist the individual to develop his or her internal processes, thereby allowing them, rather than external factors, to be the prime determinants of human behavior; the individual should be free to change the environment to meet his or her needs.

Methods used in the values clarification approach include large- and small-group discussion; individual and group work; hypothetical, contrived, and real dilemmas; rank orders and forced choices; sensitivity and listening techniques; songs and artwork; games and simulations; and personal journals and interviews; self-analysis worksheet.

A vital component is a leader who does not attempt to influence the selection of values. Like the moral development approach, values clarification assumes that the valuing process is internal and relative, but unlike the inculcation and developmental approaches it does not posit any universal set of appropriate values.

A sevenfold process describing the guidelines of the values clarification approach was formulated by Simon et al. (1972);

  1. choosing from alternatives;
  2. choosing freely;
  3. prizing one’s choice;
  4. affirming one’s choice;
  5. acting upon one’s choice; and
  6. acting repeatedly, over time.

Additional theorists providing support for the values clarification approach include Asch (1952) and G. Murphy (1958). Action Learning The action learning approach is derived from a perspective that valuing includes a process of implementation as well as development.

That is, it is important to move beyond thinking and feeling to acting. The approach is related to the efforts of some social studies educators to emphasize community-based rather than classroom-based learning experiences. In some ways it is the least developed of the five approaches. However, a variety of recent programs have demonstrated the effectiveness of the techniques advocated by this approach (e.g., Cottom, 1996; Gauld, 1993; Solomon et al., 1992).

Advocates of the action learning approach stress the need to provide specific opportunities for learners to act on their values. They see valuing primarily as a process of self-actualization in which individuals consider alternatives; choose freely from among those alternatives; and prize, affirm, and act on their choices.

They place more emphasis on action-taking inside and outside the classroom than is reflected in the moral development, analysis, and values clarification processes. Values are seen to have their source neither in society nor in the individual but in the interaction between the person and the society; the individual cannot be described outside of his or her context.

The process of self-actualization, so important to the founders of the values clarification approach, is viewed as being tempered by social factors and group pressures. In this way it is more related to Maslow’s (1971) level of transcendence which he discussed towards the end of his career.

  • Input Phase -a problem is perceived and an attempt is made to understand the situation or problem 1. Identify the problem(s) and state it (them) clearly and concisely 2. State the criteria that will be used to evaluate possible alternatives to the problem as well as the effectiveness of selected solutions; state any identified boundaries of acceptable alternatives, important values or feelings to be considered, or results that should be avoided 3. Gather information or facts relevant to solving the problem or making a decision
  • Processing Phase -alternatives are generated and evaluated and a solution is selected 4. Develop alternatives or possible solutions 5. Evaluate the generated alternatives vis-a-vis the stated criteria 6. Develop a solution that will successfully solve the problem (diagnose possible problems with the solution and implications of these problems; consider the worst that can happen if the solution is implemented; evaluate in terms of overall “feelings” and “values”
  • Output Phase -includes planning for and implementing the solution 7. Develop plan for implementation (sufficiently detailed to allow for successful implementation) 8. Establish methods and criteria for evaluation of implementation and success 9. Implement the solution
  • Review Phase -the solution is evaluated and modifications are made, if necessary 10. Evaluating implementation of the solution (an ongoing process) 11. Evaluating the effectiveness of the solution 12. Modifying the solution in ways suggested by the evaluation process
You might be interested:  Who Was The Chief Supporter Of Free Discipline In Education?

Many of the teaching methods of similar to those used in analysis and values clarification, In fact, the first two phases of Huitt’s model are almost identical to the steps used in analysis. In some ways the skill practice in group organization and interpersonal relations and action projects is similar to that of Kohlberg’s “Just School” program that provides opportunities to engage in individual and group action in school and community (Power, Higgins & Kohlberg, 1989).

A major difference is that the action learning approach does not start from a preconceived notion of moral development. Schools of thought providing support for the action learning approach include: Adler, 1924; Bigge, 1971; Blumer, 1969; Dewey, 1939; Horney, 1950; Lewin, 1935; and Sullivan, 1953. The Values in Action and the Giraffe projects exemplify this approach.

Summary In summary, each of the approaches to values education has a view of human nature, as well as purposes, processes and methods used in the approach. For example, the inculcation approach has a basic view of human nature as a reactive organism. The analysis and values clarification approaches, on the other hand, view the human being as primarily active.

Overview of Typology of Values Education Approaches
Approach Purpose Methods
Inculcation
  • To instill or internalize certain values in students;
  • To change the values of students so they more nearly reflect certain desired values
  • Modeling;
  • Positive and negative reinforcement;
  • Manipulating alternatives;
  • Games and simulations;
  • Role playing
Moral Development
  • To help students develop more complex moral reasoning patterns based on a higher set of values;
  • To urge students to discuss the reasons for their value choices and positions, not merely to share with others, but to foster change in the stages of reasoning of students
  • Moral dilemma episodes with small-group discussion;
  • Relatively structured and argumentative without necessarily coming to a “right” answer
Analysis
  • To help students use logical thinking and scientific investigation to decide value issues and questions
  • To help students use rational, analytical processes in interrelating and conceptualizing their values
  • Structured rational discussion that demands application of reasons as well as evidence;
  • Testing principles;
  • Analyzing analogous cases;
  • Research and debate
Values Clarification
  • To help students become aware of and identify their own values and those of others;
  • To help students communicate openly and honestly with others about their values;
  • To help students use both rational thinking and emotional awareness to examine their personal feelings, values, and behavior patterns
  • Role-playing games;
  • Simulations;
  • Contrived or real value-laden situations;
  • In-depth self-analysis exercises;
  • Sensitivity activities;
  • Out-of-class activities;
  • Small group discussions
Action Learning
  • Those purposes listed for analysis and values clarification;
  • To provide students with opportunities for personal and social action based on their values;
  • To encourage students to view themselves as personal-social interactive beings, not fully autonomous, but members of a community or social system
  • Methods listed for analysis and values clarification;
  • Projects within school and community practice;
  • Skill practice in group organizing and interpersonal relations

References

  • Adler, A. (1924). The practice and theory of individual psychology, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Allport, G. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Asch, S. (1952). Social psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (1996). Schools as partners in character development (Press release). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved December 1997, from http://www.ascd.org/today/position/part.html,
  • Bennet, W. (Ed.). (1993). The book of virtues: A treasury of great moral stories, New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Bigge, M. (1971). Positive relativism: An emergent educational philosophy, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symboic interactionism: Perspective and method, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bond, D. (1970). An analysis of valuation strategies in social science education materials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Berkeley, CA: School of Education, University of California.
  • Brown, L., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development, New York: Ballantine Books.
  • Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol II). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Cottom, C. (1996). A bold experiment in teaching values. Educational Leadership, 53 (8), 54-58.
  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy, New York: Lyle Stuart.
  • Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and society, New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Gailbraith, R., & Jones, T. (1975, January). Teaching strategies for moral dilemmas: An application of Kohlberg’s theory of moral development to the social studies classroom. Social Education, 39, 16-22.
  • Gauld, J. (1993). Character first: The Hyde school difference, San Francisco: ICS Press.
  • Georgia Department of Education. (1997). Values education implementation guide, Atlanta, GA: Office of Instructional Services, Georgia Department of Education. Retrieved December 1997, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/affsys/valuesga.html,
  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptualizations of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 481-517.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Huitt, W. (1992). Problem solving and decision making: Consideration of individual differences using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 33-44. Retrieved December 1997, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/papers/prbsmbti.html,
  • Huitt, W. (1997). The SCANS report revisited, Paper delivered at the Fifth Annual Gulf South Business and Vocational Education Conference, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, April 18. Retrieved December 1997, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/student/scanspap.html,
  • Huitt, W. (2003). Important values for school-aged children and youth: A preliminary report, Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved December 2003, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/brilstar/valuesreport.html,
  • Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs, New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research, Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development, San Francisco: Harper & Row.
  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Loevinger, J. et al. (1970). Measuring ego development, Volumes I and II. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Maslow, A. (1970). Toward a psychology of being, Princetion, NJ: Viking.
  • Maslow, A.(1971). The farther reaches of human nature, New York: Viking Press.
  • Metcalf, L. (Ed.). (1971). Values education: Rationale strategies and procedures,41st Yearbook of the National Council for the Social Studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
  • Moustakas, C. (1966). The authentic teacher: Sensitivity and awareness in the classroom, Cambridge, MA: Howard A. Doyle.
  • Murphy, G. (1958). Human potentialities, New York: Basic Books.
  • Nucci, L. (Ed.). (1989). Moral development and character education: A dialogue, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Pepper, S. (1958). The sources of value, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1932, 1962). The moral judgment of the child, New York: Collier.
  • Power, C., Higgens, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). The habit of the common life: Building character through democratic community schools. In L. Nucci (Ed.), (1989). Moral development and character education: A dialogue (125-143). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
  • Raths, L., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. (1978). Values and teaching: Working with values in the classroom (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  • Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn, Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values, New York: Free Press.
  • Scriven, M. (1966). Primary philosophy, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sears, R., Maccoby, E., & Levin, H. (in collaboration with E. Lowell, P. Sears, & J.Whiting. (1957, 1976). Patterns of child rearing, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Simon, S., Howe, L., & Kirschenbaum, H. (1972). Values clarification: A handbook of practical strategies for teachers and students, New York: Hart.
  • Simon, S., & Kirschenbaum, H. (Eds.). (1973). Readings in values clarifications, Minneapolis, MN: Winston.
  • Solomon, D., Schaps, E. Watson, M, & Battistich, V. (1992). Creating caring school and classroom communities for all student. In R. Villa, J. Thousand, W. Stainback, & S. Stainback. F rom restructuring for caring and effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. Retrieved December 1997, from http://www.quasar.ualberta.ca/ddc/incl/solomon.htm,
  • Sullivan, H.S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry, New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Sullivan, H.S., Grant, M., & Grant, J. (1953). The development of interpersonal maturity: Applications of delinquency. Psychiatry, 20, 373-385.
  • Superka, D., Ahrens, C., & Hedstrom, J. (1976). Values education sourcebook, Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
  • The Character Education Partnership, Inc. (1996). Character education in U.S. schools: The new consensus (Book excerpt).U.S. News and World Report On-line. Retrieved December 1997, from http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/betsy2.htm,
  • The Council for Global Education. (1997). Moral education: A parent’s questionnaire, Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved, December 1997, from http://www.globaleducation.org/,
  • Walker, L. (1991). Sex differences in moral reasoning. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development ( Vol 2, pp.333-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Whetzel.D. (1992). The Secretary of Labor’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, ERIC Digest. Retrieved December 1997, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/ files/scansrpt.html,
  • Whiting, J. (1961). Socialization process and personality. In F. Hsu (Ed.), Psychological anthropology (355-399). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
  • Wynne, E. (1989). Transmitting traditional values in contemporary schools. In L. Nucci, Moral development and character education: A dialogue (pp.19-36). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corp.
  • Wynne, E., & Ryan, K. (1992). Reclaiming our schools: A handbook on teaching character, academics, and discipline. New York: Merrill.
You might be interested:  Ias Pooja Singhal Education Qualification?

View complete answer

What is the value for education?

Importance of Education Education makes people independent. Furthermore, it increases knowledge, strengthens the mind, and forms character. Moreover, education enables people to put their potentials to optimum use. Education is also a type of reform for the human mind.
View complete answer

What is moral values in education?

Moral values are defined as guidelines that assist a person in deciding between right and wrong. In order to create honest, credible, and fair judgments and relationships in daily life, the awareness of one’s morals – along with self-awareness – is crucial.

  • The development of moral values is a necessary process that should begin in childhood.
  • Moral values in children can set them on the right path, helping them form a pleasant personality combined with a strong character.
  • Besides the child’s family, schools are critical in guiding, supporting, and holding their hands as they navigate the landscape of moral values.

From an early age, it is important to inculcate good moral values and an upright moral compass in every child or student, encouraging good behaviour, and knowing how to tell right from wrong is something we owe to our children. We believe that’s the key to making the world and the society we live in a better place.
View complete answer

Why values can inspire education?

Value education also helps the students to become more and more responsible and sensible. It helps them to understand the perspective of life in a better way and lead a successful life as a responsible citizen. It also helps students to develop a strong relationship with family and friends.
View complete answer

What are the learning outcomes of value education?

Objective of Value Education: – Main objective of value education is to include the essential values depending upon the objectives, they may be individual, social and national values for example in India, Maharashtra State has adopted the following values to be inculcated among the student through education.

  • They are namely sensitivity, punctuality, neatness, scientific attitude, dignity of labour, sportsmanship, equality, brotherhood, patriotism, secularism, cooperation, tolerance, respect for elder, non-violence, national integrity, universal brotherhood.
  • An education system interlinked with our cultural heritage on one hand and economic and scientific, development on the other is only viable medium to take us successfully ahead towards 21st century.

It is universal outlook that leads to the banishment of all evil influences may they be superstitions, hatreds or intolerance. World is becoming one, we are heading towards establishment of a global civilization an we contemplate of one government in future.

  1. When the differences of east and west would perish and values of like would be universalized.
  2. According to John Dewey “Value primarily means to prize, to esteem, to apprise, to estimate, it means the act of cherishing something’s, holding it dear and also act of passing judgement upon the nature and amounts of values as compared with something else”.

Values are the part and parcel of the philosophy of the nation and its educational system. Values are guiding principles of life, which are conductive to one’s physical, social and mental health. Inculcation of desirable values is felt necessary through the education and for this purpose teachers, the educational institutions and society in general should be prepared.

It has been observed that there is an erosion of social and moral values of system. The Indian psyche is deeply embedded in spiritual value system drawn from thousands of years of common cultural heritage and educational system devoid of cultural values is not hollow in content but unsuitable as well.

The values of culture and that of science are to be integrated proportionately in such a way that culture will act as a catalyst to sharpen the scientific temperament of nation’s youth. The educational system should ensure aesthetic and qualitative life to its citizen besides achieving the economic and scientific targets.
View complete answer

How do we develop our values?

What are personal values, anyway? – Put simply, values are something your care about deeply. They’re central to your identity because they’re what matters most to you in life. When you value your family, you care about making time for them in your life.

The same is true if you value your hobbies or career. But you might not realize how your values influence your day-to-day life. They can affect your decisions, interactions with other people, and how you relate to the rest of the world. Your values, along with your beliefs and attitudes, create the moral, guiding principles you follow.

Here’s how they interact with each other :

Beliefs are the ideas you accept as true, whether supported by facts or not. For example, you may believe in the importance of honesty above all other qualities, or that stealing is wrong, regardless of the circumstances. Your faith, culture, education, mentors, and personal experiences heavily influence your beliefs, and they can change over time. Your belief system then impacts your personal values, These are the things you identify as important to your personal well-being. If your parents raised you under a certain religion, spirituality may become a core value in your life. From your values system comes your attitudes, This is how you treat others and approach situations. If you believe money is the key to human welfare, and you might approach your job solely as a means to earn a living. Attitudes then translate into behaviors. Theoretically, your behaviors should act in accordance with your beliefs, values, and attitudes. If environmental conservation is important to you, you might devote your life to studying marine biology. At the very least, you’ll incorporate “green” habits into your life, like recycling or composting. These behaviors reflect what matters most to you.

Here are some examples of personal values, which can influence their attitudes and behaviors:

Dependability Honesty Human rights Professional development Human life Climate activism Generosity Integrity

BetterUp can help you start making choices that align to your values so you can live by your values. Together with a coach, you can paint a picture of what a more aligned life would look like and make a plan to get there. Importance Of Value In Education
View complete answer

What is importance of teaching values essay?

It helps in taking the right decisions in difficult situations thus improving decision-making abilities. It inculcates students with essential values like kindness, compassion and empathy. It awakens curiosity in children developing their values and interests. This further helps in skill development in students.
View complete answer

What is the importance of good values in life?

Why is it important to have values? – “If you don’t have a dream, how you gonna make a dream come true?” – as the old song goes. Values help us create the future we want – because knowing what you want out of life is the first step to getting it. But values do so much more.

They help grow and develop as people. They motivate us, give us a reason to get up in the morning, and give our lives meaning. Values help us live with direction and purpose – like a guiding compass. Whatever is going on in our lives, our values can show us a path forward, and help us make better choices.

Values are also intimately linked to our sense of self, and they’re essential for our mental health. They create feelings of happiness, satisfaction and fulfilment, and help us develop healthy patterns of behaviour. They also connect us to other people – whether individuals, groups or communities – and help us develop meaningful relationships with them.

Living in line with our values has a direct impact on how we feel about ourselves. When we’re aligned with our values, we tend to be happier, more confident and more fulfilled. Research shows that just thinking about our values keeps our stress levels low, and helps us feel more content. But when there’s a mismatch, we tend to be less happy and more stressed.

For example, have you ever been in a situation where someone said or did something that you strongly disagreed with, but you didn’t speak out – and then you felt bad afterwards? When your behaviour doesn’t match your values, you may experience a drop in self-esteem, difficulty making decisions, anxiety, stress or depression,
View complete answer