How Much India Spend On Education?
India Education Spending 1997-2022 General government expenditure on education (current, capital, and transfers) is expressed as a percentage of total general government expenditure on all sectors (including health, education, social services, etc.).
India education spending for 2020 was 16.54%, a 0.19% decline from 2019. India education spending for 2019 was 16.73%, a 0.09% increase from 2018. India education spending for 2018 was 16.64%, a 0.83% increase from 2017. India education spending for 2017 was 15.81%, a 0.09% increase from 2016.
| India Education Spending – Historical Data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Year | Education Spending (% of GDP) | Annual Change |
| 2020 | 16.54% | -0.19% |
| 2019 | 16.73% | 0.09% |
| 2018 | 16.64% | 0.83% |
| 2017 | 15.81% | 0.09% |
| 2016 | 15.72% | 0.03% |
| 2015 | 15.69% | 1.64% |
| 2013 | 14.05% | 0.06% |
| 2012 | 13.99% | 0.43% |
| 2011 | 13.56% | 1.73% |
| 2010 | 11.83% | 0.64% |
| 2009 | 11.19% | -0.50% |
| 2006 | 11.69% | 0.49% |
| 2005 | 11.21% | 0.01% |
| 2004 | 11.20% | -1.21% |
| 2003 | 12.41% | -4.32% |
| 2000 | 16.73% | -0.23% |
| 1999 | 16.96% | 2.80% |
| 1998 | 14.16% | 0.84% |
| 1997 | 13.32% | 0.84% |
India Education Spending 1997-2022
View complete answer
Contents
- 1 How much does Indian govt spend on education?
- 2 How big is education industry in India?
- 3 Does India pay for education?
- 4 How Indian education system was destroyed?
- 5 What percentage of GDP is spent on healthcare in India 2022?
- 6 What percentage of GDP Pakistan spend on education?
How much of India’s GDP is spent on education?
What percentage of GDP is spent on education in India? Option 1 : About three percent Free 150 Questions 150 Marks 150 Mins
The percentage of ‘education expenditure’ over ‘total government expenditure’ indicates the importance of education in the scheme of things before the government. The percentage of ‘ education expenditure of GDP ‘ expresses how much of people’s income is being committed to the development of education in the country. The basic purpose of Planning in India is to widen people’s choices and improve the well-being of the people. The percentage of spending from the government is a reflection of the value the Indian government places on education.
Key Points GDP on Education:
Elementary education takes a major share of total education expenditure in the country. The share of higher education (institutions of higher learning like colleges, polytechnics and universities) is the least. The Economic Survey 2019-20 noted that the expenditure on education by the centre and the states as a proportion of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has been around 3% between 2014-15 to 2018-19. The National Policy on Education 1968 recommended the spending on Education to be 6% of GDP. National Education Policy, 2020 (NEP) reaffirms the recommendation of increasing public investment in education to 6% of GDP.
Thus, about three percent of GDP is spent on education in India. India’s #1 Learning Platform Start Complete Exam Preparation Daily Live MasterClasses Practice Question Bank Mock Tests & Quizzes Trusted by 3.4 Crore+ Students : What percentage of GDP is spent on education in India?
View complete answer
How much does Indian govt spend on education?
For 2022-23, the budget for school education spending is GBP 6 bn (INR 63,449 crore) and has increased by 22 per cent over its previous year’s revised allocation. The higher education budget has also increased by 13 per cent over its previous year’s allocation and is GBP 4 bn (INR 40,828 crore).
View complete answer
How big is education industry in India?
Society Education & Science
Premium Premium statistics Industry-specific and extensively researched technical data (partially from exclusive partnerships). A paid subscription is required for full access. Published by Sep 12, 2022 In financial year 2020, the market size of the education industry was about 117 billion U.S.
View complete answer
Does India pay for education?
India has a publicly funded higher education system that is the third largest in the world, next to the United States and China, The main governing body at the tertiary level is the University Grants Commission, which enforces its standards, advises the government, and helps coordinate between the centre and the state.
- Accreditation for higher learning is overseen by 15 autonomous institutions established by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
- As per the latest 2011 Census, about 8.15% (98.615 million) of Indians are graduates, with Union Territories of Chandigarh and Delhi topping the list with 24.65% and 22.56% of their population being graduates respectively.
Indian higher education system has expanded at a fast pace by adding nearly 20,000 colleges and more than 8 million students in a decade from 2000–01 to 2010–11. As of 2020, India has over 1000 universities, with a break up of 54 central universities, 416 state universities, 125 deemed universities, 361 private universities and 159 Institutes of National Importance which include AIIMS, IIMs, IIITs, IISERs, IITs and NITs among others.
Other institutions include 52,627 colleges as government degree colleges, private colleges, standalone institutes and post-graduate research institutions, functioning under these universities as reported by the MHRD in 2020. Colleges may be Autonomous, i.e. empowered to examine their own degrees, up to PhD level in some cases, or non-autonomous, in which case their examinations are under the supervision of the university to which they are affiliated; in either case, however, degrees are awarded in the name of the university rather than the college.
The emphasis in the tertiary level of education lies on science and technology. Indian educational institutions by 2004 consisted of many technology institutes. Distance learning and open education is also a feature of the Indian higher education system, and is looked after by the Distance Education Council,
Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) is the largest university in the world by number of students, having approximately 3.5 million students across the globe. Some institutions of India, such as the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani (BITS), National Institutes of Technology (NITs), Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISERs), Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs), University of Delhi, University of Calcutta, University of Madras, Jawaharlal Nehru University have been globally acclaimed for their standard of education.
However, Indian universities still lag behind universities such as Harvard, Cambridge, and Oxford, Indian higher education is radical in terms of accessibility, and needs radical reforms in standards, giving value, and pacing. A focus on enforcing both streamlining and holding higher standards of curriculum with the help of international academic publishers for transparency, making the vocational and doctoral education pipeline value-oriented and innovative, personalisation of the sector for students to gain immediate and valid transferable credentials in their own pace (e.g., Massive open online course, digital learning, etc.), empowering students to enter the work-force through exit and re-entry options with necessary building blocks of knowledge that leads to a skill/set of skills from a single or multiple academic fields (with required chains of knowledge), instituting stronger institutional responsibility in services for reprioritizing service delivery and working around the complexities, working with international standardization agencies to ensure students are getting value out of the programs, etc are the basic changes needed for gaining international and national competency.
The rise of interest in IT sector, and engineering education in India has boxed students with crammed knowledge that gives them lesser chance to explore and develop their passions with modern elements of education such as co-operative education, work-based training, etc. Moreover, by the end of the 4 year degree most of what students study in the beginning years becomes irrelevant or becomes subjective to knowledge degradation.
Many foreign countries consider the traditional degree pathway that forces student’s in working age to pause for half a decade to earn a degree in a digitized academic environment is less effective and not suitable for a growth economy. Especially in STEM fields when “micro-certificates” are a required aspect of life long learning in the field to stay relevant; many of these micro-certificates or learning blocks either function as a start of a base of knowledge or add on to an existing base.
View complete answer
What percentage of GDP Pakistan spends on education?
Pakistan Education Spending 1993-2022 General government expenditure on education (current, capital, and transfers) is expressed as a percentage of total general government expenditure on all sectors (including health, education, social services, etc.).
Pakistan education spending for 2019 was 11.59%, a 2.95% decline from 2017. Pakistan education spending for 2017 was 14.54%, a 0.52% decline from 2016. Pakistan education spending for 2016 was 15.06%, a 1.88% increase from 2015. Pakistan education spending for 2015 was 13.19%, a 1.89% increase from 2014.
| Pakistan Education Spending – Historical Data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Year | Education Spending (% of GDP) | Annual Change |
| 2019 | 11.59% | -2.95% |
| 2017 | 14.54% | -0.52% |
| 2016 | 15.06% | 1.88% |
| 2015 | 13.19% | 1.89% |
| 2014 | 11.30% | -0.21% |
| 2013 | 11.51% | 0.47% |
| 2012 | 11.04% | 0.12% |
| 2011 | 10.92% | -0.94% |
| 2010 | 11.86% | -0.22% |
| 2009 | 12.08% | -2.01% |
| 2008 | 14.10% | -1.35% |
| 2007 | 15.45% | 0.16% |
| 2006 | 15.29% | 1.51% |
| 2005 | 13.78% | 2.55% |
| 2004 | 11.23% | 2.74% |
| 2000 | 8.49% | -2.82% |
| 1999 | 11.31% | -0.45% |
| 1997 | 11.75% | 1.68% |
| 1996 | 10.07% | -0.24% |
| 1995 | 10.31% | 0.94% |
| 1994 | 9.38% | 1.57% |
| 1993 | 7.80% | 1.57% |
Pakistan Education Spending 1993-2022
View complete answer
How much of GDP is spent on education?
U.S. and World Education Spending – In the United States, education spending falls short of benchmarks set by international organizations such as UNESCO, of which the U.S. is a member. The nation puts 11.6% of public funding toward education, well below the international standard 15.00%.
- Schools in the United States spend an average of $16,993 per pupil, which is the 7 th -highest amount per pupil (after adjusting to local currency values) among the 37 other developed nations in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- In terms of a percentage of its gross domestic product (GDP), the United States ranks 12 th among OECD members in spending on elementary education.
- The United States does not meet UNESCO’s benchmark of a 15.00% share of total public expenditure on education.
- In terms of early childhood education, the United States is one of six (6) countries that do not report any educational spending.
- Luxembourg spends US$22,700 per pupil, which is more than any of the other OECD nations spend on education.
- African nations spend the highest amount on education in terms of a percentage of GDP.
- At 4.96%, the United States spends a smaller percentage of its GDP on education than other developed nations, which average 5.59% of GDP in educational spending.
| Country | Elementary Schools | Secondary Schools |
|---|---|---|
| Luxembourg | $12,892 | $20,413 |
| Korea | $11,047 | $12,202 |
| France | $7,395 | $11,747 |
| Slovenia | $8,542 | $8,290 |
| Spain | $7,320 | $9,020 |
| Mexico | $2,874 | $3,129 |
| Colombia | $3,178 | $2,817 |
| Indonesia | $1,514 | $1,435 |
Who has the number 1 education system in the world?
Education Rankings by Country 2022
| Country | Rank (2021) | Rank (2020) |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2 |
| Germany | 3 | 4 |
| Canada | 4 | 3 |
Which country has the lowest cost of education?
2. Taiwan: Study in Taiwan – Taiwan, one of the Asian countries, is famous as the cheapest country to study. There are many top-class universities which are offering numerous courses. Most of the courses are taught in English but this country is also known for Mandarin learning.
- The beautiful sights of Taiwan provide a fresh natural environment to everyone living there.
- Further, your stay in Taiwan will help you learn about the people and their determination toward their passion.
- You should be aware of the fact that the fee structure range starts from the US $3,300 to the US $4,050 which varies from graduation to post-graduation programs.
In terms of living standards, Taiwan offers you the best living at a low cost. The living cost in Taiwan is not more than the US $2,900 annually.
View complete answer
What is the US education budget?
Each year federal agencies receive funding from Congress, known as budgetary resources. In FY 2022, the Department of Education (ED) had $637.70 Billion distributed among its 10 sub-components. Agencies spend available budgetary resources by making financial promises called obligations.
View complete answer
Why is China so educated?
The educational system in China is a major vehicle for both inculcating values in and teaching needed skills to its people. Traditional Chinese culture attached great importance to education as a means of enhancing a person’s worth and career. In the early 1950s the Chinese communists worked hard to increase the country’s rate of literacy, an effort that won them considerable support from the population.
By the end of that decade, however, the government could no longer provide jobs adequate to meet the expectations of those who had acquired some formal schooling. Other pressing priorities squeezed educational budgets, and the anti-intellectualism inherent in the more-radical mass campaign periods affected the status and quality of the educational effort.
These conflicting pressures made educational policy a sensitive barometer of larger political trends and priorities. The shift to rapid and pragmatic economic development as the overriding national goal in the late 1970s quickly affected China’s educational system.
- The Chinese educational structure provides for six years of primary school, three years each of lower secondary school and upper secondary school, and four years in the standard university curriculum.
- All urban schools are financed by the state, while rural schools depend more heavily on their own financial resources.
Official policy stresses scholastic achievement, with particular emphasis on the natural sciences. A significant effort is made to enhance vocational training opportunities for students who do not attend a university, The quality of education available in the cities generally has been higher than that in the countryside, although considerable effort has been made to increase enrollment in rural areas at all education levels.
- The traditional trend in Chinese education was toward fewer students and higher scholastic standards, resulting in a steeply hierarchical educational system.
- Greater enrollment at all levels, particularly outside the cities, is gradually reversing that trend.
- Primary-school enrollment is now virtually universal, and nearly all of those students receive some secondary education; about one-third of lower-secondary graduates enroll in upper-secondary schools.
The number of university students is increasing rapidly, though it still constitutes only a small fraction of those receiving primary education, For the overwhelming majority of students, admission to a university since 1977 has been based on competitive nationwide examinations, and attendance at a university is usually paid for by the government.
In return, a university student has had to accept the job provided by the state upon graduation. A growing number of university students are receiving training abroad, especially at the postgraduate level. The system that developed in the 1950s of setting up “key” urban schools that were given the best teachers, equipment, and students was reestablished in the late 1970s.
The inherently elitist values of such a system put enormous pressure on secondary-school administrators to improve the rate at which their graduates passed tests for admission into universities. In addition, dozens of elite private schools have been established since the early 1990s in China’s major cities.
Six universities, all administered directly by the Ministry of Education in Beijing, are the flagships of the Chinese higher educational system. Three are located in Beijing: Peking University (Beijing Daxue), the leading nontechnical institution; Tsinghua (Qinghua) University, which is oriented primarily toward science and engineering; and People’s University of China, the only one of the six founded after 1949.
The three outside Beijing are Nankai University in Tianjin, which is especially strong in the social sciences; Fudan University, a comprehensive institution in Shanghai ; and Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University in Guangzhou (Canton), the principal university of South China.
- In addition, every province has a key provincial university, and there are hundreds of other technical and comprehensive higher educational institutions in locations around the country.
- The University of Hong Kong (founded 1911) is the oldest school in Hong Kong.
- The damage done to China’s human capital by the ravages of the Great Leap Forward and, especially, by the Cultural Revolution was so great that it took years to make up the loss.
After the 1970s, however, China’s educational system increasingly trained individuals in technical skills so that they could fulfill the needs of the advanced, modern sector of the economy. The social sciences and humanities also receive more attention than in earlier years, but the base in those disciplines is relatively weak—many leaders still view them with suspicion—and the resources devoted to them are thin.
View complete answer
What is China’s rank in education?
Big hole in popular view that China beats U.S. in education First thing every morning I eat my breakfast and read the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal spread before me. It is a great newspaper, and not just because it has employed three family members.
I don’t always agree with its opinions, but they are well-written and usually carefully explained. Except for last month, in the May 26 paper, when a Journal editorial discussing U.S. economic competition with China made this statement: “America’s biggest competitive disadvantage is its failing K-12 schools, which are controlled by teachers unions and progressives who want to dumb down math education.” Long ago, I earned a master’s degree in East Asian regional studies and was The Washington Post correspondent in Hong Kong and Beijing.
American K-12 education became my prime journalistic interest when I moved back to the United States in late 1980.U.S. schools need improvement. Journal editorials sometimes have good suggestions for making that happen. But the notion that Chinese children are better taught than American children is hard to square with reality.
I suspect the editorial writer who composed that statement would cite the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) tests of 15-year-olds. That effort by the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is the best-known measure of school quality in different countries.
In 2018, China was No.1 in all three subjects tested, mathematics, science and reading. The United States was 38th in math, just above Belarus and Malta, 19th in science, just above Sweden and Belgium, and 14th in reading, just above the United Kingdom and Japan.
- Our science and reading rankings weren’t bad, given the good reputations of the countries we edged out.
- But it is China’s position at the top that inspires the widespread but mistaken belief that their schools are trouncing ours.
- As pointed out by several experts, such as Rob J.
- Gruiters, university lecturer at the faculty of education at the University of Cambridge, the China ranking is a sham.
The 2018 PISA tests were given to 15-year-olds only in the cities of Beijing and Shanghai and the provinces of Jiangsu and Zhejiang, four of the most urbanized and affluent areas of the country. All 79 nations and political entities participating in PISA are asked to submit results that accurately represent their schools.
- China has not done that, but the people running PISA do little about it.
- Tom Loveless, a former senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and an expert on international school assessments, summed up the situation after the 2018 PISA results were released: “There is not one but two Chinas: one urbanized, mainly on the east coast, and rapidly growing in wealth; the other rural, in the interior of China or on the move as migrants, and mired in poverty.
As a rough proxy, recent population numbers put the Chinese rural share at 41 percent. PISA assesses achievement of the first China and ignores the second.” In his response to me, the OECD official who runs PISA, Andreas Schleicher, dismissed the debate as an exercise in mislabeling.
- He said PISA doesn’t present these as Chinese numbers, even if nearly everyone else does.
- PISA reports make no inference that these results are representative of the whole nation because they clearly are not,” he said.
- A reader might get a different impression.
- The list’s top line says “1.
- China (Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang)” or sometimes just “1.
China (B-S-J-Z)”. Some of the deepest work on Chinese education has come from University of Kansas education professor Yong Zhao, who grew up in Sichuan province in southwest China. Not only are the PISA scores distorted, he said, but they miss the point of good schooling.
Chinese educators “can produce good test scores,” he said, “but they have been struggling to make changes to their education so their students can be more creative and entrepreneurial.” So far only one Nobel Prize has been awarded to a Chinese scientist (Tu Youyou in 2015) for research done in mainland China.
A good example of China’s education problem is the rock star reputation of American teacher Rafe Esquith, whose books and appearances are popular with teachers in the People’s Republic. Esquith’s fifth-graders in a low-income public school in Los Angeles learned hands-on economics, read novels far above their grade level and each year produced a Shakespeare play with their own musical accompaniment.
- That kind of imagination is lacking in Chinese schools, even in places where test scores are high.
- Scholars rarely get a chance to look closely at rural Chinese education, but the available information is depressing.
- Loveless cited studies conducted from 2007 to 2013 showing cumulative dropout rates in rural areas between 17 and 31 percent in junior high schools.
Only half of rural Chinese children went to high school and only 37 percent of that age group graduated. A revealed that in 27 provinces the average high school classroom had more than 45 students. In 12 provinces the average was more than 55. Loveless said the government’s official goal is no more than 56 students per classroom.
China’s educational failings are one of many reasons there are now 2.5 million Chinese immigrants in the United States, seven times the number here in 1980. Many of them are in California’s San Gabriel Valley, where I live. They add much to our country. Note that Chloe Zhao, the latest recipient of the Academy Award for best director, was an unhappy student in China and came here when she was in high school.
We are fortunate to get such people. But I hope China finds ways to improve its schools. Creative competition between China and the United States is a plus for humanity. As for the alleged efforts of unions and progressives to dumb down U.S. math classes, I have spent most of my career studying some of the nation’s most successful educators.
- They tell me it is not unions or leftist influences that get in their way, but unimaginative administrators and limits on class time, problems that predate big teacher unions.
- As for progressive educators like Esquith, many teachers in China want to do what he’s done.
- Perhaps the Journal writer will get more space next time to explain why Chinese schools are better than ours.
I will be checking the ed page as I add milk to my Grape-Nuts. : Big hole in popular view that China beats U.S. in education
View complete answer
How Indian education system was destroyed?
The systematic destruction of the Indian system of education deprived certain castes of education. Thus over a hundred years these castes had become impoverished and ignorant and the Brahmins who were supposed to lead the society became distorted in their understanding of things, due to foreign education.
View complete answer
What percent of the GDP is spent on education?
U.S. and World Education Spending – In the United States, education spending falls short of benchmarks set by international organizations such as UNESCO, of which the U.S. is a member. The nation puts 11.6% of public funding toward education, well below the international standard 15.00%.
- Schools in the United States spend an average of $16,993 per pupil, which is the 7 th -highest amount per pupil (after adjusting to local currency values) among the 37 other developed nations in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- In terms of a percentage of its gross domestic product (GDP), the United States ranks 12 th among OECD members in spending on elementary education.
- The United States does not meet UNESCO’s benchmark of a 15.00% share of total public expenditure on education.
- In terms of early childhood education, the United States is one of six (6) countries that do not report any educational spending.
- Luxembourg spends US$22,700 per pupil, which is more than any of the other OECD nations spend on education.
- African nations spend the highest amount on education in terms of a percentage of GDP.
- At 4.96%, the United States spends a smaller percentage of its GDP on education than other developed nations, which average 5.59% of GDP in educational spending.
| Country | Elementary Schools | Secondary Schools |
|---|---|---|
| Luxembourg | $12,892 | $20,413 |
| Korea | $11,047 | $12,202 |
| France | $7,395 | $11,747 |
| Slovenia | $8,542 | $8,290 |
| Spain | $7,320 | $9,020 |
| Mexico | $2,874 | $3,129 |
| Colombia | $3,178 | $2,817 |
| Indonesia | $1,514 | $1,435 |
How much is the Indian education industry worth?
India School Market Report The India school market size reached US$ 43.5 Billion in 2022. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach US$ 87.3 Billion by 2028, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 12.1% during 2023-2028. India holds an important place in the global education industry with around 1.55 million K-12 schools and a student base of 218 million.
- The Indian school system can be segmented in various categories according to the level of education provided such as preschool, primary, middle, secondary and higher secondary.
- On the basis of ownership, it can be segmented into government, local bodies, private aided or unaided institution and on the basis of affiliation, it can be segmented into having Indian or international board affiliations.
The School education in India has traditionally been characterised by overcrowding of classes and ineffective learning for students. However, as a result of infrastructure growth, increasing private and public investments and technological advancements, the school infrastructure in the country has witnessed significant growth with the mode of teaching also shifting to digital learning and smart class formats.
This has assisted the students in improving their academic performance significantly and made teaching more effective. www.imarcgroup.com Note: Information in the above chart consists of dummy data and is only shown here for representation purpose. Kindly contact us for the actual market size and trends.
To get more information about this market, The primary factor driving the Indian school market is the huge population in the country and a significant shortage of the number of schools to provide quality education. With a constantly growing population of around 1.37 billion, India represents the world’s second largest populated country after China.
This represents a huge consumer base for the education sector. Another factor driving the Indian school market is the significant amount of monetary support received from the government as well as private Institutions. This has resulted in significant upgradation of the education infrastructure across both rural and urban regions.
Additionally, reforms such as New Education Policy (NEP), foundation of Eklavya schools, etc, introduced by the government in order to promote girl education and provide equal opportunities for all has also driven the market positively. Moreover, technological advancements in the methods of teaching such as smart classes, digital libraries, augmented reality, etc, has also made learning more interactive for students, exhibiting immense scope for the Indian school market.
- IMARC Group’s latest report provides a deep insight into the Indian school market covering all its essential aspects.
- This ranges from macro overview of the market to micro details of the industry performance, recent trends, key market drivers and challenges, SWOT analysis, Porter’s five forces analysis, value chain analysis, etc.
This report is a must-read for entrepreneurs, investors, researchers, consultants, business strategists, and all those who have any kind of stake or are planning to foray into the Indian school market in any manner.
View complete answer
What percentage of GDP is spent on healthcare in India 2022?
Indian government was estimated to spend over two percent of the country’s GDP on healthcare in financial year 2022. This was forecasted to reach over 2.5 percent of the GDP by financial year 2025.
View complete answer
What percentage of GDP Pakistan spend on education?
Pakistan Education Spending 1993-2022 General government expenditure on education (current, capital, and transfers) is expressed as a percentage of total general government expenditure on all sectors (including health, education, social services, etc.).
Pakistan education spending for 2019 was 11.59%, a 2.95% decline from 2017. Pakistan education spending for 2017 was 14.54%, a 0.52% decline from 2016. Pakistan education spending for 2016 was 15.06%, a 1.88% increase from 2015. Pakistan education spending for 2015 was 13.19%, a 1.89% increase from 2014.
| Pakistan Education Spending – Historical Data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Year | Education Spending (% of GDP) | Annual Change |
| 2019 | 11.59% | -2.95% |
| 2017 | 14.54% | -0.52% |
| 2016 | 15.06% | 1.88% |
| 2015 | 13.19% | 1.89% |
| 2014 | 11.30% | -0.21% |
| 2013 | 11.51% | 0.47% |
| 2012 | 11.04% | 0.12% |
| 2011 | 10.92% | -0.94% |
| 2010 | 11.86% | -0.22% |
| 2009 | 12.08% | -2.01% |
| 2008 | 14.10% | -1.35% |
| 2007 | 15.45% | 0.16% |
| 2006 | 15.29% | 1.51% |
| 2005 | 13.78% | 2.55% |
| 2004 | 11.23% | 2.74% |
| 2000 | 8.49% | -2.82% |
| 1999 | 11.31% | -0.45% |
| 1997 | 11.75% | 1.68% |
| 1996 | 10.07% | -0.24% |
| 1995 | 10.31% | 0.94% |
| 1994 | 9.38% | 1.57% |
| 1993 | 7.80% | 1.57% |
Pakistan Education Spending 1993-2022
View complete answer
