Education Portal for Students in India

Advocate and Spread Awareness – The only way in which we could increase the number of students getting their education is to advocate for them. We have to raise awareness about the importance and significance of education. Speak to parents and communities and tell them, by educating the children, we have a chance to improve their lifestyle and future. credits: thehansindia.com NGO’s like offers fellowships to graduate students to teach under-privileged kids countrywide. This initiative helps in proving mentors to kids and helps them getter a better perspective of what they would do in the future. If you are passionate about teaching, research on fellowships like this and sign up.

1. It would be an experience that you and the kids would cherish.
2. These are a few ways in which we could help the future citizens get the education they deserve.
3. This way, we are not only helping with their education, but also with their entire future.
4. Teaching is a rewarding and noble work; it is a stepping stone to developing the country.

: 4 Simple Ways to Achieve Quality Education
View complete answer

How can we promote the importance of education?

Volunteer with or mentor younger students – Education plays an important role in one’s life, especially at a young age. It helps shape the future course of life. Volunteering your time and help is a great way to help ensure every child receives a quality education.

1. Discover more opportunities to volunteer your time to support children’s education.
2. If you are still in school yourself, there may be a program at your school designed to support younger students.
3. If you’re a student, you can tutor others in your free time or mentor other students to help them realize their full potential.

Ask your school what opportunities are available to you.
View complete answer

How can we promote quality education in the Philippines?

Improving quality of Philippine education – Part 2 Agenda 2 has to do with improving the quality of instruction and teachers with the target that all learners meet basic skills based on international standards. Teachers should be trained for their empowerment as well as for the creation of context-based learning materials.

1. Strengthen the implementation of the Instructional Supervision Framework and Middle Leadership Development for Teachers.
2. As regard systems and structural improvement, the objective is to attain quality teacher education programs rather than focusing on quantity.
3. There should be reforms in teacher certification, hiring, distribution and promotion of teachers.

Continuing professional development should be made available to teachers. Priority should be given to developing large pool of early childhood educators. Agenda 3 refers to the work place itself. This is where employers can play an important role in complementing the educational system in the improvement of the quality of education.

1. Employers should be incentivized to prioritize professional development and employment facilitation.
2. Through various types of on-the-job training, there should be both abundant opportunities and scholarship for trainees.
3. Especially at the Senior High School (SHS) level, the curriculum should be improved so that the link between schools on one hand the industries and communities on the other can be strengthened.

Beyond the job-related competencies and skills, there should be an equal stress on mentoring trainees on workplace attitudes and ethics well as relational competencies. With the increasing availability of Big Data, there should be improved information on the skills that will be needed in the future.

Career guidance services should be institutionalized in the schools. Expand Alternative Learning Systems (ALS) for dropouts from basic education levels, giving more emphasis to functional literacy and job preparation. Agenda 4 involves fully leveraging private education so as to complement the delivery of services.

With the increasing disparity between the high salaries received by public school teachers and those in the private schools, the coverage of teacher salary subsidy should be expanded to other grade levels, aside from Junior High School (JHS). Subsidy support programs for private education should be expanded, especially the voucher program to cover Kindergarten and grade school, the JHS Education Service Contracting program (larger amount per student) and SHS voucher and Joint-Delivery Voucher Program for SHS Tech-Voc, which should receive larger amounts and wider coverage.

There should be a limit to the creation of new State Universities and Colleges, of LGU-sponsored new programs and campuses so as not to unnecessarily compete with private schools. It must be constantly emphasized that the Constitutional mandate is universal and quality education at the basic education level.

Until this is achieved, there should be fiscal prudence of the State in establishing tertiary educational institutions which should be mainly assigned to the private sector until universal education is attained at the elementary and high school levels.

Finally, Agenda 5 refers to the importance of the National Government devolving more functions to the local government units and school leaders in the local communities under the principle of subsidiarity and as a more practical alternative to federalization. This should also be facilitated with the implementation of the Mandanas-Garcia ruling which will increase the tax revenues being cascaded down to the LGUs from the national government.

Here, there should be a special effort to involve parents more and more in the education of their children, especially at the Kindergarten and elementary school levels. Parents should be encouraged to actively participate in Parents Teachers Associations (PTAs) in school decision making.

Role models like that of the Nanay-Teacher Program of Valenzuela City and the Parents for Education Foundation (PAREF) in the private sector should be held up for emulation. All school governing councils should be made functional by, among other measures, implementing the Philippine Professional Standards for school heads and supervisors.

The members and responsibilities of local school boards should be expanded. Allowed uses of the Special Education Fund (SEF) should be expanded, applying the needs-based approach to the use of the SEF. There should be seminar programs and workshops that will improve the capability of mayors for education governance.

• Student leaders should also be made part of school governance.
• In all of these moves to empower LGU heads, school administrators, parents and student leaders at the local level, there should be a closed monitoring of the increased share of the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) under the Mandanas-Garcia ruling.

The devolved budgets of DepEd, DOH, and DSWD must go to the Local School Boards (LSBs), Local Health Boards, and day care centers. The improvement of the quality of basic education in the Philippines is a herculean task. All these recommendations of the Philippine Business For Education will take time to implement and even more time to yield results.

We must remember, however, that we are dealing with the children and youth whom we are preparing to be the future workers ten to twenty years from now. In the meantime, we should also have to retool, upskill and reskill those who are already in the labor force today and are either unemployed (2.6 million) or underemployed (6.5 million).

These 9.1 million individuals are the ones who should be the targets for non-formal, informal and other means of transferring knowledge and skills outside the formal educational system. We should not waste any time in putting together employers, educational institutions and the government (especially TESDA under DOLE) to help these millions of workers become human resource assets today, not tomorrow.

• They are the very workers who will enable the Philippine economy to transition to an upper-middle income economy in 2023 and a high-income economy during the decade of 2040 to 2050.
• They are the very workers who are needed in today’s engines of growth such as the Build, Build, Build programs of both the public and private sectors, the hospitality industry, the health care industry and especially the whole value chain of the agribusiness sector from farming to post-harvest, logistics, food processing, and food retailing.

These sectors today obviously do need rocket scientists as workers. Even if existing unemployed and underemployed workers are weak in reading comprehension, mathematical literacy and science know how, they can still be upskilled and reskilled in these less intellectually demanding occupations.
View complete answer

What is quality education for all learners?

It is an education in which its curriculum is of great quality and designed to impart relevant skills, knowledge enabling students to gain academic competencies for socio-economic survival.
View complete answer

Why is quality education so important?

Why does education matter? Education enables upward socioeconomic mobility and is a key to escaping poverty. Education helps reduce inequalities and reach gen- der equality and is crucial to fostering tolerance and more peaceful societies.
View complete answer

How can the government improve the quality of education?

Get premium membership and access questions with answers, video lessons as well as revision papers. Date Posted: 1/21/2019 8:39:14 AM Posted By: Milnel Membership Level: Silver Total Points: 367 Education is a natural right entitled to any individual and a critical social and economic development, therefore, an article of trade in financial positions, but it varies from another service because it is a community feature. Education yields in both the private and public sector in terms of learning and higher learning more so, it benefits the society in social ways whereby a farmer may become more creative through literate skills, also a literate woman may be capable in taking good care of her family health needs, lastly an educated individual can exercise the social and political rights as a better citizen. Therefore it is essential for the government to invest in education since it yields progressive externalities. The following are the roles of government in education; The government can subsidize education in several forms including school fees for low-income parents. School fees could be lowered in favor of needy parents and students so that anyone can afford the school fees regardless of the financial status. Education fights poverty in the nation and the society, therefore as the country gives training to its needy citizens the government will be significantly investing in its future economy and status. Since any nation that has got a higher percentage of educated members or elites means that the country is rich. Therefore to eliminate poverty the government has to eradicate illiteracy among its people. Provision of meals in schools by the government could help keep students in schools. Many students fail to show up in schools because of lack of food at their homes; therefore, they fail to show up due to pans of hunger thus, preferring to look for food than going to schools (Friedman, 2015). Students in classes could also lack concentration when it comes to learning and teaching processes; therefore the student fails to understand what is being taught in the classroom. Food could be used to attract many learners to schools. One could be living in a home where there is no food, therefore, and provision of food in schools could capture many students. Parents could also see it wise to take their children to school because they are sure of the well-being of their students since hunger problems could be catered for thus smooth learning. Providing equality in education whereby the government ensures that the public schools offer a high quality of knowledge to the learners. The private school has always given competition to public school by acquiring high grades in their examinations thus attracting more investors in their business compared to the public (Horn and Paslov, 2014). Private schooling has, therefore, remained out of reach for the majority since the private sector is driven by the profit gains thus exploiting parents. Therefore the government should make sure that the private sector realizes that education is an essential business for the government and it is accountable for it. More so, the Government also ensures that the teacher it employs to serve public schools should be well trained and experienced to lower the competition in the quality of results attained. Therefore as the public could be able to compete favorably with the private sector, the parents that could not be able to pay fees could have a sigh of relief (Ranson and Tomlinson 2018). Parents who could be investing in the private sector could withdraw and start investing in the public raising economy of the government. Provision of free education could also help the needy people and the less fortunate in the country. School should be taken as the universal factor or necessity and a need for every individual. Every student who comes from poor background will be able to access education as any other student or person because the class levels could have been removed. Therefore, every student could be running for equal opportunities nationwide and as result inferiority in education could have been dismissed (Landry and Neubauer, 2016). Percentage of school dropouts in the country due to school fees could be minimized since anyone could learn freely without spending more. Free education also increases the literacy level in the country thus education development. A government should ensure that teachers are well paid so that they are motivated in the provision of their services. Teachers employed in the government sectors are mostly underpaid while they are overworked on the other hand. Underpayments make teachers lose morale in their work and could even make them provide inferior services to the learners, which could yield poor performance. Government act of ensuring that teachers are catered for well at all cost will give the public education an upper hand in its functioning. The private sector mostly outshines the public because it takes care of its employees. Thus they are well paid well in that the salary is proportional to their work (Horn and Paslov, 2014). More so, the teachers in the private sector are always paid on time and with minimum chances of delayed payments, whereas the public operates on late payment of its teachers. Therefore, teachers could get no reason for teaching to work on other projects for money. Besides, the teachers should be motivated whenever there is a significant improvement in their teaching fields (Landry and Neubauer, 2016). Motivated teachers could always double their effort and compete between one another so that they are still motivated. Therefore the teachers will work towards achieving the best in the learning outcomes not just teaching for the sake of earning and finishing the syllabus. Consequently, the education performance would be improving day in day out and shining all times. A government should put in place rules that could check to eliminate outdated syllabus since it misdirects many teachers and learners in schools (Friedman, 2015). The wrong outline could lead to improper planning and schedules in the teaching and learning activities, therefore leading to wrong services delivered to learners throughout. Effective syllabus acts as a tool for excellent performance in schools since the teacher teaches what is tested nationally. More so, the correct plan would put all activities n truck. Learners could be able to compete with other students elsewhere since they are subjected to the same thing and if the comparison can be made, it will be fair to all the learners. The wrong syllabus misdirects the whole school failing most candidates because they waste time tackling what is not tested. Frequent checking of the program could help students reach for excellent performance and desired goals since they will be working on the right lane (Ranson and Tomlinson 2018). A government should ensure that private institutions interested in carrying out educational activities meet certain standards. Private sectors mostly run for profit gains and not what they are licensed to do. Management in the private sector could be weak, in that the school could lack infrastructure, teaching and learning textbooks and even playgrounds. Also, education cannot be in the classroom alone since people are talented in different fields. Therefore, the government should make sure it checks out to make sure that the private institution is fit for learning and all that the institution could partake (Horn and Paslov, 2014). Furthermore, the government should ensure that the set fees in the private institutions are not higher than usual in such a way that the parents are discriminated. Fees should, therefore, be affordable by parents since other institution should be set higher prices for profit gains and also taking advantages of parents who are weak to bargain. A government should act towards empowering school leaders and teachers towards professional responsibility and set standards and support them wholly in a quest to deliver quality learning prospects for the learners. Teachers need to be trained so that they can manage well in the school setting. Since without qualifying one is regarded as not restricted, therefore, he or she cannot take roles to lead or teach students (Friedman, 2015). Thus, the government should make it mandatory for anyone who wants to train to have passed through specialized training. Also, the government should establish training centers to cater for teachers training. Presence of training centers could motivate teachers to even further their educations to the higher level, and after that be able to give back to the community as qualified personnel. Reference Friedman, M. (2015). The Role of Government in Education (1955). The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice RSS.< http://www. Edchoice. Org/The-Friedmans/The-Friedmans-on-School-Choice/The-Role-of-Government-in-Education, 281995, 29. Horn, L., & Paslov, J. (2014). Trends in student financing of undergraduate education: Selected years, 1995-96 to 2011-12. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Google Scholar. Landry, L., & Neubauer, D. (2016). The role of the government in providing access to higher education: the case of government-sponsored financial aid in the US. Journal of Education and Work, 29(1), 64-76. Ranson, S., & Tomlinson, J. (2018). The changing government of education. Routledge. Next: Ridiculos Life in Ghetto Previous: Deming's 14 Points of Management

Grady A. Lowry