What Education Do You Need To Be An Animator?
How to Switch Your Career to Animation – A career in animation generally requires a bachelor’s degree in animation or a related field. Additionally, as with most careers in art, demonstrating strong portfolio work is an essential component to securing a job.
- Many colleges oversee online bachelor’s in animation programs,
- These distance options often offer lower tuition rates, flexible scheduling, and scholarships.
- You may also be able to continue working while earning your degree.
- Individuals who already possess an art degree may find the transition into animation easier if they have a preexisting body of work and industry experience.
These individuals can take online courses to strengthen their animation skills and potentially earn certifications.
View complete answer
Contents
- 1 What subjects do you need for animation?
- 2 Do Disney animators need a degree?
- 3 How hard is it to become an animator?
- 4 Do animators use math?
- 5 Are animators paid enough?
- 6 Can you be a millionaire as a animator?
- 7 Is animation a realistic career?
- 8 Do animators draw by hand?
- 9 Is animation high paying?
- 10 Where are animators paid well?
- 11 Does animation require science?
What subjects do you need for animation?
Animation Syllabus
| BSc Animation Syllabus | ||
|---|---|---|
| Computer-Based 2D Animation | Multimedia & Computer Graphics | Introduction to 3D Animation & Modeling |
| Technical English | 3D Animation | Production Process |
| Composing and Editing | Colour Theory | Layout and Perspective |
| Script Writing | Content Development Direction | Gaming Technology |
Do animators need to go to art school?
What Are the Educational Requirements for Animators? – Animators are certainly not required to have a college degree, but it is strongly advised if you want a good-paying job in the field. This is because most employers want to work with candidates who have some formal education in the industry.
View complete answer
Do Disney animators need a degree?
You need a bachelor’s degree to be a Disney animator. Walt Disney Animators Studios (WDAS) looks for animators with a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Animation or related field or equivalent work experience. It is also important to have at least 2 years computer animation experience with Maya or a similar program.
Walt Disney established the California Institute of the Arts (CalArts) in Valencia in 1961. It grants Bachelor of Fine Arts, the Master of Fine Arts and a Doctor of Musical Arts degrees. CalArts’ school and degree programs include the School of Art, the School of Film/Video and the School of Theater, among others.
There are many art school programs, while not affiliated with Disney, that have fundamental art preparation that is necessary for Disney animators. The undergraduate program at the School of Visual Arts in New York offers, for example, 29 fields including animation, cartooning and film and video. 
View complete answer
How hard is it to become an animator?
Practice, practice, practice – In order to become a successful animator, it really comes down to practice. As mentioned before, animation isn’t something learned overnight. It’s arguably one of the most difficult aspects within a 3D pipeline, It’ll take lots of trial and error and most likely some frustration.
View complete answer
Do animators use math?
Math Is Useful To Make Stunning Computer Graphics Simple – Computer graphics requires algorithms and data structures to simulate physical reality, including light, fluids, and collisions. So, how do animators use math in CGI? Animators use math to understand mass, density, and friction to make objects move believably. Image by The Science Behind Pixar Imagine a string puppet with 700 strings; now imagine all those 700 controls working simultaneously to give life to an animation; that’s what animators deal with while developing animation features, Math in animation is necessary to calculate viewpoints, aspect ratios, character movement, artificial lighting, and color balance,
- Furthermore, animators use math to calculate movement and frame rates in animation.
- Frame rates are how many frames per second the animators need to make the character move fluidly with the script.
- Looking at a single frame of the animation movie “Inside Out,” here’s the answer to “how do animators use math in computer graphics?” Rendering Think of a camera pointing at a 3D frame, and the camera “renders” what it sees into a 2D image.
Someone in the animation team needs to compute all the light arriving at the camera lens from the scene, and this is one of the ways lighting artists use math in animation, The below integral describes the rendering equation, which is a recursive definition of how light moving away in a particular direction from a point is equivalent to how much light it emits in that same direction plus the subtended fraction of how much light it reflects from every other spot. Kajiya Rendering Equation via StackExchange Since there are infinite points and infinite recursion in the universe, animators approximate the rendering equation using statistical techniques, Light has polarization and is not a scalar quantity, so the artist uses math to decide on what basis to represent light.
The task also requires computer science and engineering optimizations, All of which reflect how animators use advanced math in CGI. Although CGI tools do the heavy lifting, it is no cruise through for animators to create seamless transitions, add realistic effects, customize characters with special styling tools, or create advanced engineering projects.
Computer graphics is a powerful way to learn statistics concepts like MCMC methods, importance sampling, statistical mechanics, and the bias-variance tradeoff. Simulation Big animation studios like Pixar invest significantly in math because creating animations that reflect real life requires significant accuracy in depicting an animation frame. Image by Juliano via Pinterest In the top picture, the characters are playing atop molten lava. They are wearing clothing of different “fabrics,” and their hair deforms in motion as they move. The cloth fabrics behave like dampened spring systems where each fabric thread is a spring, simulated to behave as they would in real life when the characters move in the animation.
Their hair is also a system of springs that absorb kinetic energy from their head movements and the influence of the wind, Lava is complex to animate because of its fluid advection behavior and texture, so it is simpler to simulate it rather than have an artist animate it. Reflecting on animation design according to physical reality and the simulation of physical reality to animation shows how animators use math in their careers.
Scene Representation The use of linear algebra is ubiquitous in scene geometry. Transformations are constant in animation, and linear algebra is fundamental for the purpose, whether by modelers adjusting vertices on a character’s face mesh or a set dresser rearranging items.
Rotations, transformations, and scalings are simple, but linear algebra involves inverse kinematics problems,e.g., animation, and numerical solvers for simulation, i.e., finding numerical solutions to large equation systems, spring mechanics, or preserving volumes when characters move. Shading In simulating reality, shading portrays how each patch of geometry in the scene reacts to incoming light and goes hand-in-hand with rendering.
Some animators use math modules including machine learning, linear regression, and other parametric models to approximate diverse surfaces. A flat surface is noticeably distinct from a bumpy surface depending on how it reflects light, and shading compensates for this heterogenous geometry, Image by Thomas J. Fellers via Olympus Computer graphics facilitate many facets of maths not seen in other places. For instance, with enough data, machine learning methods can do regression on the light field equation, i.e., “guess” what the light integral turns out to be without path tracing,
View complete answer
Is being an animator a good job?
A career as an animator can be a rewarding way to express yourself artistically, work in a field you’re passionate about and contribute to exciting projects. Learning more about the role of an animator can help you decide if the job is the right choice for you and your career goals.
View complete answer
Do animators have to draw well?
Unless you specifically choose to do hand-drawn animation, no drawing skill is necessary to become a good animator. Additionally, when hand-drawn animation if the field of choice, there is always a limit to how much drawing skill is necessary. Usually, relatively little drawing skill is needed for 2D animation (see Cartoon Network ). The world’s most talented drawers can be found illustrating children’s books or comic books or making conceptional art for sci-fi movies. I know you were kidding around, but I think the truth at the center of the joke is that drawing is a sliding scale, and the scale is always changing. Whatever our level of skill, we always know of someone who could kick our butts artistically. Most artists spend little time considering how much they’ve improved over time, and instead focus on their own shortcomings. LOL! Everyone hates those people – especially if they’re younger than we are. 😀 Hi DSB, Ha ha! Being an old hack myself, I hate those people too! You said it perfectly here about drawing being a sliding scale. Compare to the best guys, I can’t draw but I have an edge over my 3years old son. Walk in to any 2d studio- big or small, you will find that the best draftman is not usually an animator; the best animator might not draw better than the other animators and your assistants always draw better than you! If we don’t pay enough attention to polish our animation skills as well as our drawing skills. we might find ourselves flipping burgers instead of flipping drawings when the industry goes through changes (it happens!). -Paul Drawing to help us consider and understand what we see Maybe I’m missing the point here – or maybe it’s a question of interpretation. Might it not help to think less about the accomplishment of somebody’s drawings (in terms of technical, “classical” or academic prowess) – and think more about what any one of us achieves by the effort of drawing from observation in the first place (as opposed to doodling or sketching from the imagination or from the personal memory bank)? Animation – if it’s to trigger a sympathetic response of any kind in an audience – surely ought to share with live action film (and with good prose or songwriting) all the best qualities of observation. By drawing even the simplest quick sketch of a person, an object or a landscape, regardless of the detail or the “finish”, we’re setting on paper something that begs to be recognised, something that invites a response. If you look at James Thurber’s cartoons you’re going to see a highly personal yet wholly recognisable view of the world, as seen through the artist’s own myopic, eccentric filter. OK – he may be no Albrecht Durer in terms of draftsmanship – but “horses for courses”. Again and again I hear people in the CGI context (particularly in colleges where too often there simply ARE no drawing classes or even any experienced drawing teachers) nervously asking if drawing “matters” – the desired “get out of jail free” response being “No siree – go straight to the bank, collect $200, don’t even stop to think, look or commit any ideas to paper.”. Drawing’s part of the process of planning too – and anybody who’s ever tried to construct and move ANYthing, real or virtual, without thinking ahead, can tell you the value of planning. Top of the pile, though, has to be the question of each person finding and “sounding” their own individual voice through drawing. After all – in storytelling of any kind – we get to the universal via the personal, don’t we? There’s far too much argument and concern about technical ability when drawing’s discussed – the important thing here is for people to LOOK at what surrounds them in the part of the world they themselves inhabit (not the world as they find it in tiny, far-away pieces on Google), to think about what they see with their own eyes and to apply all of that to what they’re trying to realise, whether it’s believability in a bit of performance animation or mood/atmosphere in a layout or background painting. Or am I indeed missing the original point here.? FM Maybe I’m missing the point here – or maybe it’s a question of interpretation. Might it not help to think less about the accomplishment of somebody’s drawings (in terms of technical, “classical” or academic prowess) – and think more about what any one of us achieves by the effort of drawing from observation in the first place (as opposed to doodling or sketching from the imagination or from the personal memory bank)? Animation – if it’s to trigger a sympathetic response of any kind in an audience – surely ought to share with live action film (and with good prose or songwriting) all the best qualities of observation. By drawing even the simplest quick sketch of a person, an object or a landscape, regardless of the detail or the “finish”, we’re setting on paper something that begs to be recognised, something that invites a response. If you look at James Thurber’s cartoons you’re going to see a highly personal yet wholly recognisable view of the world, as seen through the artist’s own myopic, eccentric filter. OK – he may be no Albrecht Durer in terms of draftsmanship – but “horses for courses”. Again and again I hear people in the CGI context (particularly in colleges where too often there simply ARE no drawing classes or even any experienced drawing teachers) nervously asking if drawing “matters” – the desired “get out of jail free” response being “No siree – go straight to the bank, collect $200, don’t even stop to think, look or commit any ideas to paper.”. Drawing’s part of the process of planning too – and anybody who’s ever tried to construct and move ANYthing, real or virtual, without thinking ahead, can tell you the value of planning. Top of the pile, though, has to be the question of each person finding and “sounding” their own individual voice through drawing. After all – in storytelling of any kind – we get to the universal via the personal, don’t we? There’s far too much argument and concern about technical ability when drawing’s discussed – the important thing here is for people to LOOK at what surrounds them in the part of the world they themselves inhabit (not the world as they find it in tiny, far-away pieces on Google), to think about what they see with their own eyes and to apply all of that to what they’re trying to realise, whether it’s believability in a bit of performance animation or mood/atmosphere in a layout or background painting. Or am I indeed missing the original point here.? FM No Fraser-I think you are getting the point clearly. My take is much the same: that a lot of newcomers want a shortcut past the intimidating skill of drawing. Even those pros that chimed in with the arguement that drawing isn;t needed have overlooked their own backgrounds-in several cases some have multi-year experience in 2D animation PRIOR to taking on 3D. That kinda slant the debate back in favour of drawing. I look at it in this way: if someone doesn’t want to add drawing skills to their repetoire then more power to them. I strongly feel they are denying themselves an asset skill that will serve their career, but hey, its THEIR career. The crux of my own arguement in this debate is just that: why pursue a career with only half-assed abilities? The biz, overall, has a certain level of artistic competence that it asks for-I’ve long felt it a reasonable thing to demand that of people, and have wondered equally as long why so many aspirants balk ( or are intimidated) at those demands. Lacking a well-rounded skill-set means the options in one’s career become limited, and this in a idustry that can be notoriously ruthless in pigeon-holing people. I was a inbetweener for over 6 years, simply because that was all, was seen to be able to do, that is all I was in the eyes of many around me. I was lucky to be able to branch out into storyboarding and teaching, but not everyone get’s such breaks-more than a few abandon the biz after only a few years. In the two decades I’ve been doing this professionally, I understand the nature of the biz well enough to know that specialization can cripple you. I was encouraged by many mentors ( and personally continue to encourage myself) to cling to the idea of gaining as broad a skill-set as one can. The clincher to that is that its NOT easy-which is why not a lot of people can (or are willing to) do so. Hey, that’s fine, by me, because really all that competition can be a pain. :rolleyes: — “We all grow older, we do not have to grow up”-Archie Goodwin ( 1937-1998) No Fraser-I think you are getting the point clearly. My take is much the same: that a lot of newcomers want a shortcut past the intimidating skill of drawing. Even those pros that chimed in with the arguement that drawing isn;t needed have overlooked their own backgrounds-in several cases some have multi-year experience in 2D animation PRIOR to taking on 3D. That kinda slant the debate back in favour of drawing. Hi Ken, I know! Admitting to be a 2d guy did not help my argument at all. I just thought maybe others could see that I wasn’t just trying to protect my own kind! The other three animators were bad examples too! Melanie, Jason and Kevan all draw very well and tried desperately to pretend that they couldn’t. Unfortunately people knew them and quickly pointed that out. I have to find other victims to help my case!:) The thread went off topic and became heated partly due to my aggressiveness. I must apologize for that. It’s good to see you and Fraser turn this back to a friendly debate. -Paul Chung I’d go for a straight out YES, drawing is important in animation. To deter anyone from failing to try it out. But is it possible to succeed without drawing skills? Yes, there are exceptions for a select few. Is excellent drawing required for animation? No. Drawing is a form of planning, and I think planning is undisputed to be essential in animation. So a potential animators should not focus on drawing itself, but drawing for animation. Basic perspective, force, weight, breaking joints, line of action. That is the way majority of animators plan their shots, so it should be worth giving it a go to develop your sketching skills. No one should just discard drawing as unimportant just because some people can animate without it. When you have gone the extra mile and have discovered that you can in fact plan better with other ways than drawing, by all means.whatever works for you. I have a feeling that with some practice and exploration, most will turn to drawing as a quick way to get your thoughts out visually. But definitely if you are trying to find a short cut, DON’T. Take up drawing first and see if it helps. But I think drawing is not an absolute criteria for 3D animators, but an asset. Now if you wanted a job as a 2D animator, or an illustrator.different story. My 2 cents How can you “design” if you don’t draw? Quote: (from Harvey Human) “A 3D animator can build his observational skills simply by observing: by watching carefully how things move. Drawing might not be the best tool for studying and recording movement. Taking video might be better. You’d lose less in translation with video than with a sequence of drawings.”, “There is all sorts of visualization work which requires design skill, mathematical skill, and sculptural skill, but little or no drawing skill.” Hey there, Paul – glad to be thought of as contributing something “friendly”! Are you the same Paul Chung, by the way, who used to work at Uli’s in London? Just curious. Anyway – I’m completely mystified by the above quotes from Harvey. Am I wrong in thinking that the English word “design” comes from the French word “dessin” which, in turn, MEANS to draw? Even if I’m wrong on the origins of the word – I’d love to know how one can “design” anything without making marks (in any medium, be it on paper or on a tablet/screen) and how, in turn, one can make marks without drawing – unless those marks are purely abstract or verbal. As for the idea of video footage of pigeons achieveing the same thing as drawing them, I think Harvey’s argument is leading us back to the whole notion of Muybridge and the persistence of vision. Yes – the human eye sends information to the brain that we cannot interpret instantaneously. But no – cameras themselves don’t interpret or understand – period. And that, for what it’s worth, would be my own point again about drawing as a part of the obesrvation process. Merely capturing a movement is not the same as understanding it. And to animate something well, one has to take the time to arrive at a clear understanding of what one is trying to capture AND communicate. Photography certainly has nothing interpretaive about it – think about all those speed cameras on the UK roads. Any device, machine or preson that comes between the individual’s own first-hand personal visual experience of an object (or event) and the individual’s brain is something which creates both distance and the possibility of confusion or bias. If that were not the case then no editorial power would exist in the hands of news teams covering events with cameras. Animators would be nuts not to make use of any tools, mechanical or otherwise, which can help them to study creatures or people or natural events which happen too quickly to be seen and “understood” in one go. But that in itself is no argument against drawing either. I’d go so far as to say it’s simply an extension of the draftsman’s toolkit (not a wholesale replacement for pencils, pens and brushes). Harping on about the use of cameras (in PLACE of drawing) is simply an argument in favour of impatience in my book. And anybody who’s spent any time in animation (in any medium) will, I reckon, appreciate the meaning and importance of the old saying, “more haste, less speed”. And – as Richard Williams repeats again and again in his book – if you don’t like boring, repetitive, hard work, what are you doing in animation in the first place? (sorry for the paraphrasing) If – in sport – one were to argue that moto-cross bikes are faster than running on foot, one would be “right” in straightforward objective terms – but would that necessarily mean that riding a motorbike was “better” than (or somehow the same as) walking or running? To sum up my own feelings about photography versus observational drawing – I recently had to do a presentation for some games design students, loking at performance animation. I ran two separate sequences without sound – one from “Waking Life” (where the college professor and the young guy are walking along the street while the professor talks), the other from “The Incredibles” (where Bob and Helen Parr are arguing late at night after he comes home from saving people from a burning building. My point is/was – in the latter you can tell from the pantomime, the distillation and exagerration of the characters’ movements, EXACTLY what their feelings are. In the former – even though it’s derived from a rotoscoping technique rather than from observational or interpretive drawing – all you can tell is that one character’s mouth is moving and the other’s isn’t. Simply using a camera to capture movement isn’t enough to let you begin seeing and understanding something as you intend to adapt and manipulate it when you proceed to use it as an element in any kind of truly communcative animation. Cameras CAN be useful. Animators would be crazy not to use them (and just as crazy to ignore what’s available on Google). That’s not the point. As for the idea of “design” being a job you can do without drawing – that one REALLY loses me.! I’d be fascinated to know what on earth “design” can be (particularly as a paid job of any kind in the movie production process) if it involves absolutely no drawing of any kind, FM ” is usually a disparaging remark. If the concern is to save time, something can be acted out and verbally explained much quicker than it can be drawn. I’m guessing (and will be corrected by more experienced 3D animators if I’m wrong) that the very best 3D animators don’t need to draw at all. They can clearly visualize it in their noggins. It depends on how stupid the animator is. “Do I need to draw you a picture ” is usually a disparaging remark. If the concern is to save time, something can be acted out and verbally explained much quicker than it can be drawn. I’m guessing (and will be corrected by more experienced 3D animators if I’m wrong) that the very best 3D animators don’t need to draw at all. They can clearly visualize it in their noggins. I thought a picture was worth a thousand words? That’s an interesting thought, Harvey. It might be similar to some of the older 2D animators weaning themselves off of reference as they found their sensibilities for mechanics developed well enough. As a student I still see planning helping my work, same for most of my teachers (including a 2D/3D hybrid with 20 years and a 3D/stop-motion ) with over 10 years. I’m willing to bet it’s half weaning, half “different strokes.” I should note that I’m not switching “drawing” to “planning” but in my case (and in the case of both of their 3D and the latter’s stop-mo) drawing was a huge part of planning. For me, visualization as a 3D animator is a separate process. I’ll see it in my head, and build things like thumbs, reference, etc. as needed from that. Then when I refer to those things to animate, I refer back to the initial visualization to see if it’s on the money or is suffering from “telephone * ” translation. * The game. Scattered how can you build in your head if you don’t know the basics. What makes the best football coach, one that has played the game physically and knows the nuances or one that has only studied the books and plays? Scattered how can you build in your head if you don’t know the basics. What makes the best football coach, one that has played the game physically and knows the nuances or one that has only studied the books and plays? Because I wasn’t speaking in sweeping generalization. In the context of what I am talking about, you do know at least fundamentally what you’re dealing with and the rest doesn’t depend on knowing anything because you’re taking things that are more, for lack of a better word, intrinsic and giving them form. Drawing helps with all aspects Hello. My experience is that drawing helps with all the aspects of animation from boarding to posing. The more one understands art and drawing- especially observational drawing – the further one can push poses into extreme poses and also that easier it is to understand nuances in acting, and staging (composition within the frame). I don’t expect that many folks who don’t draw will understand this- it’s like asking an unsighted person to understand images they can’t see. Yes- you may be able to animate (kind of) – but think of what you could do with those extra drawing skills. I just had lunch with two top notch 3D animators who are from Disney and R & H – and they said as much – their improved drawing really helped their animation. Thanks. >> the content would be something easily imagined All the more reason for a specific drawing, otherwise you’re just asking for “that’s not what I had in mind” not to mention “That’s not what I signed off on”. That’s the whole reason for Pre-Vis and for Concept Art in the first place, no? So that everyone is on the same page, there’s continuity to the story. How much lattitude are animators given to make changes? What’s the difference between adding a special something to bring it to life and what’s a deviation from the storyboard? What’s a big change and how are they made in the pipeline? Is it just a discussion or does it need to be signed in triplicate? I’ve heard the term “notes” used, Notes from the producer, notes from the network. Are notes just typed up recommendations or are there sketches (where applicable). I personally love to draw, however, Animation – if it’s to trigger a sympathetic response of any kind in an audience – surely ought to share with live action film (and with good prose or songwriting) all the best qualities of observation. By drawing even the simplest quick sketch of a person, an object or a landscape, regardless of the detail or the “finish”, we’re setting on paper something that begs to be recognised, something that invites a response. Drawing’s part of the process of planning too – and anybody who’s ever tried to construct and move ANYthing, real or virtual, without thinking ahead, can tell you the value of planning. Top of the pile, though, has to be the question of each person finding and “sounding” their own individual voice through drawing. After all – in storytelling of any kind – we get to the universal via the personal, don’t we? A 3D animator can build his observational skills simply by observing: by watching carefully how things move. Drawing might not be the best tool for studying and recording movement. Taking video might be better. You’d lose less in translation with video than with a sequence of drawings. If a 3D animator (CG or stop-motion) has an assignment where he has to animate a pigeon, he might want to take a video camera to the park instead of a sketch pad. Doing drawings of the pigeons probably won’t help much, unless he is also designing the pigeon character. Lacking a well-rounded skill-set means the options in one’s career become limited, and this in a idustry that can be notoriously ruthless in pigeon-holing people. In the two decades I’ve been doing this professionally, I understand the nature of the biz well enough to know that specialization can cripple you. Naturally if one has more skills, there is a wider variety of jobs he’ll be qualified for when the animation work dries up; but one of those skills doesn’t necessarily have to be drawing. There are design, programming, video production,, Within 3D itself, there is not only animating, but also modeling, rigging, and rendering. There is all sorts of visualization work which requires design skill, mathematical skill, and sculptural skill, but little or no drawing skill. Jeane Claude Van Damme once said he wouldn’t have become the action star he was during the 80s and 90s if he hadn’t taken ballet lessons in addition to his martial arts training. One benefits from the other and can greatly change the other’s style. Maybe that’s why his butt cheeks are so tight. I hear ballet is a wonderful toning tool. I don’t get it. How can you be an animator and want to avoid drawing? Originally Posted by digger I don’t get it. How can you be an animator and want to avoid drawing? It really depends on the type of animation really. It’s more a question of choice as to whether or not the individual wants to be able to draw, but it is not necessary to draw if you’re going to animate cut-out pieces of paper or moving clay characters. Personally I love drawing. oops.I was replying to page1. Didn’t see it went on to page 16. However still a think good drawing skills a necessity. What we look for is people who think 3 dimensionally and show this through their drawing. Unfortunately this is rather rare. Good observation and exploring space 3 dimensionally is the key. Ya but itz not that important.rite? I mean i can draw but itz shit on paper.It helps rite but not a must need for digital animation rite? Na itz.rong! (How can someone spell “important” and “animation” correctly, but they can’t spell “right”? Oh well.) Let me put it this way: If I had to hire a 3D animator and – all other things being equal – one could draw and one couldn’t, I would hire the one who could. What are you going to do when you have a pose idea and the director commands, “Do a sketch of what you mean”? If you can’t sketch, and it comes time for cutbacks, you’re the first one on my chopping block. This isn’t to say that you need to be able to draw like Leonardo, but you should definitely be able to sketch a lucid drawing of the character you’re animating within a few seconds. If you’re going to morph your character’s face into a certain expression, you should be able to do a storyboard-quality doodle of that same expression on paper. http://iat.ubalt.edu/courses/old/idia750.085_F02/shrekExamples.shtml Kkk Juz for yr info,i write short(due to too much chatting)thts y i write wrong.Sooo kk drawing IS important.Now all i need is contacts. Imagination is much more important then knowledge. Now all i need is contacts. Amen. My aunt got Lasik when it first got widespread in the area she lived in and she’s already having problems from it, not 10 years later. 😀 My overly simple answer to the question would be because it teaches you to see what is important. If only. If only i would care less about my future,i wouldnt be so busy.but wat the heck.so now all i need is a story and a program that works.rite. Imagination is much more important then knowledge.1 more thing 1 more thing. do i need to learn c++ prgramming or any programming to be good in digital animation.cause ive been reading a book on it.Does it really help?? Imagination is much more important then knowledge. Maybe if you cut back on your chatting, you would have more free time to learn to draw. I have a life. Maybe if you cut back on your chatting, you would have more free time to learn to draw. Im only 16.i also have a life u know. @$$ Imagination is much more important then knowledge. Programming vs. Scripting Maya (3D), AfterEffects (2D raster), Flash (2D vector) – 3 industry standard programs – allow for scripting – stringing together commands for better, faster production. I don’t know anything about C++ so I can’t really compare them, but knowing and understanding some of the math behind all the modeling and animation will be extremely helpful. Just like drawing, you don’t need to be a master, but you need to know SOMETHING. Contacts are extremely important. They dry my eyes out and I’m back to wearing glasses,but seriously, the people you meet and talk to WILL be the ones you’ll be working with. You have a great advantage starting out so young and everyone I know appreciates hard working, interested kids. If you come off as only interested in money you’ve just lost a contact especially in this field. What you really need is to start work and build a portfolio/reel. That will lead to contacts which will lead to jobs. I’m sorry. I’m sorry,what do you mean by portfolio/reel??Does it mean i have good grades or be good at things which are important for Digital Animation. Imagination is much more important then knowledge. C++ is a good thing to know, but probably something you won’t use much as an animator. And the syntax is constantly changing so if it’s something you want to master, go for it. But be aware that you will have to keep it up. But if animation and graphics is your focus there are other things more important. And mastering graphic programs is time consuming enough. If you have limited time at your disposal and you are serious about learning animation. Spend that time learning to draw. Jobs are won and lost on the basis of portfolios and reels. In the visual arts the employer wants to see what you can do. Check out the show and tell section and look at some of the reels that are presented there. Take a look at the Daily Sketch section and look at the competition you are facing. Take some time and read some of the older posts here, you’ll gain an education. There are some posts on how to prepare a reel, what employers are looking for in candidates. Take some time and learn about the field you wish to enter. If it something you really want to do you can always wait/bus tables while you build your skills. Short Hand??? K phacker,can u rely on the short hand part in the other 1 (the game production or movie production)cause im stilll dont understand wht u r saying? Imagination is much more important then knowledge. In “short” drop the chat abreviations. They irritate a lot of us here. Write like a normal human being. Harvey has already commented on it and you don’t want to get on Harvey’s bad side! Ok. Sorry,but i’m used to it.but i can’t assure you that i’ll write all nice cause i’m still used to the chatting way of typing. Imagination is much more important then knowledge. Be prepared to get razzed or ignored here, if you fall back into it. And in most professional positions it’s frowned on. Haha.Ok i’ll try my best. Haha.Ok i’ll try my best.I’ll try to speak normally.But i got one thing to say,I don’t live in america but in malaysia.will that have any effect if i wanna work in america.?? Imagination is much more important then knowledge. Probably you’ll have to get a work visa, which means an employer is willing to open a slot for you. Which means you need to develop a great reel that will sell your skills. But from what I understand there is an animation industry developing in Malaysia. You could look for work where you live. Please, go into your cp and add your location and a little more information about yourself. This helps the rest of us answer questions.
View complete answer
Is it worth it to study animation?
Is Animation a Good Major? – A degree in animation will open doors to many job opportunities for students and in a variety of industries. Those who have a passion for art and creativity will find that animation is a good major for them to consider. The intersection of art in traditional animation and technology in modern animation gives another layer to the degree and increases the demand for animators.
View complete answer
Are animators paid enough?
How Much Can Animators Earn Depending On The Field They Choose In The United States – The United States encompasses animators from different industries. As discussed at the article’s start, animators opt and work in various fields. Here we have shared the remuneration of animators from some industries in the United States.
| Animator | Rate Per Hour | Annual Average Salary |
|---|---|---|
| 2D | $30.09 | $60,000 |
| 3D | $37.12 | $77,000 |
The Earning Potentials For Manga Animators In The US Japanese comic books and graphic novels are called manga. They encompass pictures that convey a message by addressing both adults and children. A manga artist may make from $12,521 to $339,998. So if you know how to draw manga characters, you can earn a median salary of $61,039. 
It will be highly beneficial to your career if you know how to draw manga characters. This is because manga animators are in high demand throughout the United States. You can build a progressive career path through manga animation and reach phenomenal heights (Source: Pixabay) The Earning Potentials For Character Animators In The US The role of a character animator is to bring animated characters to life.
- Often referred to as ‘actors with a pencil,’ character animators invest substantive effort into making these animations.
- Although it requires extensive hard work and effort to create character animations, they pay you well.
- So being a character animator, you can earn up to $81,630 in the United States.
The Earning Potentials For Motion Graphics Animators In The US A motion graphics animator has to create engaging artwork for the web, films, or television. They use creative, cinematic, visual effects, and other animation techniques to bring life to their creations.
This is one of the most popular animator roles in the United States, providing reasonable remuneration. You can get a pay of up to $50,313 in the United States. The Earning Potentials For Visual Effects Animators In The US A visual effects animator adds special effects in a clip or film that cannot be added during live shooting.
It would not be hard for you to create compelling visual effects as an animator if you know how to draw exceptionally. As a visual effect animator, you can earn up to $37.36 per hour, which means that you can make an average annual income of $77,700. The Earning Potentials For Freelance Animators In The US The idea of freelance refers to self-employing yourself.
Freelancers can work for different companies on their projects and assignments. They are directly linked with their clients and customers, unlike contracted employees. In addition, there is no middle man, thereby staving off the worry of earning less. Freelancing animation is an excellent and constructive move for animators as it helps build a stable and progressive career path for them.
Numerous animators are making their careers through freelancing in the United States. By sitting in the comfort and convenience of their homes, they can provide top-tier animation services worldwide. Therefore, freelance animators can earn up to $50-$120 per hour.
View complete answer
How many years does it take to become an animator?
To work as an animator, you usually require a bachelor’s degree or a diploma in graphic arts, visual arts, animation or another related field. This degree takes up to four years to complete. Some animators choose to further their studies and specialise in a certain field, which may take an additional year.
View complete answer
Do you need a 4 year degree to be an animator?
A career in animation generally requires a bachelor’s degree in animation or a related field. Additionally, as with most careers in art, demonstrating strong portfolio work is an essential component to securing a job. Many colleges oversee online bachelor’s in animation programs.
View complete answer
What school do most animators go to?
What are the top animation schools in the U.S.?
| Ranking | School | State |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | California Institute of the Arts | California |
| 2 | Savannah College of Art and Design | Georgia |
| 3 | Ringling College of Art and Design | Florida |
| 4 | School of Visual Arts | New York |
Is animation a stressful job?
High-pressure work environment The work environment for multimedia artists and animators can be stressful. They might work under tight deadlines and significant pressure to get their designs completed as quickly as possible.
View complete answer
Can you be a millionaire as a animator?
What is the highest paying animation job? – Consulting fees now top $100 per hour for many consultants, who earn more than $200,000. In terms of salaries, visual development artists, character technical directors, 3D modelers, animation art directors, and forensic animators rank among the top five. So can an animator be rich, yes sir!
View complete answer
Can animators make 6 figures?
Answering the big question: How much do animators get paid? – BLS data lists the 2017 median pay for animators at $70,530 a year, Glassdoor has the national average a bit higher at $74,000, Like many other fields, compensation for animators also depends on experience: it’s not uncommon for senior-level animators or art directors to earn well into six figures.
View complete answer
Is animation a realistic career?
Is a Degree in Animation Worth It? – 
Yes, an animation degree is worth it for many students. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is projecting 4% job growth for artists and animators over the next 10 years. Common animation careers include art director, animation artist, craft or fine artist, graphic designer, and web developer.
View complete answer
Do animators draw by hand?
The Jungle Book © DISNEY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Traditional animation, also known as cel animation, or hand-drawn animation, is an animation technique where each frame of the film is drawn by hand, and was – until the arrival of computer animation – the dominant form used in cinema.
- Although advances in technology have resulted in much of the labour of hand-drawn animation being reduced, the technique remains a long and painstaking one.
- The process begins with producing a series of storyboards to map out what the film will look like.
- These are then synced with the film’s pre-recorded soundtrack to ensure that the animators know precisely when a character is speaking, or bursting into song.
Character designers then work on creating model sheets, to ensure there is consistency in terms of appearance and movement across the board, with many different animators involved. Once all this is completed, the animation itself begins! Animators draw sequences of animation on transparent pieces of paper, one frame at a time, each frame having to match the soundtrack exactly to avoid discrepancy (for example a character’s mouth moving when not speaking).
- Meanwhile background artists are busy painting the sets over which each animated sequence will take place, often using watercolours or oil paints.
- The next big step, after the images have been cleaned and polished, is making them into a film! Each drawing is transferred from paper to a thin, clear sheet of plastic called a cel (short for celluloid).
Once a sequence has been loaded onto cels, the photography process begins using special animated cameras. Once every sequence has been photographed, the final film is sent for development and processing. The rise of computer animation has resulted in fewer traditional animated films being produced, yet they remain hugely popular; painstaking labours of love and arguably more romantic than their more modern counterpart. Available to stream on Into Film + Cert Age group 5–11 Duration 70 mins
View complete answer
Do animators need coding?
Get a head start in film and game animation – Unity brings real-time workflows to animation content creators. Learn how you can harness the power of real-time rendering to help speed up animation workflows. Get in touch to access our suite of 3D animation products.
- What is the difference between 3D animation and CGI? 3D animation is the process of creating three-dimensional models frame by frame,
- This is done by creating a model or character, rigging it with bones and joints, and then animating it to create the desired movement.
- CGI is the process of creating images or scenes using computer graphics.
This can be done by either generating the images from scratch or by manipulating existing images and can be used to create anything from simple 2D images to complex 3D environments. The key difference between CGI and 3D animation is that CGI uses three-dimensional objects to create the illusion of movement while 3D animation involves the construction of three-dimensional models frame by frame.3D animation and CGI both have their pros and cons, so it really depends on what you’re looking for in a visual effects solution.
- If you want to create static images, then CGI is a good choice.
- If you want to create the illusion of movement, then 3D animation is a better choice.
- Does 3D animation require coding or drawing? 3D animation does not require drawing or coding, but it does require a significant amount of skill and training.3D animators use computer software to create the illusion of movement.
This involves creating three-dimensional models of objects and characters and then manipulating them to create the desired effect. To do this, animators must have a strong understanding of the principles of movement and how to use the software to create realistic animations.
What industries is 3D animation used in? 3D animation is used in a variety of industries, including film, television, video games, and advertising. Its versatility makes it a popular choice for animators and directors across different mediums. While its use in feature films and television has been well-documented, 3D animation is also increasingly being used in video games and advertising.
Its popularity in these industries is due to its ability to create realistic images and environments that are not possible with traditional 2D animation.
View complete answer
Is animation high paying?
Highest-paying Animation Jobs | Academia Animation is one of the most amazing as well as exciting career fields. is a career field which falls in the art and design industry. The animation industry has been growing rapidly, and there is a huge scope in animation.
Every company, be it a fashion brand, advertising agency or multinational company are always on the lookout for talented as well as skilled animators. Animations also offer one of the highest salaries in the industry. Individuals in this field can find work in a variety of industries. A career in animation is quite rewarding and interesting.
If you are interested in pursuing animation and looking for the highest-paying animation jobs, then you have certainly landed on the right page. We are here to help you. Yes! In this article, you will discover everything about the highest-paying animation jobs.
View complete answer
Where are animators paid well?
How much does an Animation Artist make? – The average salary for an animation artist in the United States is $80,929, Animation artist salaries typically range between $52,000 and $125,000 a year. The average hourly rate for animation artists is $38.91 per hour.
The average salary for an animation artist is $80,929 in the US. The average animation artist salary ranges between $52,000 and $125,000 in the US. Hourly rates for animation artists in the US typically range between $25 and $60 an hour, The average animation artist salary is $127,398 in Nevada, $110,247 in Rhode Island, and $109,603 in Connecticut. These are the three highest-paying states for animation artists in the US. Microsoft has the highest average salary for animation artists. Media is the highest-paying industry for animation artists in the US.
Can non Japanese make anime?
Anime came from Japan, but the etymology of the term and the use of “anime” as a global marketing tool has obscured what counts within the medium. 
Anime may be Japanese in origin, but now more than ever, it’s a medium that’s enjoyed by viewers across the world. This has seen more anime than ever reach multitudes of audiences through streaming services and other venues. These services, especially Netflix, are taking advantage of this by marketing some shows as “anime,” bringing into question just what types of shows are worthy of the designation.
View complete answer
Does animation require science?
Understanding Physics – When an animator creates a character their job is to make it as life-like as possible. Ironically enough, this does not mean that the character should look like an actual human. A life-like character is the one that exhibits human-like emotions, movements, and behavior patterns.
Although “Toy Story 4” was based on cartoon figures, their movements and behavior patterns were a perfect depiction of the real people. To achieve this, an animator must have an outstanding knowledge of physics, especially when it comes to Newton’s laws, gravity, concepts of energy, and motion. Possessing knowledge of those concepts will help animators create projects where the characters look like they are a part of the real world.
For example, when an animated figure jumps in the air and lands on the ground, the viewers will immediately correlate that with gravity. Since cartoon figures made on a computer have very little in common with gravity, however, such a simple idea can be quite tricky.
First, the animator must know the approximate acceleration of the gravitational force. They subsequently need to consider the character’s weight. Finally, they need to make the jump and landing believable by editing details such as the character’s hair going up and down, hands moving with the body, and much more.
Thus, while mathematical calculations are technically not needed, physics are mandatory for anyone who wants to make a realistic animation.
View complete answer
