How Long Do I Need To Study For The Lsat?
Determining how many hours you need for LSAT prep – First of all, let’s talk bare minimum: you’ll need to allocate 120 hours worth of preparation to get well acquainted with the test in general. The keyword here is “minimum.” If you are looking for a massive score increase or want to spend more time diving into test skills according to your needs, this should not be your LSAT prep goal in terms of how many hours you set aside.
- We recommend that most students look to spend 150–300 hours on LSAT prep; that’s a healthy range over a two or three-month period at around 20–25 hours per week, which is a standard amount for most students.
- Eep in mind that those hours include any classes or private LSAT tutoring sessions you might be using.
If you are DIY LSAT prep, you should nudge toward the higher end of that time recommendation because you will have to do more of the analysis and organization of the material yourself.
View complete answer
- 1 Can I get into Harvard Law with a 165 LSAT?
- 2 How hard is it to pass the LSAT?
- 3 What is the hardest month to take the LSAT?
How long does it take to learn the LSAT?
Tip #2: Aim for 250 to 300 hours of LSAT preparation – For most students, a three-month period of preparation (of approximately 20 hours per week) is a great goal. This is, of course, an estimate; most students are not all students. To find out how much LSAT prep time you’re likely to need, we recommend taking a to get a baseline score.
- Students scoring close to their goal scores may need less than that three-month period.
- Those scoring more than ten points from their goals are likely to need additional prep time.
- Practical considerations, such as work and personal commitments, will come into play here, as will your own unique needs and learning style.
Nonetheless, 250 to 300 hours of LSAT preparation over a period of a few months is a good benchmark. Most students who dedicate significantly less time won’t maximize their LSAT scores. While you may ultimately need more than three months to prepare if you don’t get the score increases you need within that time frame, it’s best not to start too long before your planned test date.
View complete answer
Can you get a 170 on the LSAT in 3 months?
If you treat it as a job and devote all of your time and attention to studying, then 2–3 months should be sufficient. If you’re working a full time job and fitting in studying around the edges, then 4–6 months is a more reasonable time frame. This is assuming that your starting score is around the average score of 152.
View complete answer
Can I get into Harvard Law with a 165 LSAT?
Good LSAT Scores for Top Law Schools – Each law school has a unique set of policies regarding LSAT scores. Some accept applicants with the best scores only, and some are a bit more lenient. As long as you have a score that surpasses a school’s minimum requirements, you have a chance of being accepted.
So, what do you need to score to get into the law school of your choice? To determine what counts as a good LSAT score for the school of your choice, you need to identify what the school wants. For example, if you are applying to a school like the University of Pittsburgh or Vermont Law School, an LSAT score of 160 is plenty.
On the other hand, if you apply to a top ten law school like Columbia University, Harvard, or the University of Chicago, 160 won’t get you anywhere. A good LSAT score isn’t enough for those schools. What you need is an almost perfect LSAT score. Harvard is exceptionally competitive.
To be in the 75th percentile, you need to score at least 175. Scoring 170 puts you in the 25th percentile of Harvard applicants. Even if your score is very high, there is still a high chance they won’t admit you. This brings us to an important point: a high score does not guarantee you’ll get into the school you want.
It helps, yes, but it’s only one factor in the review process. Here is a breakdown of what counts as a good enough score for law schools based on the school’s rank:
Top-five law schools: 170 to 180. Schools like Harvard and Yale, which are the top two, rarely accept applicants with less than 172 on the LSAT. Law schools ranked between 5 and 10: 165 to 170 Law schools ranked between 10 and 50: 155 to 165 Law schools ranked between 50 and 100: 150 to 162 Other schools: 135 to 150
These are the minimum required LSAT scores. So, naturally, scoring higher than the minimum increases your chances of admission to the school.
View complete answer
What is the average LSAT for Yale?
12. University of California-Berkeley – Even though the University of California-Berkeley is at the bottom of this list, that doesn’t mean getting accepted is easy. In fact, only 20.2% of students get accepted, the same as Duke University. It’s still among the top 5% in terms of overall rankings.
View complete answer
What is 80% LSAT score?
What LSAT Percentile is Required for Top–Tier Schools? – In the section above, we’ve laid out the different levels of performance, ranging from a well above average percentile to a score that ranks in the bottom quarter of LSAT participants. While a percentile rank above 80% is likely to be viewed positively by top law school programs, a score in the 50th percentile or below might make acceptance far more difficult.
|Average LSAT Score
|Average LSAT Percentile
|New York University Law
However, most programs view an LSAT score of 160 — which falls around the 80th percentile — with high regard. In other words, every law school program is unique with its own requirements. Of course, some programs value the LSAT results more strongly than others, and some value the GPA and practical experience more than the LSAT.
View complete answer
Can you study for the LSAT in a month?
Model LSAT 1-Month Study Plan – To make the most out of your study plan, consider the following as you work through the model:
- One month is the minimum for LSAT prep. You can make great score improvements with one intense month of study, practice, and review, but most expert LSAT faculty will recommend a longer schedule if one is possible for you. Once you’ve taken a full-length practice test under timed conditions, compare your score to your goal score. Then, factor in the amount of time you’ll have to study. Are you looking for an LSAT score improvement of, say, 10 or even 15 points? Are you working or going to school during your prep? Do you have other family obligations? If one or more of those factors concerns you, please check out Kaplan’s model 2- and 3-month study plans. For more insight, chat or call a Kaplan LSAT expert about your study plans,
- Adapt the model to meet your needs. No model study schedule will be exactly right for you. Apply the principles illustrated here to your own calendar, and then keep the times you’ve allocated to LSAT study and practice free from other obligations and interruptions. Throughout the model plan, you’ll find notes to help you make the most of the plan. After the model, there is an important section with additional tips on how to personalize your LSAT study and practice.
- Keep in mind that while the chapters listed in the study plan below are specific to the Kaplan LSAT Prep Plus 2020-2021 book, you can likely find coinciding chapters in whatever LSAT book you have. If you don’t have the Kaplan book, take some time before you begin studying to customize your study plan by identifying readings for each assignment and writing them down.
How hard is it to pass the LSAT?
Is the LSAT Hard? – The Short Answer Is a Big Yes The LSAT is used to test the knowledge of the examinee and test their abilities to see if they can handle a legal career. So it’s natural that prospective law students typically all have a similar worry: how hard will the LSAT be? The Law School Admission Council ()—the organization that created and administers the LSAT—uses the test to make sure that students are capable of practicing law and serious about it.
- While some may casually take the LSAT, they are sure to fail.
- To do well on the LSAT requires months of studying.
- This process is not only time-consuming but can be very expensive as well.
- So yes, the LSAT is hard, and it is designed that way.
- It’s not so much a test that requires a student to remember random facts, but instead, it is a test that showcases a student’s thought process.
Because of this, it is very different from other tests that a student might have taken up to this point, such as the SAT or ACT. This article will go over why the LSAT is so challenging and what you can do about it. Then, we’ll review each section of the LSAT and even throw in some helpful study tips.
View complete answer
What is the hardest month to take the LSAT?
Easiest LSAT Curve One of the most common questions I get from you guys new to the LSAT is: “Which LSAT’s month is the easiest/hardest?”Anyone who knows anything will tell you, “They’re all the same. No month’s LSAT is particularly easy or difficult.”You then ask, “But what about the curve?” Answer: “” If you’re especially savvy, you won’t be satisfied with that.
- You’ll look at my and,
- Using that data, you’ll find that the December exam consistently has the easiest “curve,” and the June exam consistently has the hardest.
- In this blog post, I do two things:1.
- Include my analysis of the raw score conversion charts, which supports the claim that December exams consistently have the easiest “curve” and June exams consistently have the hardest “curve.”2.
include my lengthy email conversation with the blog reader who brought this to my attention. I should mention right off the bat that the differences we’re talking about are only a point or two out of 180. Additionally, I still think that the June exam is the best for admissions purposes (see and,) However, the differences covered in this blog post are consistent for the past 8 years (and in some cases, beyond that).
- Analyzing the Past 8 Years (aka how do you know I’m not making this up?)
First, I did a month-by-month comparison of the raw score conversion charts for the past 8 years of exams: PrepTest 37=June 2002 through PrepTest 59=Dec 2009 (present). I analyzed the June, September/October, and December exams on 5 data points.The following is the average number of questions you could answer incorrectly (by month) and still achieve scaled scores of 160, 165, 170, 172, and 180, respectively, over the past 8 years: In case you can’t see the image, here’s that data in text form:Jun: 24.125, 16.5, 10, 8, 1.5S/O: 24.875, 16.5, 10.25, 8.25, 1.75 Dec: 26.25, 18.125, 11.375, 9.25, 2 (I didn’t examine any data points between 173 and 179 because each exam lacked at least one of these scores.
In other words, there were too many cases where there was no raw score that converted to one of those scores out of 180.)In all cases for averaged raw score conversions over this period (for these data points), one could answer a greater number of questions incorrectly on the December exam than on either the June or the Sept/Oct exams, yet still achieve the same score out of 180.In 4 out of 5 cases, the Sep/Oct exam was slightly “easier” than June, as well.
In the other case, they were perfectly tied.To put it another way, in 4 out of 5 cases, the June exam required the most correct answers to achieve a particular scaled score. In the other case, it was perfectly tied with Sep/Oct. How Big Is This Trend? Does It Also Hold For The 8 Years Before That? To determine this, I also analyzed PrepTest 11=June 1994 through PrepTest 36=December 2001 by month: June, September/October, and December on 2 data points, just to see if the general trend held true in the 8 years prior to June 02:The following is the average number of questions you could answer incorrectly over that period (by month) and still achieve scaled scores of 160 and 170, respectively: In case you can’t see the image, here’s that data in text form:Jun: 27.875, 12S/O: 29.125, 12.875 Dec: 27.625, 14.125 These findings are somewhat surprising, given what I found for June 02-December 09 (above).
- However, my most surprising finding for this period: it was actually a bit easier to get a 160 in September/October than in either June or December, a trend that certainly hasn’t held true in the past 8 years.
- How Do February LSAT Conversions Compare To Those of Other Months?
- I didn’t compare the February exam data with current exam data because it currently takes more questions correct to get a particular scaled score (out of 180) across the board than it did in the past ().
After all this analysis of June, Sep/Oct, and Dec, I started wondering how February exams compare. Unfortunately, no February LSATs have been released since 2000, so our sample size is both older and smaller than it otherwise would have been.However, I did what I could.
I looked specifically at the conversion charts for nearly every exam from February 1994 – December 2000.7 February exams were released over this period. (I excluded the entire year of 1998 because that year’s February exam was not released.)The following is the average number of questions you could answer incorrectly over that period (by month) and still achieve scaled scores of 160 and 170, respectively: In case you can’t see the image, here’s that data in text form:Feb: 27.166, 12.333Jun: 27.833, 11.833S/O: 29.5, 12.833 Dec: 27.667, 14.166 At the 160 data point, the Feb exam was the most difficult (required the most questions correct to get a 160).
At the 170 data point, it was the second most difficult.Of course, as we know from looking at the entire 8-year period from 1994-2001 period (previous section), what was true of the 160 data point was not true of the present day.We have no way of knowing whether Feb exams have continued to be relatively difficult, of course, since they’re no longer released.
However, it’s still something to keep in mind. ***The following email exchange includes some off-the-cuff hypothesizing about the reasons that December exams consistently allow one to have a greater number of incorrect answers, yet still achieve the same scaled score. (The data above also raises questions about why June exams consistently require one to have a fewer number of incorrect answers to achieve the same scaled score.)Unfortunately, we have more questions than answers as to “why.”Is it because the December tests are consistently harder and June tests are consistently easier?Looking at the exams, it doesn’t seem that way.
Without a large sample size, it’s difficult to say. All we can say is that difficulty of particular exams and questions is, to a certain extent, subjective.Additionally, one would think LSAC aims to make each exam of equal difficulty to avoid too much variation in the raw score conversion charts.
- After all, LSAC wants to maintain the equivalency of scores from different exams.Is it because the December/June pools of LSAT-takers are “different” in some way? Maybe.Is it because LSAC abducted Elvis? Maybe.Any hypothesis about it is just that – a guess.
- As, statistics isn’t my thing – it’s much easier for me to take averages, as I did above, than to tell you the reason the numbers appear as they do – that’s a whole different ball game.
I’ve asked LSAC to shed some light on these questions. Here’s part of LSAC’s response:”The differences you describe are very small and represent the type of minor fluctuation we expect to observe.” I still think the differences are important enough to warrant this blog post.
My emails with the blog reader (Christopher) who brought this to my attention: Christopher: I read your posts about the LSAT “curve” (that’s not really a curve) and then looked at the raw score conversion charts – it seems to me from quick analysis that the December LSAT consistently seems to be “easier.” Easier is a relative term I suppose, but let’s say we look only at the upper end of the scores – ie.170-180.
It’s hard to get an exact comparison since there are so many blanks in the upper ranges from year to year but it seems that consistently in a given year with the December test, you can afford to get more questions incorrect to achieve the same scaled score,
- Me :
- Christopher :
- Photo by /
For the last 8 years, at least, the data supports what you suggested.It would certainly be worthwhile to take in December if one’s primary goal were to safely achieve high scores – less punishment for bubbling errors, or for any errors at all, of course.
I would expect someone scoring at that level wouldn’t have significant time issues, though.There are considerations that, generally speaking, might lead one to avoid December, though. An admissions-related consideration is that Dec is rather late in the cycle to apply to a T14 school, especially for T5 schools.
Of course, a 175-180 would more than eliminate any drawback of applying that late. However, if something goes wrong in December, you’re basically out of luck for that cycle (for many top schools).(You could always take in December and apply in the following fall, but most people don’t plan that far ahead, and most aren’t willing to wait that long.)At the same time, though, if you’re capable of getting 175-180 in Dec, you can probably also get it in Feb, June, or Sept/Oct.
- At the same time, better safe than sorry, though.All the points you mention are definitely true if you have other concerns than just scoring high – i.e.
- Admissions/timing concerns.
- My question was more just specifically if your intent was to try and get as high a score as possible (and timing was less of an issue).Thinking more about this – I wonder if it’s due to the fact that more people take the test in December but the ratio of high scorers to low scorers doesn’t scale equivalently at the same rate.i.e.
if the ratios were the same, and when the number of test takers doubled it was as if everyone grew a twin with the exact same scoring ability, then it would make no difference which month you took the test in.However, conversely (and what the data would seem to suggest, although you wouldn’t be able to prove it) – maybe when twice as many people take the test in December, there’s a disproportionately increased number of “average test-takers”, but less (as a percentage of the total) “high-scoring” test takers.
Therefore if you were a “high scorer” it would be in your benefit to take December because there are a smaller percentage of people who are at your ability or better.This latter thought is just a hypothesis – not sure how valid it is given that I did a quick glance at scores in the ranges around 130 and it still seems that “Dec” is easier.If you look at the, you’ll find that the September/October exam is the most popular, by far.I hypothesize that there are fewer strong test-takers in the December pool because it’s late in the cycle.
Perhaps a lot of the weaker test-takers who take, or planned to take, the September/October exam retake it in December. Generally, the stronger test-takers from Sept/Oct wouldn’t need to retake because they did fine.I’m inclined to agree with your hypothesis about December test-takers.
- I think it’s a combination of what you mentioned + the fact that (for college kids) Sept allows for summer prep whereas Dec doesn’t.
- Also, Dec runs into the problem of conflicting with exam study.Additionally, under our current tough economic conditions, I would guess a lot of people may not think about going to law/grad school until they realize that finding a job is harder than it seems.
For May graduates they may not realize this until the summer winds down and the end of the year approaches and suddenly they find themselves in a position where they want to take the LSAT, GMAT etc. “just to leave their options” open. Once again though, unfortunately there’s really no way to prove this, though.
View complete answer